Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) produced by bacteria raise public health concern as they mediate the hydrolysis of important antibiotics, including cephalosporins, and aztreonam (1). Recent reports of ESBL-producing bacteria include
As ESBL-encoding genes are located on transferable plasmids, other bacterial species can also get them and become resistant to antibiotics to which they are otherwise susceptible. They are most often found in
However, what prompted our research had been recent reports of the global spread of ESBL-producing
Considering that reports from Eastern Europe are scarce and there are none from Bosnia and Herzegovina, we carried out this study with the aim to identify and analyse
Between September and October 2019, we took 108 faecal samples (cloacal swabs) from 25 poultry farms located in the Zenica-Doboj Canton (Bosnia and Herzegovina) for diagnostic laboratory investigations, including bacterial isolation and identification. Samples were cultured on blood and MacConkey agar supplemented with 3 mg/L of cefotaxime (Oxoid, Besingstoke, UK) to detect cefotaxime-resistant isolates (17). Using the standard microbiological methods and observing colony morphology and biochemical reactions with indole, Kligler Iron Agar (KIA), citrate agar, phenyl-alanine agar, and urease agar (18) all 27 non-copy isolates were identified as
Antimicrobial susceptibility of the 27 cefotaxime-resistant
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of amoxicillin alone and in combination with clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefazoline, extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs; ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone), cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, or ciprofloxacin were determined with the broth dilution test. The range of tested concentrations was 0.06 to 128 μg/mL.
ESBLs were screened for using the double-disk synergy test (DDST) as described elsewhere (20). Briefly, a disk containing amoxicillin with clavulanic acid is placed in the centre of the plate, and disks containing ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and cefepime 25 mm apart from the central disk. The test is considered positive if, after overnight incubation at 37 °C, the inhibition zone around cephalosporin disks extends towards the central disk with clavulanic acid.
ESBL production was confirmed with the combined disk test with cephalosporins and clavulanic acid according to CLSI (19). Briefly, the overnight broth culture of the test isolate was diluted to McFarland 0.5 turbidity and swabbed on Mueller-Hinton agar. Disks containing ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), and cefepime (30 μg) were placed on the surface of the agar plate, and 10 μL of clavulanic acid (10 g/L) was dropped on the disks. The control disks contained the same antibiotics but without clavulanate. ESBL production was confirmed if the inhibition zones around ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and cefepime disks with clavulanic acid were at least 5 mm wider in diameter than around control disks without it.
Cefotaxime hydrolysis by ESBL was tested with the cephalosporin inactivation method (CIM) as originally described for carbapenem inactivation testing (21). Briefly, disks containing cefotaxime (10 mg) were placed in a heavy suspension of the test strains and the samples were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Disks were then taken out and placed on the Mueller-Hinton agar previously inoculated with
Four cefoxitin-resistant isolates were tested for plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases using the combined disk test with cephalosporin and 3-aminophenylboronic acid (PBA) disks as described elsewhere (22). Briefly, overnight broth culture of the test isolate was diluted to the 0.5 McFarland turbidity and swabbed on Mueller-Hinton agar. Disks containing ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), and cefepime (30 μg) were placed on the surface of the agar plate and 10 μL of pAmpC-inhibiting PBA was dropped on the disks. The control disks contained the same antibiotics without PBA. The test was considered positive if the inhibition zone around PBA was at least 5 mm longer in diameter than the respective control disk.
