Civil and Commercial Jurisprudence Observations on Intelligent Social Governance

[1] Norman, N., & Beatriz, G. M. (2021). Look before you leap: are your oil patch liability clauses enforceable?: (an analysis under civil law jurisdictions with emphasis on brazil). Journal of World Energy Law & Business. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Amaral-Garcia, S. (2019). Medical malpractice appeals in a civil law system: do administrative and civil courts award noneconomic damages differently?. Law & Society Review. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Guangjian, T. (2014). Service of process (documents) in international civil and commercial proceedings: a critical review of the chinese approach. Chinese Journal of International Law(3), 577-604. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Fan, H., & Li, T. (2016). Discussion on the Feasible Path of Intelligent Community Participatory Governance in New Media Context. International Conference on Social Science & Higher Education. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Paquet, G., & Wilson, C. Intelligent Governance: an alternative paradigm. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Sharma, A., & Shekhar, H. (2020). Intelligent learning based opinion mining model for gover. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Mannes, A. (2020). Governance, risk, and artificial intelligence. Ai Magazine, 41(1), 61-69.nmental decision making. Procedia Computer Science, 173, 216-224. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Goode, R. (2021). Creativity and transnational commercial law: from carchemish to cape town. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 70(Pta1). Search in Google Scholar

[9] Rühl, & Giesela. (2018). Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters after brexit: which way forward?. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 67(01), 99-128. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Liu, H. (2017). Research on the teaching reform of civil and commercial law course in colleges based on the fuzzy evaluation model. Revista de la Facultad de Ingenieria, 32(13), 448-453. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Lu, Q. Z. Q. (2020). Homestead management in china from the “separation of two rights” to the “separation of three rights”: visualization and analysis of hot topics and trends by mapping knowledge domains of academic papers in china national knowledge infrastructure (cnki). Land Use Policy, 97(1). Search in Google Scholar