Accès libre

Effects of exposure to insecticides on sleep and neurobehavioural functioning in puberty and adolescence: a scoping review

, ,  et   
30 sept. 2025
À propos de cet article

Citez
Télécharger la couverture

Figure 1

Flow diagram of article search and selection
Flow diagram of article search and selection

Overview of assessment tools, study counts, and reported effects across core aspects of neurobehavioural functioning in studies on sleep and neurobehavioural outcomes of insecticide exposure (only adverse and null effect are shown, others are counted)

Core aspect of neurobehavioural functioning Abbr. Instruments (tests, subtests, tasks, questionnaires) n Adverse effects Null effect
N O T N O T N O T
Working memory/immediate (short-term) memory WM Digit Span1,2, Match-To-Sample1, Letter-Number Sequencing2, Picture Span2, Arithmetic2, Immediate Memory for Faces3, Object Memory4,14, Memory for Sentences5, Digit String5, Spatial Working Memory6, Registration7, Immediate Memory Span8, Children’s Memory Scale, Benton Visual Retention Test, Sternberg working memory task 22 9 31 32 % (7) 78 % (7) 45 % (14) 59 % (13) 22 % (2) 48 % (15)
Long-term memory/learning (includes visual, i.e., non-verbal, and verbal memory) LTM Serial Digit Learning1, Reverse Learning1, Narrative Memory3, Delayed Memory for Faces3, Object Memory4,14, Copying Recall5, Paired Associate Learning6, Recall7, Delayed Recall8, Level of Learning8, Children’s Memory Scale, Benton Visual Retention Test, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure, Long term memory task14 10 6 16 20 % (2) 67 % (4) 38 % (6) 80 % (8) 17 % (1) 56 % (9)
Visuospatial and visuomotor abilities VSVM Picture Completion2, Block Design2,*,14, Visual Puzzles2, Object Assembly2, Design Copying3, Geometric Puzzles3, Visual motor integration task4,14, Copying5, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure, Figure drawing14, Eye-Hand Coordination9 12 6 18 33 % (4) 17 % (1) 28 % (5) 67 % (8) 83 % (5) 72 % (13)
Attention and inhibitory control AIC Continuous Performance1, 12, Selective Attention1, Divided Attention1, Statue3, Auditory Attention & Response Set3, Inhibition3, Rapid Visual Information Processing6, Attention and Calculation7, Attention Network Test, Lewis Digit Vigilance Test 9 8 17 56 % (5) 50 % (4) 53 % (9) 33 % (3) 38 % (3) 35 % (6)
(Other) Executive functions EF Progressive Ratio1, Picture Arrangement2, Mazes2, Multi-tasking6, Orientation7, Trail Making Test, Wisconsin Card Sort Test, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function 8 8 16 75 % (6) 75 % (6) 75 % (12) 25 % (2) 25 % (2) 25 % (4)
Sensory and motor function SMF Visuomotor Precision3, Purdue Pegboard4, Santa Ana Form Board14, Pegboard11,14, Motor Screening6, Motor performance10, Name writing14, Finger Tapping1,14, Lanthony Desaturated D-15, Gross motor skills and balance14 11 7 18 45 % (5) 71 % (5) 56 % (10) 36 % (4) 29 % (2) 33 % (6)
Processing speed/reaction time PS Symbol Digit1, Simple Reaction Time1, Response Reaction6, Reaction Time Test14, (Digit Symbol) Coding2, Symbol Search2, Animals2, Cancellation2 12 9 21 58 % (7) 56 % (5) 57 % (12) 25 % (3) 33 % (3) 29 % (6)
Verbal ability VA Information2, Similarities2, Vocabulary2, Comprehension2, Comprehension of Instructions3, Speeded Naming3 14 5 19 50 % (7) 60 % (3) 53 % (10) 43 % (6) 40 % (2) 42 % (8)
Fluid reasoning FR Figure Weights2, Block Design2, Picture Concept2, Matrix Reasoning2, Series13, Classifications13, Matrices13, Conditions (topology)13 6 0 6 50 % (3) 0 % (0) 50 % (3) 50 % (3) 0 % (0) 50 % (3)
General intellectual functioning GIF Full scale IQ2, Total score3,10, Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices 14 0 14 57 % (8) 0 % (0) 57 % (8) 43 % (6) 0 % (0) 43 % (6)
Emotional and behavioural functioning EB Affect Recognition3, Behavior Assessment for Children 2nd edition, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Mood and Feelings Questionnaire – Child edition, Children’s Depression Inventory 2nd edition, Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children 2nd edition, Child Behavior Checklist, Conners’ Rating Scale – Revised Short Version, ADHD Criteria of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition, Self-Reported Delinquency and Self-Reported Behavior14, Parent–child difficulties checklist and parental involvement14 14 1 15 57 % (8) 100 % (1) 60 % (9) 14 % (2) 0 % (0) 13 % (2)
Sleep S Survey/questionnaire 2 0 2 50 % (1) 0 % (0) 50 % (1) 0 % (0) 0 % (0) 0 % (0)