The conjugation experiment was performed by “mating” the experimental
The DNA was extracted using the heat lysis protocol as described elsewhere (24). Briefly a heavy suspension of the tested strains prepared in 500 μL of ultrapure water was boiled at 95 °C for 15 min and then spun at 6720
Genes coding for broad and extended-spectrum β-lactamases (
Primers for ESBL detection with PCR
Primer designation | Target gene | Sequence | Amplicon size | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
OT 3 | TEM | 5’-ATG-AGT-ATT- CAA-CAT-TTC-CG-3’ | 850 | 25 |
OT 4 | TEM | 5’-CCA-ATG-CTT-AAT-CAG-TGA-GG-3’ | 850 | 25 |
SHV-F | SHV | 5’-TTC-GCC-TGT-GTA-TTA-TCT-CCC-3 | 1000 | 26 |
SHV-R | SHV | 5’-TTA-GCG-TTG-CCA-GTG-YTC-GAT-3’ | 1000 | 26 |
MA-1 | CTX-M | 5’-SCS-ATG-TGC-AGY-ACC-AGT-AA-3’ | 550 | 27 |
MA-2 | CTX-M | 5’-CGC-CRA-TAT-GRT-TGG-TGG-TG-3’ | 550 | 27 |
M1-F | CTX-M-1 cluster | 5’-AAA-AAT-CAC-TGC-GCC-AGT--TC-3’ | 415 | 30 |
M1-R | CTX-M-1 cluster | 5’-TTG-GTG-ACG-ATT-TTA-GCC-GC-3’ | 415 | 30 |
M2-F | CTX-M-2 cluster | 5’-CGA-CGC-TAC-CCC-TGC-TAT-T--3’ | 552 | 30 |
M2-R | CTX-M-2 cluster | 5’-CCA-GCG-TCA-GAT-TTT-TCA-GG-3’ | 552 | 30 |
M8-F | CTX-M-8 cluster | 5-TCG-CGT-TAA-GCG-GAT-GAT-GC | 666 | 30 |
M9-F | CTX-M-9 cluster | 5’-CAA-AGA-GAG-TGC-AAC-GGA-TG | 205 | 30 |
M9-R | CTX-M-9 cluster | 5’ATT-GGA-AAG-CGT-TCA-TCA-CC | 205 | 30 |
M25-F | CTX-M-25 cluster | 5’GCA-CGA-TGA-CAT-TCG-GG | 327 | 30 |
M9/M25-R | CTX-M-8/25 clusters | 5’AAC-CCA-CGA-TGT-GGG-TAG-C | 30 | |
IS26-F | IS26 | 5’-AAA-AAT-GAT-TGA-AAG-GTG-GT-3’ | 31 | |
IS26-R | IS26 | 5’-ATT-CGG-CAA-GTT-TTT-GCT-GT-3 | 31 | |
IS |
IS |
5’-AAA-AAT-GAT-TGA-AAG-GTG-GT-3’ | 31 | |
IS |
IS |
5’-AAT-ACT-ACC-TTG-CTT-TCT-GA-3’ | 31 | |
QNR A-F | QNR A | 5’-ATT-TCT-CAC-GCC-AGG-ATT-TG-3’ | 29 | |
QNR A-R | QNR A | 5’-GAT-CGG-CAA-AGG-TTA-GGT-CA-3’ | 29 | |
QNR B-F | QNR B | 5’-GAT-CGT-GAA-AGC-CAG-AAA-GG | 29 | |
QNR B-R | QNR B | 5’-ACG-ATG-CCT-GGT-AGT-TGT-CC | 29 | |
QNR S-F | QNR S | 5’-ACG-ACA-TTC-GTC-AAC-TGC-AA | 29 | |
QNR S-R | QNR S | 5’-TAA-ATT-GGC-ACC-CTG-TAG-GC | 29 |
The genetic context of
Plasmids were extracted with the Qiagen Plasmid Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (33). To identify plasmids coding for ESBLs we relied on PCR-based replicon typing (PBRT) as described by Carattoli et al. (34) updated to identify and distinguish between IncL and IncM plasmids (35). Five multiplex (I, II, III, IV, and V) and two simplex (B and K) reactions were used to determine the incompatibility group based on the size of the product after gel electrophoresis and staining with ethidium bromide. Plasmid extractions from donor and transconjugant strains were subjected to PCR for detection of
Two randomly selected isolates were genotyped with multilocus sequence typing (MLST) as described by Wirth et al. (36). Seven housekeeping genes were amplified with PCR, namely
PCR products were detected with agarose gel electrophoresis and then purified and sequenced using the Eurofins service. The obtained sequences were deposited by above mentioned online service to obtain sequence types (STs).
