Accès libre

Buckling Analysis of Innovative Corrugated Column by using Response Surface Methodology

À propos de cet article

Citez

[1] Migita Y., Aoki T., Fukumoto Y. (1992), Local and interaction buckling of polygonal section steel columns, Journal of Structural Engineering 118, pp. 2659-76.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Chen J, Jin W. L. (2010), Experimental investigation of thin-walled complex section concrete-filled steel stub columns, Thin-walled structures 48, pp. 718-24.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ventsel E, et al. (2002), Thin plates and shells: theory, analysis, and applications, Appl. Mech. Rev., 55, B72-3.10.1115/1.1483356Search in Google Scholar

[4] Aoki T., Ji B. (2000), Experimental study on buckling strength of tri-tube steel members, In Coupled Instabilities in Metal Structures: CIMS’2000; pp. 283-290.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Nassirnia M., et al. (2015), Innovative hollow corrugated columns: A fundamental study, Engineering structures 94, pp. 43-53.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Deng X., et al. (2018), Experimental and theoretical study on crashworthiness of star-shaped tubes under axial compression, Thin-Walled Structures 130, pp. 321-31.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Rahim M. R., et al. (2017), Comparative analysis of buckling load of circular and corrugated tubes by utilizing key performance indicators, International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering 22, pp. 789-97.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Azargohar R., Dalai A. K. (2005), Production of activated carbon from Luscar char: experimental and modeling studies, Microporous and mesoporous materials 85, pp. 219-25.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Montgomery DC (2014), Design and analysis of experiments. 8th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Gunaraj V., Murugan N. (1999), Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged arc welding of pipes, Journal of materials processing technology 88, pp. 266-75.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Napier-Munn T. J., The central composite rotatable design JKMRC, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia 2000; 10, pp. 1-9.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Sen R. (1997), Response surface optimization of the critical media components for the production of surfactin, Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology: International Research in Process, Environmental AND Clean Technology 68, pp. 263-70.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Box G. E., Hunter J. S. (1957), Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 28, pp. 195-241.Search in Google Scholar

[14] ANSYS®, Types of Buckling Analyses, in ANSYS® Release 17.1, Help System, Mechanical APDL, Structural Analysis Guide, Buckling Analysis: ANSYS, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

[15] ANSYS®, Nonlinear Buckling Analysis, in ANSYS® Release 17.1, Help System, Mechanical Applications, Mechanical User’s Guide, Analysis Types, Linear Dynamic Analysis Types: ANSYS, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Yi S., et al. (2010), Application of response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design in optimizing the preparation conditions of vinyltriethoxysilane modified silica lite /polydimethylsiloxane hybrid pervaporation membranes, Separation and Purification Technology 71, pp. 252-6Search in Google Scholar