Summary of studies investigating sleep and neurobehavioural effect of exposure to insecticides

Ref. Study design Country, region, cohort, and start year Sample size (% of boys) Groups Age range (years) Type of insecticide Exposure assessment Neurobehavioural assessment Main findings
Non-occupational (residential) exposure studies (82) CO China, Asia SMBCS 2009–2010 n=1266 mother-child pairs (54 %)

Formed a posteriori

1. Continuously low (n=197)

2. Early high (n=286)

3. Mid-term high (n=104)

1–10 (within subject) OP (chlorpyrifos, chlorpyrifos-methyl) and CARB (carbofuran) urinary OP (TCPy) and CARB (CFP) metabolites SDQ, Parent/caregiver assessment ADHD Criteria of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (ADHD-DSM-IV) rating scale Evidence of adverse effects on EB functioning in children with exposure during infancy and toddlerhood (↑OP metabolites)
(65) CS Ecuador, South America ESPINA 2008 n=313 (51 %) 4–9 mixture, including OP, NEO, and PYR residential proximity to crops (ArcGIS) NEPSY-II (AIC, L, ML, VP) Evidence of adverse effects on WM, LTM, AIC, VA, and GIF related to living in close proximity to greenhouse floricultural crops
(67) CS Ecuador, South America ESPINA 2008 n=313 (51 %) 4–9 OP, CARB AChE blood lev. (E); temporal proximity to heightened pesticide use; residential proximity to plantation (ArcGIS) NEPSY-II (AIC, L, ML, VP, SM) Evidence of adverse effects on VSVM, AIC, SMF, and GIF related to peak pesticide spray seasons in agricultural communities
(66) CS Ecuador, South America ESPINA 2008 n=313 (52 %) 4–9 OP/CARB AChE blood levels (E) NEPSY-II (AIC, L, ML, VP, SM) Evidence of adverse effects on LTM, AIC, and GIF related to ↓AChE activity in boys
(61) CS-pilot Costa Rica, North America 2007 n=35 (NR)

1. Children of farm owners in Las Mellizas, conventional farming (n=18)

2. Children of workers in La Amistad, organic coffee plantations (n=17)

4–10 OP, PYR urinary OP (PNP, IMPy, TCPy) & PYR (3-PBA) metabolites BARS (DST, TAP, MTS, CPT, DAT), Figure drawing, Long term memory test Conclusion could not be drawn based on reported data
(64) mixed Ecuador, South America ESPINA 2008 n=309 (50 %) T1 (2008): 4–9 years; T2&3 (2016): 11–17 years mixture, types not specified AChE blood levels (E); questionnaire; residential proximity to crops (ArcGIS); temporal proximity to heightened pesticide use NEPSY-II (AIC, L, ML, VP, SP) Evidence of adverse effects on VSVM, AIC, and VA lasting up to 90+ days after peak pesticide spray seasons
(55) CS-pilot Ecuador, South America n=79 mother-child dyads (47 %)

Formed a posteriori

1. Prenatally exposed (n=37)

2. Controls (n=35; no prenatal pesticide exposure)

5–8 OP AChE blood levels (E); urinary OP metabolites (DAPs); interview SRT, PEG-SA, DST (WISC-IV), Copying test (Stanford-Binet), FTT Prenatal exposure important risk factor. Current OP exposure (↑OP metabolites) only predicted poorer PS
(51) CO USA (Arizona), North America CPS 1998 n=48 (46 %)