Of the 108 cloacal swabs taken from poultry farms, 75 (69.4 %) had
Antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentrations, genes, plasmids, and genotyping of
No. | Protocol number | Minimum inhibitory concentrations (mg/L) and resistance breakpoint (≥) of antibiotics | Genes, plasmids, and genotypes | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMX >32 | AMC 128/16 | TZP >128/4 | CZ >4 | CXM >32 | CAZ >32 | CTX >4 | CRO >4 | FEP >32 | IMI >4 | MEM >4 | GM >16 | CIP >4 | ESBL | PBI and ST | |||
31 | >128 | 8 | 32 | >128 | >128 | 64 | >128 | >128 | 64 | 0.5 | 0.25 | >128 | >128 | + | TEM, CTX-M-15 | FIA | |
32 | >128 | 32 | 8 | >128 | 32 | 0.5 | 32 | 32 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 2 | 0.25 | + | ND | ND | |
35 | >128 | 1 | 2 | >128 | >128 | 2 | >128 | >128 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.5 | 2 | + | CTX-M-1 cluster | FIA | |
36 | >128 | 4 | 8 | >128 | >128 | 2 | 64 | 64 | 1 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.25 | + | CTX-M-1 cluster | FIB, ST 117 | |
37 | >128 | 8 | 16 | >128 | >128 | 1 | >128 | 64 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.5 | + | ND | FIB | |
39 | >128 | 4 | 8 | >128 | >128 | 2 | 64 | 64 | 0.5 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 2 | 0.12 | + | TEM, CTX-M-15 | ND | |
40 | >128 | 8 | 4 | >128 | >128 | 0.5 | >128 | >128 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.25 | + | ND | ND | |
41 | >128 | 1 | 4 | >128 | 32 | 1 | 64 | 32 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 2 | 0.25 | + | CTX-M-1 cluster | ND | |
43 | >128 | 16 | 16 | >128 | >128 | 8 | >128 | >128 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 4 | 0.06 | + | ND | ND | |
44 | >128 | 32 | 16 | >128 | >128 | 32 | >128 | >128 | 2 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.12 | + | ND | FIB | |
45 | >128 | 16 | 16 | >128 | >128 | 1 | >128 | >128 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 2 | 0.12 | + | CTX-M-1 cluster | ND | |
46 | >128 | 8 | 4 | >128 | >128 | 2 | >128 | 64 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 4 | 0.06 | + | TEM, CTX-M-1 cluster | ND | |
47 | >128 | 8 | 8 | >128 | >128 | 16 | 64 | 64 | 1 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.25 | + | TEM, CTX-M-1 cluster | I1 | |
49 | >128 | 4 | 16 | >128 | >128 | 4 | >128 | >128 | 16 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0,5 | 16 | + | TEM, CTX-M-1 cluster | I1 | |
50 | >128 | 8 | 16 | >128 | >128 | 8 | >128 | >128 | 16 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 2 | 64 | + | TEM, CTX-M-15 | I1, FIB | |
51 | >128 | 2 | 4 | >128 | >128 | 0.5 | >128 | >128 | 0.5 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 2 | 0.25 | + | ND | FIB | |
53 | >128 | 2 | 4 | >128 | >128 | 8 | >128 | >128 | 8 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.25 | + | TEM, CTX-M-15 | ND | |
54 | >128 | 4 | 2 | >128 | >128 | 1 | >128 | 64 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.12 | + | TEM, CTX-M-15 | I1, FIB | |
55 | >128 | 1 | 2 | >128 | >128 | 1 | >128 | >128 | 2 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.5 | 0.5 | + | TEM, CTX-M-1 cluster | I1 | |
