Different species of the genus
At the beginning of the twentieth century, the medicinal use of cannabis had largely declined (1), but the discovery of the endocannabinoid system has recently revived interest in the potential therapeutic use of various cannabinoid derivatives (4). The problem, however, is the abuse of cannabis over its psychotropic effects. As it may pose a serious risk to public health, it has long been regulated by legislation, and cannabis and phytocannabinoid-containing products are the most commonly used illicit drugs in the world. However, laws regulating the safe use of phytocannabinoids differ greatly between countries, reflecting a variety of historical and cultural backgrounds (3, 4). The aim of this article is to review current legislation, focusing on the use of medicines and cannabis cultivation in the European Union (EU) and to show in what areas the legislation of medicinal products containing cannabinoids varies across EU countries, leading to different accessibility to these products.
Ever since the nineteenth century approval of the use of cannabis tincture to relieve pain and nausea in Britain (5), most countries allow medicinal use of cannabinoids as one of the legal treatment options (1). By definition, cannabinoids are substances that bind the cannabinoid receptors of the body and trigger similar effects to those evoked by the plant
Authorised cannabis-based medicines in the EU member states in 2018
INN Form | Description | Availability | Indications Strength of evidence | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Most EU member states except: | ||||
Nabiximols |
Extract of cannabis: |
Bulgaria |
Muscle spasm in multiple sclerosis |
1, 24 |
Dronabinol |
Synthetic Δ9-THC | Croatia |
AIDS related wasting |
1, 25 |
Nabilone |
Synthetic cannabinoid, similar to Δ9-THC | Austria |
Nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy |
1, 26 |
Cannabidiol |
Extract of cannabis: CBD | Authorised for use in all EU member states in 2019 asorphan medicinal product | Intractable childhood epilepsy (Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome) |
22, 23 |
INN – international nonproprietary name
Legislation on cannabis issues is nearly 100 years old. When cannabis came under international control under the revised International Opium Convention of 1925, it was referred to as ‘Indian hemp’. The Convention referred only to the dried tops of the pistillate plant, particularly rich in ‘pharmaceutically strong active resin’ and banned the export of cannabis resin to countries that prohibited its use and established domestic control, such as penalties for unauthorised possession of cannabis extract and tincture. The Convention also proposed that any breaches of national laws should be penalised (14).
Three United Nations (UN) conventions, signed by all EU member states, outline the basic framework for controlling the production, trade, and possession of over 240 psychoactive substances, many of which have therapeutic potential. These conventions classify narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, including cannabis, according to their danger to health, risk of abuse, and therapeutic value.
The first, 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (15), classified narcotic drugs and seeks to combat drug abuse through concerted international measures. It proposed two forms of intervention and control with the aim to: a) limit the possession, use, trade, distribution, import, export, and production of drugs exclusively for medical and scientific purposes; and b) combat drug trafficking through international cooperation. The Convention did not differ between industrial hemp and medicinal cannabis and classified cannabis in Schedule I as a substance presenting a serious risk of abuse, whose properties give rise to dependence. Cannabis was also included in Schedule IV among the most dangerous substances due to their particularly harmful characteristics, the risks of abuse, and limited therapeutic value. This significantly limited the use of cannabis and cannabinoids for medicinal purposes, which has later raised a number of controversies (16).
The 1971 UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances (17) included new, synthetic drugs of abuse, such as synthetic cannabinoids, taking into account their abuse potential as well as their therapeutic value.
The 1988 UN Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (18) has established comprehensive international measures against drug trafficking, money laundering, and abuse of drug precursors. The Convention also binds member countries to prevent illicit cannabis cultivation and to eradicate cannabis plants on their territory.
These three conventions, however, do not specify that drug use should be a punishable offence. Instead, each country is free to regulate this issue. In addition, the conventions do not associate drug types with the severity of penalties and even though the schedules affect the procedures for the legal trade of the drugs, the countries are not bound to use them.
International drug control has evolved, and nowadays it does not ban cannabis or cannabis-based product use in medicine to treat specific indications. While international law provides a general regulatory framework for the cultivation and marketing of cannabis, the EU law sets the criteria for medicinal products, including those containing cannabinoids, to be authorised for marketing in the EU member states. However, magistral and officinal formulas are exempt from the EU marketing authorisation rules and are left to the care of the EU member states. This eventually leads to different access for patients to these medicinal products containing cannabinoids in the EU countries.
Cannabis and cannabinoids have their place in pharmacotherapy in the EU member states. They are mostly indicated for treating chronic pain, nausea, and vomiting due to chemotherapy or to relax muscle stiffening caused by multiple sclerosis (7, 19, 20). They occur in various formulations, yet some products have a marketing authorisation for medicinal use and others do not (Figure 1) (1).
The EU legal framework for authorised medicinal products for human use has been laid down by the Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and its amendments (21). All of the cannabinoid-based medicines that pass the centralised procedure for marketing authorisation can be marketed in all the EU member states and prescribed by physicians according to their approved indications and posology. So far, only one cannabinoid-based product with a trade name Epidyolex (containing 10 % of CBD isolated from cannabis) has been approved for the treatment of intractable childhood epilepsy by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2019 and received the orphan drug designation in 2014 (Table 1) (22, 23).
Beside the centralised EMA procedure for marketing authorisation, cannabinoid-based products can be authorised through a decentralised procedure, mutual recognition procedure, or national procedures of the member states, which limit their use to the market of the member state involved in the procedure. Having a marketing authorisation implies that the product has been tested for safety and efficacy through extensive non-clinical and clinical trials. Regulatory authorities also consider whether the product meets the required level of quality. So far, there are but a few authorised medicinal products containing nabiximols, dronabinol, or nabilone on the EU member state markets (Table 1) (22, 23, 24, 25, 26). Other cannabinoid-based medicines are in different stages of development but have not yet been authorised for marketing.