1. Exposed before (n=25)

2. Non-exposed before (n=23)

5–9 OP urinary OP metabolites (DAPs) WISC-III SF, CMS, WCST, TMT; CBCL/4–18, TRF No strong evidence of adverse effects. Current OP exposure (↑OP metabolites) only predicted poorer EF
(72) CS USA (Pacific Northwest), North America 2008 n=215 parent-child pairs (54 %)

1. Agricultural families (n=122)

2. Non-agricultural (n=50)

5–12 OP pesticide concentrations (house dust samples) CBCL/6–18 Evidence of adverse effects on EB related to OP concentration in house dust
(56) CO USA (Pacific Nortwest), North America 2008 n=328 (55 %)

1. Agricultural group (n=155)

2. Non-agricultural (n=60)

5–12 OP OP residues (home carpet dust); questionnaire BARS (DST, TAP, MTS, SDT, CPT, DAT), OMT, PEG-P, VMI, Name writing; CBCL Evidence of adverse effects on AIC and SMF related to OP exposure in children from agricultural families. Mixed effects on WM
(53) CS Mexico, North America 2010 n=105 (51 %) 5–14 OP urinary OP metabolites (DAPs) WISC-IV (VIC, PRI, WMI, PSI, FSIQ) Evidence of adverse effects on WM, PS, VA, FR, and GIF related to OP exposure (↑OP metabolites) in children living in rural area
(59) CO Thailand, Asia n=54 (58 %)

1. Rice farming (n=24)

2. Aquaculture farming (n=29)

6–8 OP, PYR urinary OP (DAPs, TCPy) & PYR (3-PBA, DCCA) metabolites (TAP, DAT, DST, SDT, MTS, CPT), PENTB (PEG-P, VMI, OMT) Mixed effects related to OP and PYR exposure during high and low pesticide use season in aqua- and agriculture communities. ↑PYR metabolites predicted poorer PS and WM performance in certain instances, while ↑OP metabolites predicted improvement in AIC and SMF
(45) CS Ecuador, South America n=87 mother-child dyads (58 %)

Formed a posteriori

1. Prenatal maternal exposure (n=35)

2. Prenatal paternal exposure (n=23)

3. Controls (n=26; no prenatal pesticide exposure)

6–8 OP AChE blood levels (E); OP urinary metabolites (DAPs); interview FTT, PEG-SA, K-CPT, Stanford-Binet (Copying, Copying Recall, Memory for Sentences, Digit String), DST (WISC-IV), RCPM Prenatal exposure more harmful than current exposure. No evidence of adverse effects of current exposure
(52) CS Costa Rica, North America 2007 n=190 (49 %)

1. Large plantains using pesticides

2. Small plantains using pesticides

3. Small organic plantains

6–9 OP, PYR urinary OP (TCPy) & pyrethroids (3-PBA) metabolites WISC-IV (Block Design, Picture Concepts, Matrix Reasoning, DST, Letter Number Sequencing, Coding, Symbol Search, Cancellation); LDD-15, ROCF Copy and Delayed recall trials, CAVLT-2 (Immediate Memory Span, Delayed Recall, Level of Learning), DTVP-2, WRAVMA, RRT; CPRS-R Evidence of adverse effects on WM (in boys), VSVM, SMF, PS (in girls), and EB functioning related to OP and PYR exposure (↑OP & PYR metabolites) in children living near plantations
(47) CS Iran, Asia 2019 n=128 (45 %) 6–9 OP OP concentrations (ambient air samples; within a 50-meter radius from the greenhouse); residential proximity to the greenhouse (GPS) WISC-IV (VIC, PRI, WMI, PSI, FSIQ) Evidence of adverse effects on PS, VA, FR, and GIF related to greenhouse density
(83) CS Canada, North America CHMS, cycle 1 2007 n=1081 (51 %) 6–11 OP, PYR urinary OP (DAPs) & PYR metabolites (4-F-3-PBA, cis-DBCA, cis-DCCA, trans-DCCA, trans-DCCA) SDQ Evidence of adverse effects on EB functioning related to pesticide exposure (↑PYR metabolites; pesticide used to treat pets/head lice)
(73) CO UK, France, Spain, Lithuania, Norway, Greece, Europe HELIX study: BiB, EDEN, INMA, KANC, MoBa, Rhea 2013 n=1301 mother-child dyads (55 %) 6–11 OP urinary OP metabolites (DAPs) CBCL/6–18, CPRS-R; questionnaire items (sleep duration) Adverse effect on EB functioning related to prenatal exposure. Childhood exposure (↑OP metabolites) predicted better EB functioning
(85) CS UK, France, Spain, Lithuania, Norway, Greece, Europe HELIX study: BiB, EDEN, INMA, KANC, MoBa, Rhea 2013 n=1301 mother-child pairs (55 %) 6–11 OP urinary OP metabolites (DAPs) ANT and other tests (not described) No evidence of adverse effects
(50) CS-pilot Chile, South America n=25 (56 %)

