[
1. Sreepadmanabh M, Sahu AK, Chande, A. COVID-19: Advances in diagnostic tools, treatment strategies, and vaccine development. Journal of Biosciences. 2020;45(1):148. doi:10.1007/s12038-020-00114-610.1007/s12038-020-00114-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Beltran PC, Marquez CL, Munoz G, Valiente-Echeverrıa F, et al. SARS-CoV-2 detection from nasopharyngeal swab samples without RNA extraction. bioRxiv. 2020; 013508. (Pre-print article) https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.28.01350.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Chan JFW, Yip CCY, To KKW, et al. Improved molecular diagnosis of COVID-19 by the novel, highly sensitive and specific COVID-19-RdRp/Hel real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay validated in vitro and with clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020; 58(5): e00310-20.10.1128/JCM.00310-20718025032132196
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Udugama B, Kadhiresan P, Kozlowski HN, et al. Diagnosing COVID-19: the disease and tools for detection. Nano ACS. 2020; 14:3822-35.10.1021/acsnano.0c02624714480932223179
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Naqvi AAT, Fatima K, Mohammad T, et al. Insights into SARSCoV-2 genome, structure, evolution, pathogenesis and therapies: Structural genomics approach. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2020;1866(10):165878.10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165878729346332544429
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Padhye NS. Reconstructed diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the RT-PCR test for COVID-19. medRxiv. 2021;2020.04.24:20078949.10.1101/2020.04.24.20078949
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Sethuraman N, Jeremiah SS, Ryo A. Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2. JAMA. 2020; 323(22): 2249.10.1001/jama.2020.825932374370
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Garg A, Ghoshal U, Patel SS, et all. Evaluation of seven commercial RTPCR kits for COVID-19 testing in pooled clinical specimens. J Med Virol. 2021; 93(4):2281-2286.10.1002/jmv.26691775343533230819
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Aranha C, Patel V, Bhor V, Gogoi D. Cycle threshold values in RT-PCR to determine dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 viral load: An approach to reduce the isolation period for COVID-19 patients. J Med Virol. 2021;93(12):6794-6797.10.1002/jmv.27206842694134264527
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Lion T. Current recommendations for positive controls in RT-PCR assays. Leukemia. 2001; 15(7):1033–7.10.1038/sj.leu.240213311455970
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. PCR/qPCR Plastics Considerations–4 Main Attributes. ThermoFisher Scientific. [Cited 2022 September 10] Available from: https://bit.ly/3Rzn1IN
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Auld DS, Coassin PA, Coussens NP, et al. Microplate Selection and Recommended Practices in High-throughput Screening and Quantitative Biology. in Markossian S, Grossman A, Brimacombe K, et al eds.: Assay Guidance Manual [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): Eli Lilly & Company and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. 2020. PMID: 32520474.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Plastic Makes the Difference: Ideal Real-time PCR Signals with Optimized Plastic Products [Internet]. Analytik Jena. 2020 [cited 2022 May 21]. Available from: https://www.analytik-jena.com/knowledge/blog/posts/plastic-makes-the-difference-ideal-real-time-pcr-signals-with-optimized-plastic-products
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Nayab S, Harries P, Baker S, Kavanagh I. The Effect of White Pigmentation in 96-well Plates During QPCR [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 21]. Available from: https://www.gene-quantification.de/qpcr2009/P025-qPCR-2009.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Reiter M, Pfaffl MW. Effects of Plate Position, Plate Type and Sealing Systems on Real-Time PCR Results. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2008; 22(3):824–828.10.1080/13102818.2008.10817561
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Rutledge RG, Sigmoidal curve-fitting redefines quantitative real-time PCR with the prospective of developing automated high-throughput applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(22):e178.10.1093/nar/gnh17754547515601990
]Search in Google Scholar
