<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>Ischemic heart disease (IHD) affects > 110 million individuals worldwide and represents an important contributor to the rise in the prevalence of heart failure and the associated mortality and morbidity. Despite modern therapies, up to one-third of patients with acute myocardial infarction would develop heart failure. IHD is a pathologic condition of the myocardium resulting from the imbalance in a given moment between its oxygen demands and the actual perfusion. Acute and chronic forms of the disease may potentially lead to extensive and permanent damage of the cardiac muscle. From a clinical point of view, determination of the still viable extent of myocardium is crucial for the therapeutic protocol – since ischemia is the underlying cause, then revascularization should provide for a better prognosis. Different methods for evaluation of myocardial viability have been described – each one presenting some advantages over the others, being, in the same time, inferior in some respects. The review offers a relatively comprehensive overview of methods available for determining myocardial viability.</p>
</abstract>

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) affects > 110 million individuals worldwide and represents an important contributor to the rise in the prevalence of heart failure and the associated mortality and morbidity. Despite modern therapies, up to one-third of patients with acute myocardial infarction would develop heart failure. IHD is a pathologic condition of the myocardium resulting from the imbalance in a given moment between its oxygen demands and the actual perfusion. Acute and chronic forms of the disease may potentially lead to extensive and permanent damage of the cardiac muscle. From a clinical point of view, determination of the still viable extent of myocardium is crucial for the therapeutic protocol – since ischemia is the underlying cause, then revascularization should provide for a better prognosis. Different methods for evaluation of myocardial viability have been described – each one presenting some advantages over the others, being, in the same time, inferior in some respects. The review offers a relatively comprehensive overview of methods available for determining myocardial viability.

Myocardial Viability – An Important Decision Making Factor in the Treatment Protocol for Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease

Pathophysiology Department, Faculty of Medicine

Acta Medica Bulgarica

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) affects > 110 million individuals worldwide and represents an important contributor to the rise in the prevalence of heart failure...

Myocardial Viability – An Important Decision Making Factor in the Treatment Protocol for Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease

Publié en ligne: 11 juil. 2022

Pages: 59 - 64

Reçu: 10 avr. 2022

Accepté: 17 mai 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2022-0022

Mots clés
myocardial viability, factor, treatment, IHD

© 2022 V. Grigorov et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Myocardial Viability – An Important Decision Making Factor in the Treatment Protocol for Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease

Publié en ligne: 11 juil. 2022

Pages: 59 - 64

Reçu: 10 avr. 2022

Accepté: 17 mai 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2022-0022

Mots clésmyocardial viability, factor, treatment, IHD

© 2022 V. Grigorov et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mots clés
myocardial viability, factor, treatment, IHD