1. Near agricultural land, Maule (n=15)

2. Not near agricultural land, Talca (n=10)

6–11 OP urinary OP metabolites (DAPs) levels; school location (urban or rural) WISC-III (VCI, POI, FDI, PSI, FSIQ) No strong evidence of adverse effects. ↑OP metabolite levels only predicted poorer PS
(44) A Spain, Europe 2009 n=315 mother-child dyads (51 %) 6–11 OP urinary OP metabolites (DAPs); questionnaire; pre- and postnatal residential proximity to crops WISC-IV (VIC, PRI, WMI, PSI, FSIQ) Evidence of adverse effects on GIF, VA, PS and FR related to high pesticide use season and OP exposure (↑OP metabolites), stronger in males
(69) CS Malaysia, Asia n=683 (50 %)

1. 7–8.5-year-olds (n=339)

2. 10–11-year-olds (n=344)

6–11 OP ChE blood levels WHO-NCTB (TMT), MSCA (motor scale) Evidence of adverse effects on SMF and EF related to ↓blood ChE levels
(68) CS Iran, Asia 2021 n=114 (50 %)

1. Exposed (agricultural regions; n=57)

2. Controls (urban areas; n=57)

6–13 OP pesticides concentration (hair samples) TMT A & B Evidence of adverse effects on EF related to OP concentration in hair, stronger in females
(80) CS Malaysia, Asia n=389 (20 %)

1. Children that live <100 m from paddy fields (n=227)

2. Children that live >1000 m from the agricultural site (n=162)

7–8.5 OP ChE blood levels; residential proximity to paddy fields MSCA Evidence of adverse effects on GIF related to ↓ ChE levels in children living in close proximity to agricultural fields
(42) CS Columbia, South America 2019 n=232 parent-child dyads (50 %) 7–10 mixture, containing primarily OP, PYR, fungicides questionnaire; info from stores about most bought pesticides in the area WISC-IV (VIC, PRI, WMI, PSI, FSIQ) Evidence of adverse effects on WM, VA, and PS (in girls) related to reported exposures at home or school
(118) CS Lebanon, Asia 2017 n=464 parent-child dyads (46 %) 7.5–13 mixture, types not specified questionnaire Cattell 2 test (Series, Classification-differences, Matrices, Conditions) No adverse effect
(43) CS USA (North Carolina), North America PACE5 2018–2019 n=141 (50 %)

1. Farmworking (n=76)

2. Non-farmworking (n=65)

8 OP, PYR passive pesticide exposure (silicone wristbands); questionnaires WISC-V (VCI, VSI, FRI, WMI, PSI, FSIQ) No evidence of adverse effects, except mixed effects observed on VA
(79) CS Indonesia, Asia n=56 (45 %) 9–11 OP AChE blood levels (E); questionnaire MMMSEC (orientation, attention, registration, recall, and language) Evidence of adverse effects on WM, EF, and GIF related to ↓AChE activity
(41) CS Egypt, Africa 2017 n=150 (0 %)

1. Exposed (n=100)

2. Controls (n=50)

9–18 primarily OP (chlorpyrifos) AChE blood levels (S); questionnaire WAIS (Information, Similarities, Arithmetic, Block Design, Digit Symbol, DST), BVRT, TMT, Santa A dexterity test, Beery Visual Motor Integration Test; questionnaire Evidence of adverse effects on WM, VSVM, EF, SMF, and VA in girls living in agricultural areas, related to para-occupational exposure, and ↓AChE levels
(49) CS-pilot Argentina, South America n=71 (49 %)

