À propos de cet article

Citez

1. The 3R Initiative, https://www.env.go.jp/recycle/3r/en/outline.html (accessed March 11, 2022). Search in Google Scholar

2. Peng S, Ping J, Li T, et al. Environmental benefits of remanufacturing mechanical products: a harmonized meta-analysis of comparative life cycle assessment studies. Journal of Environmental Management; 306. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2022.114479. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Geng Z, Sabbaghi A, Bidanda B. Reconstructing Original Design: Process Planning for Reverse Engineering. DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2022.2040761. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Shahrubudin N, Lee TC, Ramlan R. An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Applications. Procedia Manufacturing 2019;35:1286–1296.10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089 Search in Google Scholar

5. Harris CG, Jursik NJS, Rochefort WE, et al. Additive Manufacturing With Soft TPU – Adhesion Strength in Multimaterial Flexible Joints. Front Mech Eng 2019;5:37.10.3389/fmech.2019.00037 Search in Google Scholar

6. Xiao J, Gao Y. The manufacture of 3D printing of medical grade TPU. Progress in Additive Manufacturing 2017;3:117–123.10.1007/s40964-017-0023-1 Search in Google Scholar

7. Haryńska A, Gubanska I, Kucinska-Lipka J, et al. Fabrication and Characterization of Flexible Medical-Grade TPU Filament for Fused Deposition Modeling 3DP Technology. Polymers (Basel); 10. Epub ahead of print November 25, 2018. DOI: 10.3390/POLYM10121304.640197030961229 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Herzberger J, Sirrine JM, Williams CB, et al. Polymer Design for 3D Printing Elastomers: Recent Advances in Structure, Properties, and Printing. Progress in Polymer Science 2019;97:101144.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101144 Search in Google Scholar

9. Rodríguez-Parada L, de la Rosa S, Mayuet PF. Influence of 3D-Printed TPU Properties for the Design of Elastic Products. Polymers (Basel) 2021;13:2519.10.3390/polym13152519834770834372122 Search in Google Scholar

10. American Chemistry Council. Thermoplastic Polyurethanes Bridge the Gap between Rubber and Plastics, https://www.americanchemistry.com/industry-groups/center-for-thepolyurethanes-industry-cpi/resources/library/thermoplasticpolyurethanes-bridge-the-gap-between-rubber-and-plastics (2002, accessed January 17, 2022). Search in Google Scholar

11. Xu T, Shen W, Lin X, et al. Mechanical properties of additively manufactured thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) material affected by various processing parameters. Polymers (Basel) 2020;12:1–16.10.3390/polym12123010776728033339361 Search in Google Scholar

12. Lee H, Eom RI, Lee Y. Evaluation of the mechanical properties of porous thermoplastic polyurethane obtained by 3D printing for protective gear. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering; 2019. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.1155/2019/5838361. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Lu QW, Macosko CW, Horrion J. Compatibilized blends of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and polypropylene. Macromolecular Symposia 2003;198:221–232.10.1002/masy.200350819 Search in Google Scholar

14. Mi HY, Salick MR, Jing X, et al. Characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane/polylactic acid (TPU/PLA) tissue engineering scaffolds fabricated by microcellular injection molding. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2013;33:4767–4776.10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.037455454224094186 Search in Google Scholar

15. Li W, Liu J, Hao C, et al. Interaction of thermoplastic polyurethane with polyamide 1212 and its influence on the thermal and mechanical properties of TPU/PA1212 blends. Polymer Engineering & Science 2008;48:249–256.10.1002/pen.20853 Search in Google Scholar

16. Feng F, Ye L. Morphologies and mechanical properties of polylactide/thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer blends. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2011;119:2778–2783.10.1002/app.32863 Search in Google Scholar

17. Rodríguez L, Naya G, Bienvenido R. Study for the selection of 3D printing parameters for the design of TPU products. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2021;1193:012035.10.1088/1757-899X/1193/1/012035 Search in Google Scholar

18. Schmid M, Amado A, Wegener K. Polymer powders for selective laser sintering (SLS). AIP Conference Proceedings; 1664. Epub ahead of print May 22, 2015. DOI: 10.1063/1.4918516. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Lupone F, Padovano E, Casamento F, et al. Process Phenomena and Material Properties in Selective Laser Sintering of Polymers: A Review. Materials 2022, 2021;15:183.10.3390/ma15010183874604535009332 Search in Google Scholar

