[
1. Abdallah I., Gehin A.-L., Bouamama B. O. (2016), Event driven hybrid bond graph for diagnosis, 2016 European Control Conference (ECC), 2353–2358.10.1109/ECC.2016.7810642
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Abid A., Khan M.T., Lang H., de Silva C.W. (2019), Adaptive system identification and severity index-based fault diagnosis in motors, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 24(4), 1628–1639.10.1109/TMECH.2019.2917749
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Achbi M.S., Kechida S. (2017), Hybrid dynamic systems fault diagnosis approach based on hybrid automata and ANFIS, The 2 Nd International Conference on Applied Automation and Industrial Diagnostics, ICAAID2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Achbi M.S., Kechida S. (2017a), Fault diagnosis of a reverse osmosis water desalination plant through a hybrid approach, ICENT2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Achbi M.S., Kechida S. (2017b), Fault tolerant control of Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plant with the application of SCADA system, The 2nd International Conference on Applied Automation and Industrial Diagnostics, ICAAID2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Achbi M.S., Kechida S. (2020), Methodology for monitoring and diagnosing faults of hybrid dynamic systems: A case study on a desalination plant, Diagnostyka, 21(1), 1641–6414.10.29354/diag/116076
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Achbi M.S., Mhamdi L., Kechida S., Dhouibi H. (2020), Methodology to knowledge discovery for fault diagnosis of hybrid dynamical systems: demonstration on two tanks system, Diagnostyka, 21.10.29354/diag/130617
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Alur R., Courcoubetis C., Henzinger T.A., Ho P.-H. (1992), Hybrid automata: An algorithmic approach to the specification and verification of hybrid systems, Hybrid systems, 209–229, Springer.10.1007/3-540-57318-6_30
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Antsaklis P., Koutsoukos X. (1997), On hybrid control of complex systems: A survey, ISIS, 97, 017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Asma T., Islem L., Zanzouri N., Ksouri M. (2015), Robust diagnosis for hybrid dynamical systems, 2015 IEEE 12th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals Devices (SSD15), 1–6.10.1109/SSD.2015.7348222
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Belkacem L., Mhamdi L., Simeu-Abazi Z., Messaoud H., Gascard E. (2016), Diagnosis of Hybrid Dynamical Systems through Hybrid Automata, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(12), 990–995.10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.571
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Belkhiat D E.C., Manamanni N., Messai N., Djemai M. (2012), Fault detection isolation for a class of hybrid systems: A dedicated switched robust observer scheme, 2012 20th Mediterranean Conference on Control Automation (MED), 984–989.10.1109/MED.2012.6265766
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Belkhiat D.E.C., Messai N., Manamanni N. (2011), Design of a robust fault detection based observer for linear switched systems with external disturbances, Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems, 5(2), 206–219.10.1016/j.nahs.2010.10.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Branicky M. S. (1995), Studies in hybrid systems: Modeling, analysis, and control, Massachusetts Inst Of Tech Cambridge Lab For Information And Decision Systems.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Chanthery E., Pencolé Y., Ribot P., Travé-Massuyès L. (2015), HYDIAG: Extended diagnosis and prognosis for hybrid systems.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Chanthery E., Sztyber A., Travé-Massuyès L., Pérez-Zuñiga C.G. (2020), Process decomposition and test selection for distributed fault diagnosis, International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, 914-925, Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-030-55789-8_78
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Cocquempot V., El Mezyani T., Staroswiecki M. (2004), Fault detection and isolation for hybrid systems using structured parity residuals, 2004 5th Asian Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No. 04EX904), 2, 1204–1212.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Daher A. (2018), Default diagnosis and prognosis for a preventive and predictive maintenance, Application to a distillation column [PhD Thesis].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Deng Y., D’Innocenzo, A., Julius A.A. (2015), Trajectory-based observer for hybrid automata fault diagnosis, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 942–947.10.1109/CDC.2015.7401994
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Derbel H. (2009), Diagnostic à base de modèles des systèmes temporisés et d’une sous-classe de systèmes dynamiques hybrides [PhD Thesis].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Ekanayake T., Dewasurendra D., Abeyratne S., Ma L., Yarlagadda P. (2019), Model-based fault diagnosis and prognosis of dynamic systems: A review, Procedia Manufacturing, 30, 435–442.10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.060
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Favela Contreras A. (1999), Modélisation et analyse du comportement dynamique des systèmes hybrides: Une approche basée sur le modèle d’automate hybride [PhD Thesis], Grenoble INPG.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Gara H., Saad K.B. (2020), Fault diagnosis for hybrid systems based on a bank of linear observers and a discrete automaton, SN Applied Sciences, 2(11), 1-9.10.1007/s42452-020-03564-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Guo D., Zhong M., Ji H., Liu Y., Yang R. (2018), A hybrid feature model and deep learning based fault diagnosis for unmanned aerial vehicle sensors, Neurocomputing, 319, 155-163.10.1016/j.neucom.2018.08.046