56 | >128 | 4 | 32 | >128 | >128 | 16 | >128 | >128 | 16 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 2 | 4 | + | TEM, CTX-M-1 cluster | I1, HI1 | |
58 | >128 | 2 | 2 | >128 | >128 | 2 | >128 | >128 | 8 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.25 | + | CTX-M-1 cluster | ND | |
59 | >128 | 32 | 4 | >128 | 64 | 0.5 | >128 | 64 | 0.5 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 16 | 32 | + | TEM, CTX-M-1 cluster | I1 | |
60 | >128 | 32 | 16 | >128 | >128 | 16 | >128 | 32 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 1 | 32 | + | CTX-M-1 cluster | I1, HI1, ST155 | |
64 | >128 | 32 | 64 | >128 | 16 | >128 | >128 | 32 | 4 | 1 | 0.5 | 2 | >128 | + | TEM, CTX-M,-1 cluster | I1, FIB | |
65 | >128 | 4 | 8 | >128 | >128 | 2 | 64 | 32 | 2 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.12 | + | TEM, CTX-M-1 cluster | I1 | |
66 | >128 | 32 | 4 | >128 | 32 | >128 | >128 | 16 | 1 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.5 | 64 | + | TEM, CTX-M-1 cluster | FIB | |
69 | >128 | 8 | 2 | >128 | >128 | 2 | >128 | >128 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0.12 | + | CTX-M-15 | FIA |
AMX – amoxicillin; AMC – amoxicillin/clavulanic; acid; TZP – piperacillin/tazobactam; CZ – cefazolin; CXM – cefuroxime; CAZ – ceftazidime; CTX – cefotaxime; CRO – ceftriaxone; FEP – cefepime; IMI – imipenem; MEM – meropenem; GM – gentamicin; CIP – ciprofloxacin; ESBL – inhibitor based test with clavulanic acid for detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases; BL – beta–lactamase content; PBI – plasmid incompatibility group, ST – sequence type; ND – not detected
Cefoxitin, amikacin, ertapenem, and cotrimoxazole showed good activity with the disk-diffusion method (Table 3).
Antibiotic susceptibility of
Isolate No. | Protocol number | Disk-diffusion method | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOX | AMI | ERT | SXT | ||
31 | S | S | S | R | |
32 | S | S | S | S | |
35 | S | S | S | S | |
36 | S | S | S | S | |
37 | S | S | S | S | |
39 | S | S | S | S | |
40 | S | S | S | S | |
41 | S | S | S | S | |
43 | S | S | S | S | |
44 | S | S | S | S | |
45 | S | S | S | S | |
46 | S | S | S | S | |
47 | S | S | S | S | |
49 | S | S | S | S | |
50 | S | S | S | S | |
51 | S | S | S | S | |
53 | S | S | S | S | |
54 | S | S | S | S | |
55 | S | S | S | S | |
56 | S | S | S | R | |
58 | R | S | S | S | |
59 | S | S | S | S | |
60 | R | S | S | S | |
64 | R | S | S | S | |
65 | S | S | S | S | |
66 | R | S | S | S | |
69 | S | S | S | S |
AMI – amikacin; ERT – ertapenem; FOX – cefoxitin; R – resistant; S – susceptible; SXT – sulphametoxazole-trimethoprim
All cefotaxime-resistant isolates tested positive for ESBLs with both the DDST (Figure 1) and combined disk test (Figure 2), with the enlargement of the inhibition zones around cephalosporins ranging from 5 to 22 mm in the presence of clavulanic acid. The CIM test (Figure 3) confirmed production of ESBL in all tested organisms, with no inhibition zone around cefotaxime disks. Four isolates demonstrated resistance to cefoxitin and were positive in the combined disk test with cloxacillin, with inhibition zones ranging from 10 to 14 mm, which pointed to pAmpC (Figure 4).
