A study on the evolutionary model of legal disputes based on fractal theory

[1] Hurter, E. (2020). The shift from formal civil dispute resolution towards mandatory mediation–a cause for concern?. Journal of South African Law/Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg, 2020(2), 292-307. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Hoseinnejad, S. H., Noorsharg, J., Hosseini, S. M., & Farahi, H. (2022). The Challenge Between Civil Liability of Court and Arbitrator in the Case of Referring the Dispute to Arbitrator Despite the invalidity of Arbitration Clause. Political Sociology of Iran, 5(10), 2205-2220. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Rostovska, K. V., Hryshyna, N. V., Kaidash, O. Y., & Syromiatnikova, M. S. (2021). Mediation as a means to resolve administrative disputes: an appraisal of the historical and legal aspects. DIXI, 23(1), 2. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Lyan, I., & Frenkel, M. (2022). Industrial espionage revisited: host country–foreign multinational corporation legal disputes and the postcolonial imagery:. Organization, 29(1), 30-50. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Covert, H., Sherman, M., & Lichtveld, M. (2019). The national association of community health workers disputes the methods and findings of covert et al. reponse. American journal of public health, (10), 109. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Paris, R. (2019). Alone in the world?: making sense of canada’s disputes with saudi arabia and china. International journal (Toronto, Ont.), 74(1), 151-161. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Silver, D., Rothbart, M. W., & Bae, J. Y. (2021). By the letter of law? the effects of administrative adjudication for resolving disputes in nyc’s restaurant grading initiative:. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(8), 619-635. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Mcclay, C. (2019). Mediation in medical treatment: a more effective way to manage disputes. Catholic University law review, (3). Search in Google Scholar

[9] А. Нестерова, & Н. Шелевер. (2019). Mediation as an alternative method of public legal disputes solving. Problems of Legality, (145). Search in Google Scholar

[10] Mandel, G. N. (2017). Legal evolution in response to technological change. Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Zhai, T., & Chang, Y. C. (2018). Standing of environmental public-interest litigants in China: Evolution, obstacles and solutions. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(3), 369-397. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Poppe, E. S. T., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2015). Do lawyers matter? The effect of legal representation in civil disputes. Pepp. L. Rev., 43, 881. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Venediktov, V., Boiko, V., Kravchenko, I., Tyshchenko, O., Akimova, L., & Akimov, O. (2021). European standards of mediation in civil disputes and their implementation in Ukraine: theory and practice. Ad Alta: Journal of interdisciplinary research, (11 (2)), 25-29. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Siboy, A., Al-Fatih, S., Efendi, V. D., & Hidayah, N. P. (2022). The Effectiveness of Administrative Efforts in Reducing State Administration Disputes. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 2(1). Search in Google Scholar

[15] Cashman, P., & Ginnivan, E. (2019). Digital justice: online resolution of minor civil disputes and the use of digital technology in complex litigation and class actions. Macquarie LJ, 19, 39. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Sourdin, T., Burke, T., & Li, B. (2019). Just, quick and cheap?: Civil dispute resolution and technology. Macquarie Law Journal, 19, 17-38. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Salter, S. (2017). Online dispute resolution and justice system integration: British Columbia’s Civil Resolution Tribunal. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 34(1), 112-129. Search in Google Scholar