Optimization of the quality management path of physical education teaching in colleges and universities integrating modern network technology

[1] Li, M., & Lv, H. (2021). A study on the construction of O2O teaching system of college English cross-cultural knowledge based on MOOC artificial intelligence. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 17, 1-6. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Li, L., Johnson, J., Aarhus, W., et al. (2022). Key factors in MOOC pedagogy based on NLP sentiment analysis of learner reviews: What makes a hit. Computers & Education, 176, 1-Jan. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Gleason, K. T., Kearns, R., Himmelfarb, C., et al. (2021). Massive open online course (MOOC) learning builds capacity and improves competence for patient safety among global learners: A prospective cohort study. Nurse Education Today, 104. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Cna, B., Lbb, C., Vade, F., et al. (2021). Spreading geriatric oncology culture through professional caregivers: Results of a French massive open online course (MOOC). Journal of Geriatric Oncology. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Zhang, Z. (2017). Analysis of the Talent Demand and Cultivation of Safety Engineering in the New Normal. Science Journal of Business and Management, 5(6), 206. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Peng, X., & Xu, Q. (2020). Investigating learners’ behaviors and discourse content in MOOC course reviews. Computers & Education, 143(Jan.), 103673.1-103673.14. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Douglas, K. A., Merzdorf, H. E., Hicks, N. M., et al. (2020). Challenges to assessing motivation in MOOC learners: An application of an argument-based approach. Computers & Education, 150(2), 103829. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Nisha, F. (2019). Current Trends in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). In NATIONAL SEMINAR ON BRIDGING EDUCATIONAL DIVIDES THROUGH MOOCs & OERs. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Al-Mekhlafi, A., Othman, I., Kineber, A. F., et al. (2022). Modeling the Impact of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) Implementation Factors on Continuance Intention of Students: PLS-SEM Approach. Sustainability, 14. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Su, P. Y., Guo, J. H., & Shao, Q. G. (2021). Construction of the Quality Evaluation Index System of MOOC Platforms Based on the User Perspective. Sustainability, 13. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Centra, J. A. (1980). Determining faculty effectiveness. Jossey-Bass. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Everard, K. B., Morris, G., Wilson, I. (2004). Effective School Management (4th ed.). Paul Chapman Publishing, 31. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Marsh, H. W. (1980). Students’ Evaluations of College/University Teaching: A Description of Research and an Instrument. Evaluation Method. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Feldman, K. A. (1997). Consistency and variability among college students in rating their teachers and courses. Research in Higher Education, 6, 233-274. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Geronimo, V. A., & Aragon, C. (2014). Resource sharing in university libraries: A tool for information interchange. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 29(4), 425-432. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Cho, J. (2007). An evaluation plan for Korean university libraries to revitalize academic resource-sharing. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(4), 515-518. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Zhang, D., Allon, G., & Van Mieghem, J. A. (2017). Does social interaction improve learning outcomes? Evidence from field experiments on massive open online courses. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19(3), 347-367. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Joo, Y. J., So, H., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122(7), 260-272. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). From massive access to cooperation: Lessons learned and proven results of a hybrid xMOOC/cMOOC pedagogical approach to MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (ETHE), 13, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0024-z. Search in Google Scholar

[21] García-Peñalvo, F. J., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., & Sein-Echaluce, M. L. (2018). An adaptive hybrid MOOC model: Disrupting the MOOC concept in higher education. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1018-1030. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Guetl, C., Hernández, R., Chang, V., et al. (2014). Attrition in MOOC: Lessons learned from drop-out students. In Learning Technology for Education in Cloud. MOOC and Big Data (pp. 37-48). Springer International Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Stiller, K. D., & Bachmaier, R. (2017). Dropout in an online training for trainee teachers. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 20(1), 80-95. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Wu, Y., Ma, K., Cai, Z., et al. (2021). Seastar: Vertex-centric programming for graph neural networks. In EuroSys ‘21: Sixteenth European Conference on Computer Systems. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Stanimirović, P. S., Katsikis, V. N., & Shuai, L. (2018). Link to Hybrid GNN-ZNN models for solving linear matrix equations. Neurocomputing, S0925231218308932-. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Zhang, Y., Zhan, L., Yi, C., et al. (2008). Zhang Neural Network Versus Gradient Neural Network for Online Time-Varying Quadratic Function Minimization. In Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications. With Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computing, ICIC 2008, Shanghai, China, September 15-18, 2008, Proceedings. Springer-Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Zhang, J., Tang, Z., Xie, Y., et al. (2020). Timed key-value memory network for flotation reagent control. Control Engineering Practice, 98, 104360. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Zhang, J., Shi, X., King, I., et al. (2016). Dynamic Key-Value Memory Network for Knowledge Tracing. In The Web Conference. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Hua, L., Yi, G., Ji, J., et al. (2013). A Framework Design for MOOC-Oriented Learning Management System. Modern Distance Education Research. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Hidasi, B., & Karatzoglou, A. (2017). Recurrent Neural Networks with Top-k Gains for Session-based Recommendations. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Mathai, A., Bandyopadhyay, S., Desai, U., et al. (2021). Monolith to Microservices: Representing Application Software through Heterogeneous GNN. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Mathai, A., Bandyopadhyay, S., Desai, U., et al. (2021). Monolith to Microservices: Representing Application Software through Heterogeneous GNN. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Zocca, A., Borst, S. C., & Leeuwaarden, J. V. (2014). Slow transitions, slow mixing and starvation in dense random-access networks. Computer Science. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Feng, L. I., & Guo, G. Q. (2009). Research and Implementation of Key Technologies of Modern Distance Education Platform Based on J2EE and VRML. Modern Computer. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Yang, Y., & Yue, Y. (2020). Empirical Study on Intelligent Formative Evaluation of Text Guiding Performance Assisted by Java System and Data Mining. In 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT). Search in Google Scholar

[36] Guerrero–Sánchez, Y., Umar, M., Sabir, Z., et al. (2021). Solving a class of biological HIV infection model of latently infected cells using heuristic approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-S, 14(10), 3611. Search in Google Scholar