Accès libre

Study on the social impact Assessment of Primary Land Development: Empirical Analysis of Public Opinion Survey on New Town Development in Pinggu District of Beijing

Lei Gao
Lei Gao
   | 03 févr. 2021
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Publié en ligne: 03 févr. 2021
Pages: 31 - 42
Reçu: 13 sept. 2020
Accepté: 02 déc. 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2021.1.00003
Mots clés
© 2021 Lei Gao, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fig. 1

Lithograph of factor analysis.
Lithograph of factor analysis.

Statistical analysis on variable descriptions of stakeholders (n = 217)

Variables Variable descriptions Mean value Standard deviation Minimum Maximum
Dependent variable Overall attitude 1=objection, 2=indifference, 3=conditional support, 4=support, 5= and others 3.44 0.809 1 5
Control variables and independent variables Sex 0= male, 1=female 0.65 0.478 0 1
Age 1=30 off, 2= 30~45, 3=45~60, 4=above 60 3.10 0.897 1 4
Occupation 1= workers, 2=farmers, 3= commercial servicemen 4=civil servants, 5= the self-employed, 6=professionals, 7= enterprise and public institution staff, 8=students, 9=the retired, 10=others 5.32 3.538 1 10
Education 1= high school or less, 2=college, 3=bachelor, 4=master and above 1.20 0.557 1 4
Year of building Numerical variables 1985.38 13.865 1903 2009
Population Numerical variables 4.13 2.467 0 11
Living conditions 1= unsatisfied, 2= general, 3= satisfied 2.94 0.341 1 3
Living environment 1= unsatisfied, 2=general, 3=satisfied 2.95 0.285 1 3
Resettlement and compensative ways 1=monetary, 2= house property right exchange, 3=monetary combined with house property right 2.55 0.584 1 4
Resettlement satisfaction 1=unsatisfied, 2= unknown, 3=almost satisfied, 4=obedient to arrangement, 5= satisfied, 6=very satisfied 2.75 1.428 1 6
Compensation satisfaction 1=unsatisfied, 2= almost satisfied, 3=satisfied, 4= very satisfied 2.77 1.382 1 6

Explicatory analysis of total variance

Elements Initial eigenvalue Extract square and load Rotate square and load
Total Of variance Cumulative Total Of variance Cumulative Total Of variance Cumulative
1 2.253 18.778 18.778 2.253 18.778 18.778 2.140 17.832 17.832
2 1.936 16.130 34.907 1.936 16.130 34.907 1.926 16.053 33.885
3 1.392 11.601 46.509 1.392 11.601 46.509 1.397 11.638 45.523
4 1.249 10.411 56.919 1.249 10.411 56.919 1.250 10.416 55.939
5 1.121 9.340 66.259 1.121 9.340 66.259 1.195 9.960 65.898
6 1.023 8.527 74.785 1.023 8.527 74.785 1.066 8.887 74.785
7 0.898 7.483 82.268
8 0.760 6.331 88.599
9 0.702 5.850 94.449
10 0.503 4.192 98.641
11 0.123 1.023 99.664
12 0.040 0.336 100.000

Coefficientsa of relevant social influence factors

Model Non-standardised coefficients Standardised coefficients t Sig.
B Standard error Testing edition
1 Constant 6.237 8.046 0.775 0.439
Sex 0.311 0.116 0.184 2.679 0.008
Age −0.002 0.066 −0.002 −0.030 0.976
Occupation −0.013 0.016 −0.056 −0.822 0.412
Education level 0.109 0.109 0.075 1.000 0.318
Year of house construction −0.002 0.004 −0.026 −0.376 0.708
Residential population −0.012 0.022 −0.038 −0.555 0.580

Sampling moderation values and Bartlett's test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin metric of sampling sufficiency 0.726
Bartlett's test of sphericity Approximate to chi-square 964.658
df 66
Sig. 0.000

Anovaa

Model Sum of squares df Mean square F Sig.
1 Regression 7.171 6 1.195 1.868 0.008b
Residual 134.359 210 0.640
Total 141.530 216

Componential matrixa of related variables

Components
1 2 3 4 5 6
Gender 0.227 0.020 −0.145 −0.459 0.579 0.154
Age −0.139 0.150 −0.764 −0.064 0.034 −0.338
Occupation −0.027 −0.164 0.130 −0.200 −0.687 −0.019
Education level 0.181 0.069 0.776 −0.331 0.149 −0.052
Year of house built −0.199 −0.111 −0.139 0.129 −0.085 0.908
Number of inhabitants −0.172 ++++ 0.144 0.040 0.689 0.277 0.023
Satisfaction of existing living conditions −0.100 0.948 0.062 −0.068 −0.068 0.065
Satisfaction of current living environment −0.133 0.947 0.057 −0.027 −0.038 0.071
Ways of compensation and resettlement −0.034 −0.084 0.344 0.555 0.166 −0.182
Whether villagers are satisfied with methods and standards of compensation and resettlement 0.922 0.140 −0.089 0.191 −0.193 0.016
Whether the subsidy standard is satisfactory 0.920 0.144 −0.088 0.192 −0.177 0.044
Overall attitude 0.596 −0.068 −0.071 −0.085 0.324 0.110

Statistical table of stakeholders’ concerns

Issues concerned House removal Number of households Compensation ways Number of households Problems after relocation (optional) Number of households
Compensative standards and its reasonableness 100 Property right exchange plus monetary compensation 207 Pension problems 137
Implementation of compensation funds 48 Pure monetary compensation 10 Changes in living environment 86
Follow-up security issues of demolition 32 Other subsidies Number of households Employment issues 55
Openness and legality of removing information 37 Employment arrangement 88 Schooling problem of kids 43
Requests for Resettlement Methods Number of households Information of get-rich 47 Source of income 2
Resettlement nearby 140 Vocational skills training 43 No concerns 3
Relocation 49 Microloan discount 9 Rights protection ways that make waves (optional) Number of households
Obedient to arrangements 28 Without requests on this item 30 Report to government 127
Opinions on current resettlement ways Number of households Opinions on present compensative standard Number of households Self-negotiation 63
Very satisfied 9 Very satisfied 9 Legal solution 56
Satisfied 37 Satisfied 37 Petition way 16
Almost satisfied 47 Almost satisfied 52 Keep silent 24
Unsatisfied 35 Unsatisfied 28 By means of media or network 12
Unknown 89 Unknown 91 Protest by Uniting neighbouring residents 6
eISSN:
2444-8656
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
Volume Open
Sujets de la revue:
Life Sciences, other, Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, General Mathematics, Physics
RSS Feed de la revue