Complications of Transrectal Prostate Biopsy

1. Klečka J, Holubec L, Pešta M, Hora M, Topolčan O, Eret V. Nádorové markery karcinómu prostaty. Ces Urol 2008; 12(3): 173-185.Search in Google Scholar

2. Sigebara K, Miyagi T, Nakashima T, Shimamura M. Acute bacterial prostatitis after transrectal nedele biopsy: clinical analysis. J Clin Chemother 2008; 14: 40-43.Search in Google Scholar

3. Webb NR, Woo HH. Antibiotic prophylaxis for prostate biopsy. BJU International 2002; 89: 824-828.10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02735.xSearch in Google Scholar

4. EAU Guidelines 2013; Prostate cancer; 6. p: 18.Search in Google Scholar

5. Ecke TH, Gunia S, Bartel P, Hallmann S, Koch S, Ruttloff J. Complications and risk factors of transrectal ultrasound guided nedele biopsies of the prostate evaluated by questionnaire. Urol Oncol 2008; 26: 474-478.10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.12.003Search in Google Scholar

6. Sieber P, Rommel F, Theodoran C. Contemporary prostate biopsy complication rates in community-based urology practice. Urology 2007; 70(3): 498-500.10.1016/j.urology.2007.04.019Search in Google Scholar

7. Ghani K, Dundas D, Patel U. Bleeding after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: a study of 7- day morbidity after a six, eight and 12-core biopsy protocol. BJU Int 2004; 94(7): 1014-1020.10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05096.xSearch in Google Scholar

8. Raaijmakers R, Kirkels WJ, Roobol MJ. Complication rates and risc factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program. Urology 2002; 60: 826-830.10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01958-1Search in Google Scholar

9. Javorka K jr., Švihra J, Ľupták J, Eliáš B, Kliment J. Hodnotenie kvality života po transrektálnej biopsii prostaty pod ultrazvukovou kontrolou a jej komplikácie. Klinická onkologie 2000; 139: 758-761.Search in Google Scholar

10. Peyromaure M, Ravery V, Messas A, Toublanc M, Boccon-Gibod L. Pain and morbidity of an extensive prostate 10-biopsy protocol: a prospective study in 289 patients. J Urol. 2002; 167(1): 218-221.10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65416-XSearch in Google Scholar

11. Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehir M, McKelvie GB. Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies-true morbidity and patient acceptance. BJ Urol 1993; 71: 460-463.10.1111/j.1464-410X.1993.tb15993.xSearch in Google Scholar

12. Kirkels WJ, Rietbergen JBW, Boeken Kruger AE, Kranse R, Schroder FH. Complication rates and risk factors of ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate in a population based screening program. J Urol 1997; 146: 75-77.Search in Google Scholar

13. Kreutzer N, Wolter S, Haupt G, Engelmann U. Schmerzwahrnehmung und Komplikationen bei der transrektalen Prostatabiopsie. Aktuel Urol 2012; 33: 277-282.10.1055/s-2002-32835Search in Google Scholar

14. Zisman, A., Leibovici, D., Siegel, Y.I., Lindner, A. Complications and Quality of Life Impairment After Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy - A Prospective Study 1999 Selected Abstracts from American Urological Association annual meeting.10.1097/00005392-199904020-00288Search in Google Scholar

15. Pushkar’ Dlu., Govorov A.V. Complications of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Urology 2005; 112(2): 40-42.Search in Google Scholar

16. Paul R, Scholer S, van Randenborgh H. Morbidity of prostatic biopsy for different biopsy strategies: is there a relation to core number and sampling region? Eur Urology 2004; 45: 450-456.Search in Google Scholar

17. Naughton CK. A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: Impact on cancer detection. J Urol 2000; 163: 168-171.10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67996-7Search in Google Scholar

18. Lugg J, Lettieri J, Stass H, Agarwal V. Determination of the concentration of ciprofloxacin in prostate tissue following administration of a single, 1000 mg, extended-release dose. J Chemother 2008; 20: 213-218.10.1179/joc.2008.20.2.21318467248Search in Google Scholar

19. Lindstedt S, Lindstrom U, Ljunggren E, Wullt B, Grabe M. Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in core prostate biopsy: Impact of timing and identification of risk factors. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 832-837.10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.00316750292Search in Google Scholar

20. Tobias-Machado M, Correa TD, De Baros EL, Wroclawski ER. Antibiotic prophylaxis in prostate biopsy. A comperative randomized clinical assay between ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and chloramphenicol. Int Braz J Urol 2003; 29(4): 313-319.10.1590/S1677-55382003000400005Search in Google Scholar

21. Aron M, Rajeen TP, Gupta NP. Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal nedele biopsy of the prostate: a randomized controlled study. BJU Int 2000; 85: 492-494.Search in Google Scholar

22. Larsson P, Norming U, Tornblom M, Gustafsson O. Antibiotic prophylaxis for prostate biopsy: benefits and costs. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 1999; 2: 88-90.10.1038/sj.pcan.450029412496844Search in Google Scholar

23. Schaeffer AJ, Montorsi F, Scattoni V, Perroncel R, Song J, Haverstock DC, Pertel PE. Comparison of a 3-day with a 1-day regimen of an extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin as antimicrobial prophylaxis for patients undergoing transrectal nedele biopsy of the prostate. BJU Int 2007; 100: 51-57.10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06848.x17552953Search in Google Scholar