According to its article 3, the Directive 2001/83/EC (21) does not apply to magistral and officinal formulas and leaves their regulation to the jurisdictions of member states, which may include a wide range of cannabinoid-containing products (1).
In most EU countries this exemption enables pharmacists to prepare magistral formulas for use in accordance with a specified medical prescription for an individual patient. It also allows the production of larger batches (officinal formulas, aka stock or standardised preparations) in accordance with national pharmacopoeia or national formularies. Although it is uncommon in the EU member states to use raw cannabis for medicinal purposes, some countries allow patients access to officinal cannabis preparations such as Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherland, Poland, and Sweden (1, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31). Magistral preparations are also available through special access schemes in Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands and through exceptional/compassionate use programmes in Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Poland, and Sweden. These approaches enable medical approval and oversight, limit medicinal use to a specific set of medical conditions, and generally restrict the use of cannabis preparations. Their use may further be restricted by lack of health insurance coverage, as national regulatory frameworks are not always clear about how officinal and magistral preparations should work in practice. For example, officinal (standard) preparations in Estonia need approval by the Estonian State Agency of Medicines; in Finland, officinal preparations with nabiximols are allowed; in Sweden, only a small number of patients are granted permission to use cannabis preparations (1). In addition, some EU member states like Germany have pharmacopoeias and/or formularies (32) which include monographs for the preparation of cannabis extracts, and some like Slovenia do not. This is why magistral and officinal formulas cannot be prescribed in Slovenia (33, 34) and can in Germany. These discrepancies could be overcome by harmonising relevant European pharmacopoeia monographs.
International law does not ban the cultivation of cannabis for medicinal use. Instead, the 1961 UN Convention provides a general system of control, if a country decides to grant cannabis cultivation not intended for industrial or horticultural purposes. Each country has the exclusive right to buy the entire cannabis production on its territory (15). Cultivation and primary processing of cannabis directly influence the quality of active pharmaceutical ingredients and should therefore comply with the provisions of the UN Conventions and the WHO guidelines of good agricultural and collection practices (35) for medicinal plants. For the EU member states EMA additionally provides Guidelines on Good Agricultural and Collection Practices (GACP) (36) that include a system of quality control of medicinal plants and herbal substances from cultivation to distribution.
Cultivation of medicinal cannabis in the EU is currently allowed in Austria, Czech Republic, Italy, Germany, Greece, Malta, the Netherlands, and Portugal. All of these member states have established an authority for cannabis cultivation and defined their responsibilities as summarised in Table 2 (1, 27, 37, 38, 39, 40).
Medicinal cannabis cultivation in the EU member states in 2018
EU member state | Responsible authority for medicinal cannabis cultivation | Responsibilities | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Austria | Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety | It is responsible for the production of medicinal cannabis, purchases cannabis and ensures its distribution and export. | 1, 40 |
Czech Republic | State Agency for Medical Cannabis established within the State Institute of Drug Control | It is responsible for licensing of medicinal cannabis cultivation, purchases cannabis and ensures its distribution and export. |
1, 40 |
Italy | Italian Ministry of Health | It is the coordinating body for medical cannabis and has the responsibility to issue permits for cultivation, production, possession, and use of cannabis. It supervises the conditions for the cultivation of cannabis for medical purposes and has an exclusive right of redemption and resale cannabis. | 1, 40 |
Germany | Medical Cannabis Agency, established within the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) | It selects breeders who meet the required conditions; contracts with them in which the obligations of the breeders are defined; exercise the control over breeders who, in case of breach of contractual provisions, lose the right to grow; has the exclusive right to buy and sell resin cannabis. | 1, 29, 40 |
Greece | Ministry of Health, Greek National Organization for Medicines | It is responsible for licencing of medicinal cannabis cultivation and production (first two licences were granted to private companies Bioprocann SA and Biomecann). | 38 |
Malta | Maltese Ministry of Health | It is responsible for licensing of medicinal cannabis cultivation, monitoring, purchasing, distribution, import, export, and destruction of cannabis. | 37 |
Nederlands | Office of Medicinal Cannabis of the Netherlands government | It is responsible for controlling of greenhouse cultivation with controlled conditions (GMP); analytical testing; packaging and distribution of cannabis to authorized pharmacies. | 1, 40 |
Portugal | Instituto Nacional da Farmacia e do Medicament (INFARMED) | It is responsible for licencing of medicinal cannabis cultivation, manufacturing, processing and distribution. | 39 |
Hemp can also be cultivated in the EU for food, provided that it is registered in the EU’s Common Catalogue of Varieties of Agricultural Plant Species (41) and that its THC content does not exceed 0.2 % w/w. Furthermore, in the Novel Food catalogue (42) the EC has listed
The growing interest in the use of cannabis and cannabinoid products forces countries to regulate cultivation and safe use of cannabis and its products for medicinal use. The basic regulatory framework is provided by the UN conventions, whereas the EU legislation covers only medicinal products that have been authorised for marketing. The regulation of cannabinoid-containing products without marketing authorisation – magistral and officinal (standardised) preparations – is left to each EU member state and is quite uneven across the EU, mainly due to cultural and historical differences between the countries. There are different approaches to this kind of regulation that cannot be easily transferred from one EU country to another, yet uneven availability of cannabinoid-containing medicinal products calls for some harmonisation of these approaches to level the playing field and avoid issues such as cross-border patient access where EU countries have different regulatory schemes.