Analysis of the Application and Practical Effect of AI Technology in Civic Education Management in Colleges and Universities
19 mars 2025
À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 19 mars 2025
Reçu: 08 nov. 2024
Accepté: 08 févr. 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0520
Mots clés
© 2025 Xuekun Zhou, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.
![Silhouette coefficient of each cluster when K is in [2, 10]](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/67b4bb00082aa65dea3f5570/j_amns-2025-0520_fig_002.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20250917%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20250917T085707Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=6d769a71d053ca5e6b7873f3f9275e057c32ea00ea6f0e56608527953e6e8bbc&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Application effect analysis
Comparison of test scores in the experimental group | |||
---|---|---|---|
Test item | Average score | Standard deviation | Significance level |
Pretest | 70.13 | 13.01 | P<0.01 |
Posttest | 92.25 | 3.25 | |
Comparison between control group and experimental results of experimental results | |||
Class | Average score | Standard deviation | Significance level |
Cross-reference class | 35 | 87.36 | 6.42 |
Laboratory class | 35 | 92.25 | 3.25 |
P | 0.004 |
Dataset description
Categories | Describe | Symbol |
---|---|---|
Basic data | Gender | X1 |
Peoples | X2 | |
Political identity | X3 | |
Candidate category | X4 | |
Shooting mark | X5 | |
Additional information | X6 | |
Students with difficulty in family economics | X7 | |
Honour | Whether to get school honors | X8 |
Whether to receive the above provincial honors | X9 | |
The total amount of money awarded | X10 | |
GPA | First semester | X11 |
Second semester | X12 | |
Third semester | X13 | |
Fourth term | X14 | |
Semester five | X15 | |
Sixth term | X16 | |
Seventh semester | X17 | |
Semester 8 | X18 | |
Total GPA | X19 |
Student survey distribution
Content | Select | N | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Man | 160 | 56.14% |
Female | 125 | 43.86% | |
Age | Freshman year | 60 | 21.05% |
Sophomore | 68 | 23.86% | |
Junior | 87 | 30.53% | |
Senior year | 70 | 24.56% |
The reasons for the problem of the management of data in college students
Quantity of people | Quantity of people | ||
---|---|---|---|
Schoolmate | 178 | Personalized coaching | 281 |
Counsellor | 40 | Targeted guidance | 25 |
A functional department teacher | 29 | Forecast student requirements | 38 |
Campus network | 34 | Improve efficiency | 78 |
Teacher | 14 | Comprehensive assessment | 112 |
Parent | 220 | Establish student profile | 232 |