Eighteen of the 27 isolates transferred cefotaxime resistance to the
Conjugation frequency and cotransferred resistance markers
Isolate No. | Protocol number | Frequency | Cotransferred resistance markers |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 31 | 8×10-5 | Gm, Smx |
2 | 32 | 5.5×10-4 | |
3 | 35 | 3.5×10-5 | |
4 | 36 | 1.2×10-4 | |
5 | 37 | 1.4×10-5 | |
6 | 39 | 8.4×10-5 | |
7 | 40 | 4.5×10-5 | |
8 | 41 | 0 | |
9 | 43 | 10-4 | Tet |
10 | 44 | 5×10-4 | Tet |
11 | 45 | 1.6×10-6 | Tet |
12 | 46 | 4.5×10-6 | Tet |
13 | 47 | 1.6×10-4 | Tet |
14 | 49 | 0 | |
15 | 50 | 0 | |
16 | 51 | 7.2×10-6 | Smx |
17 | 53 | 1.57×10-5 | |
18 | 54 | 0 | |
19 | 55 | 5.6×10-6 | |
20 | 56 | 0 | |
21 | 58 | 0 | |
22 | 59 | 0 | |
23 | 60 | 0 | |
24 | 64 | 1.5×10-4 | |
25 | 65 | 1.2×10-4 | |
26 | 66 | 3.1×10-5 | Tet |
27 | 69 | 0 |
Gm – gentamicin; Smx – sulphamethoxazole-trimetoprim; Tet – tetracycline
PCR identified
The most frequent plasmid incompatibility group was IncFIB, identified in eight isolates, followed by IncFIA (n=3) and Inc HI1 (n=2) (Table 2). Plasmids were not found in nine isolates.
Two different STs were identified: ST117 (
Unlike some other studies (11, 12), we found only the CTX-M-1 cluster β-lactamases, which corresponds to those found in
Whichever the direction, transmission between humans and broilers can occur at any point, even without antibiotic pressure, and therefore presents a serious public health issue (41).
Even though the CTX-M-1 cluster was dominant in our poultry isolates, similar to the report in broilers and humans working on the farms in the Netherlands (42, 43) and Hungary (44), the MICs of ceftazidime much lower than those reported in human isolates, and resistance to non-β-lactam antibiotics, usually mediated by the same plasmids coding for ESBLs, was rare.
Six isolates were phenotypically positive for ESBLs, but yielded no product with primers specific for common types of ESBLs, as they produced either rare ESBL types (like VEB, GES, or IBC) not analysed in our study or false positive results.
To our surprise, we found IS
Four isolates in our study exhibited cefoxitin resistance and tested positive in inhibitor-based test with PBA, which points to the production of pAmpC, but the PCR for common AmpC β-lactamases was negative. This points to the low specificity of phenotypic tests. Similarly, nine isolates exhibited resistance to ciprofloxacin, but the PCR for
Five isolates were resistant to a combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, but we found no inhibitor-resistant TEMs. This resistance may therefore be owed to ESBL overexpression reported in human CTX-M producing
IncI1 plasmid identified in some of the isolates and their transconjugants was previously identified in TEM-52-producing
The same plasmid showed co-transfer of tetracycline resistance. This warrants for caution in the application of tetracycline in chicken food, as it can exert selection pressure for the transfer of ESBL-encoding plasmids.
In this study, two different STs were found: ST117 and ST155.
This study showed that chickens act as a reservoir of ESBL-producing strains and pose a health risk to humans. Interestingly, the isolates possessed the same ESBLs as previously reported in humans from the same region. Although epidemiological links are likely to exist between livestock and farm workers, one limitation of our study is that it did not look for human ESBL-producing
Even with these limitations, however, our study provides a detailed molecular analysis of resistance determinants from a lot of farms, and therefore an insightful overview of ESBL distribution in Bosnian and Herzegovinian poultry. It also highlights the need for parallel studies of antimicrobial resistance in humans and animals. With that in mind, our future research will involve human subjects working with livestock to compare human and animal isolates and gauge the threat for public health.