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Jang J.-S. (1992), Neuro-fuzzy modeling: Architectures, analyses, and applications, University of California, Berkeley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Karsai G., Abdelwahed, S., Biswas, G. (2003), Integrated diagnosis and control for hybrid dynamic systems, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 5673.10.2514/6.2003-5673
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Kechida S. (2007), Synthèse des générateurs de résidus robustes pour la détection de défauts [PhD Thesis], Université de Annaba-Badji Mokhtar.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Mahmoud M.S. (2018), Fuzzy control, estimation and diagnosis, Saudi Arabia: Springer International.10.1007/978-3-319-54954-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Mhamdi L., Achbi M. S., Dhouibi H., Kechida S. (2020), Diagnosis of hybrid systems through bond graph, observers and timed automata, Diagnostyka, 21.10.29354/diag/126444
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. MI Rahal B. (2018), Modeling and robust fault diagnosis of hybrid system based on hybrid bond graph approach, Int Rob Auto J, 4(4), 266–272.10.15406/iratj.2018.04.00135
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Olivier-Maget N., Hétreux G., Le Lann J.-M., Le Lann M.-V. (2008), Fault detection and isolation based on the model-based approach: Application on chemical processes, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 25, 411–416, Elsevier.10.1016/S1570-7946(08)80073-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Patel H.R., Raval S.K., Shah V.A. (2021), A novel design of optimal intelligent fuzzy TID controller employing GA for nonlinear level control problem subject to actuator and system component fault, International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics.10.1108/IJICC-11-2020-0174
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Pérez-Zuñiga G., Rivas-Perez R., Sotomayor-Moriano J., Sánchez-Zurita V. (2020), Fault Detection and Isolation System Based on Structural Analysis of an Industrial Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plant, Processes, 8(9), 1100.10.3390/pr8091100
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Pisano A., Rapaić M. R., Usai E. (2014), Discontinuous dynamical systems for fault detection, A unified approach including fractional and integer order dynamics, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 95, 111–125.10.1016/j.matcom.2012.09.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Pislaru M., Trandabat A.F., Schreiner C. (2006), Neuro-fuzzy surveillance for industrial process fault detection.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Rivas-Perez R., Sotomayor-Moriano J., Pérez-Zuñiga G., Soto-Angles M.E. (2019), Real-time implementation of an expert model predictive controller in a pilot-scale reverse osmosis plant for brackish and seawater desalination, Applied Sciences, 9(14), 2932.10.3390/app9142932
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Sadhukhan C., Mitra S.K., Naskar M.K., Sharifpur M. (2021), Fault diagnosis of a nonlinear hybrid system using adaptive unscented Kalman filter bank, Engineering with Computers, 1-12.10.1007/s00366-020-01235-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Sayed-Mouchaweh M. (2018), Fault diagnosis of hybrid dynamic and complex systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-74014-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Sengupta S., Mukhopadhyay S., Deb A., Pattada K., De S. (2012), Hybrid automata modeling of SI gasoline engines towards state estimation for fault diagnosis, SAE International Journal of Engines, 5(3), 759–781.10.4271/2011-01-2434
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Subbaraj P., Kannapiran B. (2011), Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system approach for fault detection and diagnosis of pneumatic valve in cement industry, International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 10(04), 399–423.10.1142/S1469026811003161
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Sun S., Cui Z., Zhang X., Tian W. (2020), A hybrid inverse problem approach to model-based fault diagnosis of a distillation column, Processes, 8(1), 55.10.3390/pr8010055
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Tabatabaeipour S., Ravn A.P., Izadi-zamabadi R., Bak T. (2009), Active diagnosis of hybrid systems—A model predictive approach, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation, 465–470.10.1109/ICCA.2009.5410420
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Tsuda K., Mignone D., Ferrari-Trecate G., Morari M. (2001), Reconfiguration strategies for hybrid systems, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 01CH37148), 2, 868–873.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Uppal F. J., Patton R. J., Palade V. (2002), Neuro-fuzzy based fault diagnosis applied to an electro-pneumatic valve, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 35(1), 477–482.10.3182/20020721-6-ES-1901.01633
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Van Gorp J. (2013), Diagnostic et observation d’une classe de systèmes dynamiques hybrids, Application au convertisseur multicellulaire série [PhD Thesis].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Vento Maldonado J., Travé-Massuyès L., Sarrate Estruch R., Puig Cayuela V. (2013), Hybrid automaton incremental construction for online diagnosis, Proceedings DX’13, 186–191.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Viharos Z. J., Kis K. B. (2015), Survey on neuro-fuzzy systems and their applications in technical diagnostics and measurement, Measurement, 67, 126–136.10.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Zhirabok A., Shumsky A. (2018), Fault diagnosis in nonlinear hybrid systems, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 28(4), 635–648.10.2478/amcs-2018-0049
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Zouaghi L., Alexopoulos A., Wagner A., Badreddin E. (2011), Modified particle petri nets for hybrid dynamical systems monitoring under environmental uncertainties, 2011 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), 497–502.10.1109/SII.2011.6147499
]Search in Google Scholar
