Accès libre

Research on the Construction of Industrial College and Talent Cultivation Mode under the Perspective of Industry-Education Integration--Taking “Seven-Color Craftsmen” Auto Repair Industrial College as an Example

,  et   
24 sept. 2025
À propos de cet article

Citez
Télécharger la couverture

Figure 1.

The weight of the evaluation index of the industry college construction
The weight of the evaluation index of the industry college construction

Figure 2.

The comprehensive evaluation of the construction of the industry college
The comprehensive evaluation of the construction of the industry college

Figure 3

The talent culture model of the industry college
The talent culture model of the industry college

The specific data of the Pearson correlation analysis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1.Education concept 1
2.Curriculum 0.759*** 1
3.Practice teaching quality 0.764*** 0.817*** 1
4.Enterprise participation 0.609** 0.685 0.759*** 1
5.Safeguard mechanism 0.748* 0.710* 0.712** 0.775* 1
6.Cooperative effect 0.774** 0 797*** 0.838*** 0.666*** 0.785** 1
7.Overall satisfaction 0.686*** 0.816*** 0.812*** 0.695*** 0.781*** 0.692*** 1

The result of multi-factor analysis

Variables Unnormalized coefficient S.E. Normalized coefficient t Sig. VIF
(Constants) -0.214 0.672 -2.795 0.685 3.619
Education concept 0.178 0.021 0.155 1.738 0.008 2.678
Curriculum 0.228 0.052 0.185 3.709 0.004 4.728
Practice teaching quality 0.344 0.094 0.363 2.732 0.007 6.844
Enterprise participation 0.352 0.075 0.374 4.776 0.005 5.672
Safeguard mechanism 0.202 0.086 0.283 3.771 0.003 4.812
Cooperative effect 0.365 0.081 0.383 2.741 0.004 3.625
F 374.583
P <0.01
R2 0.758
Factor: the satisfaction of talent cultivating development

The evaluation index system of the construction of the industry college

Primary index Secondary index
Management system X1 Construction development X11
Governance structure X12
Cooperative enterprise X13
Professional cluster X14
Talent cultivation X2 Professional construction X15
Teacher team X16
Culture pattern X17
Culture quality X18
Scientific innovation X3 R&D funding X19
R&D project X20
R&D results X21
Resultant transformation X22
Production service X4 Job employment X23
Cultural communication X24
Management consultation X25
Training service X26

Sample T test results of the variable

Variables Mean P The difference is 95% confidence interval
Upper limit Lower limit
Education concept 1.981 0.005 -1.423 -1.236
Curriculum 1.985 0.002 -1.582 -1.103
Practice teaching quality 2.012 0.006 -1.659 -1.019
Enterprise participation 1.691 0.004 -1.524 -1.043
Safeguard mechanism 2.063 0.008 -1.405 -1.101
Cooperative effect 1.862 0.001 -1.468 -1.078
Overall satisfaction 1.497 0.003 -1.514 -1.125
Test value=3