20. Shen F, Yuan S, Guo Y, et al. Energy Absorption of Thermoplastic Polyurethane Lattice Structures via 3D Printing: Modeling and Prediction. International Journal of Applied Mechanics; 8. Epub ahead of print 2016. DOI: 10.1142/S1758825116400068. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Kanbur Y, Tayfun U. Development of multifunctional polyurethane elastomer composites containing fullerene: Mechanical, damping, thermal, and flammability behaviors. Journal of Elastomers and Plastics 2019;51:262–279.10.1177/0095244318796616 Search in Google Scholar

22. Beloshenko V, Beygelzimer Y, Chishko V, et al. Mechanical properties of flexible tpu-based 3d printed lattice structures: Role of lattice cut direction and architecture. Polymers (Basel) 2021;13:1–11.10.3390/polym13172986843362534503026 Search in Google Scholar

23. Ursini C, Collini L. Fdm layering deposition effects on mechanical response of tpu lattice structures. Materials; 14. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.3390/ma14195645.851026134640039 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Beloshenko V, Beygelzimer Y, Chishko V, et al. Mechanical Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane-Based Three-Dimensional-Printed Lattice Structures: Role of Build Orientation, Loading Direction, and Filler. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing 2021; 3dp.2021.0031.10.1089/3dp.2021.0031 Search in Google Scholar

25. Ponticelli GS, Tagliaferri F, Venettacci S, et al. Re-Engineering of an Impeller for Submersible Electric Pump to Be Produced by Selective Laser Melting. Applied Sciences 2021, Vol 11, Page 7375 2021;11: 7375.10.3390/app11167375 Search in Google Scholar

26. Hernández F, Fragoso A. Fabrication of a Stainless-Steel Pump Impeller by Integrated 3D Sand Printing and Casting: Mechanical Characterization and Performance Study in a Chemical Plant. Applied Sciences 2022;12:3539.10.3390/app12073539 Search in Google Scholar

27. Zglobicka I, Chmielewska A, Topal E, et al. 3D Diatom–Designed and Selective Laser Melting (SLM) Manufactured Metallic Structures. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:1–9.10.1038/s41598-019-56434-7693021231875023 Search in Google Scholar

28. Zaoui M, Mohamad BA, Amroune S, et al. Manufacturing of rapid prototypes of mechanical parts using reverse engineering and 3D Printing. J Serbian Soc Comput Mech 2021;15:1–10.10.24874/jsscm.2021.15.01.11 Search in Google Scholar

29. Subeshan B, Abdulaziz A, Khan Z, et al. Reverse Engineering of Aerospace Components Utilizing Additive Manufacturing Technology. 2022;238–246.10.1007/978-3-030-92381-5_21 Search in Google Scholar

30. Goodridge RD, Tuck CJ, Hague RJM. Laser sintering of polyamides and other polymers. Progress in Materials Science 2012;57:229–267.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.04.001 Search in Google Scholar

31. Gueche YA, Sanchez-Ballester NM, Cailleaux S, et al. Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), a New Chapter in the Production of Solid Oral Forms (SOFs) by 3D Printing. Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13: 1212.10.3390/pharmaceutics13081212839932634452173 Search in Google Scholar

32. Tagliaferri V, Trovalusci F, Guarino S, et al. Environmental and Economic Analysis of FDM, SLS and MJF Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Materials. 2019;12:4161.10.3390/ma12244161694715931835783 Search in Google Scholar

33. Kellens K, Renaldi R, Dewulf W, et al. Environmental impact modeling of selective laser sintering processes. Rapid Prototyping Journal 2014;20:459–470.10.1108/RPJ-02-2013-0018 Search in Google Scholar

34. ISO527-2: Plastics — Determination of tensile properties — Part 2: Test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics. International Standard. Search in Google Scholar

35. ISO 7743: Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic — Determination of compression stress-strain properties. International Standard; 2017. Search in Google Scholar

36. Bates SRG, Farrow IR, Trask RS. Compressive behaviour of 3D printed thermoplastic polyurethane honeycombs with graded densities. Materials and Design 2019;162:130–142.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.019 Search in Google Scholar

37. Additive Manufacturing solutions & industrial 3D printer by EOS, https://www.eos.info/en (accessed January 18, 2022). Search in Google Scholar

38. [Technology Applied - Zaufany dostawca części dla przemysłu, https://ta.parts/ (accessed January 18, 2022). Search in Google Scholar

39. EOS. Thermoplastisches Polyurethan EOS TPU 1301, https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:9OGEoHlUXOwJ: https://www.eos.info/03_system-related-assets/material-related-contents/polymer-materials-and-examples/tpu-1301/material_datasheet_eos_tpu_1301_core_de_web.pdf+&cd=3&hl=tr&ct=clnk&gl=pl&cl (accessed January 11, 2022). Search in Google Scholar