[
1. Balletto E, Mikulska M. Bacterial infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2015,7(1):e2015045.10.4084/mjhid.2015.045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2011,52:e56.10.1093/cid/cir07321258094
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Mikulska M, Viscoli C, Orasch C, et al. Fourth European Conference on Infections in Leukemia Group ajvoEEIELN, Esgich/Escmid. Aetiology and resistance in bacteraemias among adult and paediatric haematology and cancer patients. J Infec 2014,68(4):321-331.10.1016/j.jinf.2013.12.00624370562
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Petrelli D, Zampaloni C, D’Ercole S et al. Analysis of different genetic traits and their association with biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from central venous catheter infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006,25:773-781.10.1007/s10096-006-0226-817089093
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Fey PD, Olson ME. Current concepts in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Future Microbiol 2011,5:917-933.10.2217/fmb.10.56290304620521936
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Klingenberg C, Aarag E, Ronnestad A et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal sepsis in neonates. Association between antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation and the host inflammatory response. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005,24;817-822.10.1097/01.inf.0000176735.20008.cd16148849
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Pourmand MR, Abdossamadi Z, Salari MH, Hosseini M. Slime layer formation and the prevalence of mecA and aap genes in Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011,5(1):34-4.10.3855/jidc.98421330738
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Fitzpatrick F, Humphreys H, O’gara JP. The genetics of staphylococcal biofilm formation – will a greater understanding of pathogenesis lead to better management of device-related infection? Clin Microbiol Infect 2005,11:967-973.10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01274.x16307550
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Freeman DJ, Falkiner FR, Keane CT. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. J Clin Pathol 1989,42:872-874.10.1136/jcp.42.8.87211420682475530
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Bisno AL, Beachey EH. Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infect Immun 1982,37:318-326.10.1128/iai.37.1.318-326.19823475296179880
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Kozitskaya S, Olson ME, Fey PD et al. Clonal analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates carrying or lacking bio-film-mediating genes by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol 2005,43:4751-4757.10.1128/JCM.43.9.4751-4757.2005123406916145137
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Weisser M, Theilacker C, Tschudin Sutter S et al. Secular trends of bloodstream infections during neutropenia in 15 181 haematopoietic stem cell transplants: 13-year results from a European multicentre surveillance study (ONKO-KISS). Clin Microbiol Infect 2017,23:854-859.10.1016/j.cmi.2017.03.02028366613
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Hong J, Moon SM, Ahn HK et al. Comparison of Characteristics of Bacterial Bloodstream Infection between Adult Patients with Allogeneic and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2013,19:988-999.10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.03.01923571460
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 10.0, 2020 http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Arciola CR, Baldassarri L, Montanaro L. Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections. J Clin Microbiol 2001,39:2151-2156.10.1128/JCM.39.6.2151-2156.20018810411376050
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Stegger M, Andersen PS, Kearns A et al. Rapid detection, differentiation and typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring either mecA or the new mecA homologue mecALGA251. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012,18(4):395-400.10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03715.x22429460
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Hussein RM, Rasheed MN, Mahdi LF. Molecular detection of virulence factors (adhesion genes) in some Staphylococcus epidermidis locally isolated from different clinical sources. J Adv Lab Res Biol 2018,9(4):106-110.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Prasad S, Nayak N, Satpathy G et al. Molecular & phenotypic characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis in implant related infections. Indian J Med Res 2012,136(3):483-490.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Pinheiro L, Brito CI, Pereira VC et al. Reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and biofilm formation in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from blood cultures. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2014,109:871-878.10.1590/0074-0276140120429649125410990
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. El-Mahallawy HA, Loutfy SA, El-Wakil M et al. Clinical implications of icaA and icaD genes in coagulase negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in febrile neutropenic pediatric cancer patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009,52(7):824-828.10.1002/pbc.2196419214976
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Oliveira A, de Laurdes RS Cunha M. Comparison of methods for the detection of biofilm production in coagulase-negative staphylococci. BMC Res Notes 2010,3:260.10.1186/1756-0500-3-260297394120946672
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Gowrishankar S, Kamaladevi A, Balamurugan K, Pandian SK. In vitro and In Vivo Biofilm Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Patients Associated with Pharyngitis Infection. Biomed Res Int 2016:1289157.10.1155/2016/1289157505952927761465
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Liberto MC, Matera G, Quirino A et al. Phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of slime production by conventional and molecular microbiological techniques. Microbiol Res 2009,164(5):522-528.10.1016/j.micres.2007.04.00417928210
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Ruzicka F, Hola V, Votova M et al. Biofilm detection and the clinical significance of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated. Folia Microbiol 2004,49:596-600.10.1007/BF02931540
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Ziebuhr W, Krimmer V, Rachid S et al. A novel mechanism of phase variation of virulence in Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for control of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesion synthesis by alternating insertion and excision of the insertion sequence element IS256. Mol Microbiol 1999,32(2):345-356.10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01353.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Zmantar T, Chaieb K, Makni H et al. Detection by PCR of adhesins genes and slime production in clinical Staphylococcus aureus. J Basic Microbiol 2008,48:308-314.10.1002/jobm.200700289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Zhou S, Chao X, Fei M et al. Analysis of S. epidermidis icaA and icaD genes by polymerase chain reaction and slime production: a case control study. BMC Infect Dis 2013,13:242.10.1186/1471-2334-13-242
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. De Oliveira RA, Mondelli AL, Fortaleza CM, et al. Detection of the mecA gene and identification of Staphylococcus directly from blood culture bottles by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Braz J Infect Dis 2018,22(2):99-105.10.1016/j.bjid.2018.02.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Mathur T, Singhal S, Khan S et al. Detection of biofilm formation among the clinical isolates of staphylococci: an evaluation of three different screening methods. Indian J Med Micro-biol 2006;24(1):25-29.10.1016/S0255-0857(21)02466-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Shrestha LB, Bhattarai NR, Khanal B. Comparative evaluation of methods for the detection of biofilm formation in coagulase-negative staphylococci and correlation with antibiogram. Infect Drug Resist 2018,11:607-613.10.2147/IDR.S159764592607529731649
]Search in Google Scholar