1. High risk of exposure, Yuto (n=42)

2. Low risk of exposure, León (n=29)

7–10 OP, CARB BChE (P) and AChE (E) blood levels; residential location (agricultural or livestock-farming area) WISC-III (DST, Digit-Symbol, Mazes), gross motor skills and balance tasks Mixed effects. Evidence of adverse effect on EF, and positive effect on SMF related to residential exposure to pesticides. Null effect on WM and PS
(81) mixed Ecuador, South America ESPINA 2008 n=545 (49 %) 11–17 OP/CARB AChE blood levels (E) CDI-2, MASC-2 Child self-report Evidence of adverse effects on EB functioning related to ↓AChE activity, especially in female and younger adolescents
(84) CS USA (Oklahoma), North America 2013 n=91 parent-youth dyads (60 %) M = 14.4 (1.7) PYR pesticide concentration (wipe samples from home) Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, Child version (MFQ-C); Parent–child difficulties checklist; Parental involvement (7 items) Evidence of adverse effects on EB functioning in adolescents related to PYR concentration in house dust
(76) CO Ecuador, South America ESPINA 2016 n=554 (49 %) 12–17 OP/CARB AChE blood levels (E) CDI-2, MASC-2 Child self-report Evidence of adverse effects on EB functioning related to ↓AChE activity, stronger in females and older adolescents
(115) CO USA (California), North America CHAMACOS 1999–2000 n=537 mother-child dyads (46 %) 14, 16, 18 (within subject) OP maternal and child urinary OP metabolites (DAPs) BASC-2: Parent form & Self-Report of Personality Evidence of adverse effects related to prenatal, but not childhood, OP exposure
(74) CS Spain, Europe INMA-Granada 2017 n=151 (100 %) 15–17 OP, PYR, CARB urinary OP (TCPy, IMPy, MDA, DETP, DEDTP), PYR (3-PBA, DCCA) and CARB (1-N) metabolites CBCL/6–18 Evidence of adverse effects on EB functioning related to exposure to a combination of insecticides (↑OP & PYR metabolites)
(54) CO USA (California), North America CHAMACOS 1999–2000 n=534 mother-child dyads (46 %) 16–17 OP maternal and child urinary OP metabolites (DAPs) WISC-IV (FSIQ), BRIEF; Self-Reported Delinquency and Self-Reported Behavior scales, Conner’s ADHD Index Limited evidence of adverse effects on EB functioning related to prenatal OP exposure only.
(116) CO USA (California), North America CHAMACOS 1999–2000 n=527 mother-child dyads & additional 305 dyads (in 2009–2011) (49 %) 16 & 18 (within subject)) neurotoxic pesticides, including OP, PYR, NEO, CARB residential proximity to agricultural pesticide use (within 1 km from home) BASC-2 Parent version, BASC-2 Self-Report of Personality Mixed evidence of adverse effects on EB functioning related to living in close proximity to agricultural pesticide use (OP, PYR, CA, NE) during both prenatal and early childhood (0–5 y) development
(75) CS USA (national, representative), North America NHANES 2007 n=17551 (899) (52 %) 16–20 PYR urinary PYR metabolites (3-PBA, Trans-DCCA, 4-F-3-PBA, Cis-DBCA) Questionnaire items (sleep disorder, trouble sleeping) Evidence of adverse effects on sleep related to PYR exposure (↑ PYR metabolites) in males
(70) CO USA (California), North America CHAMACOS 1999–2000 n=537 mother-child dyads (46 %) 18–19 OP OP metabolites (DAPs) WCST, Sternberg working memory test, Pyramids and Palm Trees Task No evidence of adverse effect related to prenatal and childhood exposure. In boys, childhood OP exposure (↑OP metabolites) only predicted worse WM
(71) CO USA (California), North America CHAMACOS 1999–2000 n=537 mother-child dyads (46 %) 18–19 OP maternal and child urinary OP metabolites (DAPs) WCST; Sternberg working memory task; Pyramids and Palm Trees No strong evidence of adverse effects related to prenatal or childhood OP exposure
(48) CS Argentina, South America n=87 (NR)

