Synergistic Parenting Strategies and Practical Effects of Group Decision Making Theory in Civic Management Education in Colleges and Universities

[1] Cheng, D., Cheng, F., Zhou, Z., & Wu, Y. (2020). Reaching a minimum adjustment consensus in social network group decision-making. Information Fusion, 59, 30-43. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Razavi Hajiagha, S. H., & Hashemi, S. S. (2015). The interval‐ valued intuitionistic fuzzy multimoora method for group decision making in engineering. Mathematical problems in engineering, 2015(1), 560690. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Wu, Z., & Tu, J. (2021). Managing transitivity and consistency of preferences in AHP group decision making based on minimum modifications. Information Fusion, 67, 125-135. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Igoulalene, I., Benyoucef, L., & Tiwari, M. K. (2015). Novel fuzzy hybrid multi-criteria group decision making approaches for the strategic supplier selection problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(7), 3342-3356. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 369, 128-143. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Wu, J., Chang, J., Cao, Q., & Liang, C. (2019). A trust propagation and collaborative filtering based method for incomplete information in social network group decision making with type-2 linguistic trust. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, 853-864. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Amanchukwu, R. N., Stanley, G. J., & Ololube, N. P. (2015). A review of leadership theories, principles and styles and their relevance to educational management. Management, 5(1), 6-14. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M. A., & Elçi, A. (2019). Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 104-114. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Fu, C., Chang, W., & Yang, S. (2020). Multiple criteria group decision making based on group satisfaction. Information Sciences, 518, 309-329. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Yue, C. (2017). Entropy-based weights on decision makers in group decision-making setting with hybrid preference representations. Applied Soft Computing, 60, 737-749. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Rahman, K., Ali, A., Shakeel, M., Khan, M. A., & Ullah, M. (2017). Pythagorean fuzzy weighted averaging aggregation operator and its application to decision making theory. The Nucleus, 54(3), 190-196. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Wang, S., Wu, J., Chiclana, F., Sun, Q., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2022). Two-stage feedback mechanism with different power structures for consensus in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(10), 4177-4189. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Alfandari Ravit,Taylor Brian J.,Enosh Guy,Killick Campbell,McCafferty Paul,Mullineux Judith... & Whittaker Andrew.(2023).Group decision-making theories for child and family social work.European Journal of Social Work(2),204-217. Search in Google Scholar

[14] He Xin & Zhou Xiaoguang.(2022).Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Portfolio Optimization Based on Variable Subscript Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets.International Journal of Fuzzy Systems(2), 896-915. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Meng Fanyong,Li Zijun & Wang Zongrun.(2023).Cooperative game theory based consistency and consensus reaching process for group decision making with fuzzy preference relations.Journal of the Operational Research Society(10),2261-2276. Search in Google Scholar