1. High exposure, Monterrico (n=31)

2. Medium exposure, Perico (n=33)

3. Low exposure, San Salvador de Jujuy (n=23)

11–16 OP, CARB BChE (P) and AChE (E) blood levels; residential location (rural, in close proximity to plantations, or urban) WISC (DST, Digit-Symbol), Lewis Digit Vigilance Test Evidence of adverse effects on WM, AIC, and PS (in moderate exposure group) related to residential exposure to pesticides
(78) CS South Africa, Africa CapSA 2017 n=1001 (47 %) 9–16 mixture, types not specified questionnaire CANTAB (MS, RR, SWM, PAL, MTT, RVP) Evidence of adverse effects on WM, LTM, EF, and SMF in children living on farms, related to eating crops and engaging in farm-related activities. Mixed effects on AIC
(40) CS Egypt, Africa 2005 n=100 (100 %)

1. Younger applicators (n=30)

2. Older applicators (n=20)

3. Younger controls (n=30)

4. Older controls (n=20)

9–18 primarily OP (chlorpyrifos) AChE blood levels (S/P); questionnaire WAIS (Information, Similarities, Arithmetic, Block Design, Digit Symbol, DST), BVRT, TMT; EPQ Evidence of adverse effects on WM, VSVM, EF PS, VA, and EB related to pesticide application and ↓ AChE levels
(58) CS Brazil, South America 2001 n=66 (55 %)

1. Rural residents (n=38)

2. Urban residents (n=28)

10–18 mixture, types not specified questionnaire; residential location (rural or urban) BARS (CPT, MTS, DST, PRT, SRT, SAT, SDL, SDT, TAP) Evidence of adverse effects on AIC, EF, SMF, and PS related to farming activities in younger adolescents. In whole sample, rural residents performed better on LTM than urban
(57) CO Egypt, Africa 2016 n=242 (100 %)

1. Applicators (n=177)

2. Non-applicator (n=65)

12–18 OP (chlorpyrifos) urinary OP (TCPy) metabolites over 1 year BARS (MTS, CPT, DST, SDT, SDL, TAP, SRT), Similarities, BVRT, TMT-A & -B, VMI, PEG-SA Evidence of adverse effects on WM, LTM, and SMF related to pesticide application (↑OP metabolites)
(46) CS Egypt, Africa 2005 & 2009 n=120 (100 %)

1. Applicators 2005 cohort (n=41)

2. Applicators 2009 cohort (n=21)

3. Non-applicators 2005 cohort (n=38)

4. Non-applicators 2009 cohort (n=20)

12–18 OP (primarily chlorpyrifos) BChE blood levels (S/WB); questionnaire BARS, BVRT, WAIS-R, TMT; Neurological assessment No strong evidence of adverse effects. ↓ BChE activity only predicted worse performance on EF.
(63) CS Egypt, Africa 2009 n=41 (100 %? NR)

1. Applicators (n=21)

2. Non-applicators (n=20)

12–18 OP (primarily chlorpyrifos) AChE (E) and BChE (P) blood levels; urinary OP metabolite (TCPy); questionnaire BARS (MTS, SDL, DST, CPT, SAT, TAP, SRT, SDT), BVRT, PEG-SA, TMT, Similarities, Block Design Evidence of adverse effects on WM, LTM, and VA in adolescent pesticide applicators
(60) CO Egypt, Africa 2010 n=84 (100 %? NR)

1. Applicators (n=46)

2. Non-applicators (n=38)

12–21 OP (primarily chlorpyrifos) AChE and BChE blood levels; urinary OP metabolite (TCPy) BARS (CPT, DST, SDT, TAP), PEG-SA, VMI, TMT, BVRT, Similarities, Block Design Evidence of adverse effects on WM, AIC, EF, SMF, PS, VA in adolescent pesticide applicators related to ↑OP metabolites and ↓AChE and BChE activity
(62) CO Egypt, Africa 2010 n=98 (100 %)

Formed a posteriori (TCPy concentrations):

1. High exposure (n=47)

2. Low exposure (n=42)

12–21 OP (primarily chlorpyrifos) urinary OP metabolite (TCPy); questionnaire BARS (TAP, SAT, DST, SDL, SDT, SRT, RLT), BVRT, TMT, PEG-SA, Similarities, Block Design, VMI Evidence of adverse effects on WM, LTM, AIC, EF, SMF, and PS in adolescents highly exposed to OP pesticides, especially during the application season
Langues:
Anglais, Croatian, Slovenian
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Médecine, Sciences médicales de base, Sciences médicales de base, autres