Role of Thermal Energy Storage Technology in the Decarbonization of Energy Sector Process – Packed Rock Bed Parameters Analysis
, et
28 janv. 2023
À propos de cet article
Publié en ligne: 28 janv. 2023
Pages: 65 - 74
Reçu: 15 mars 2022
Accepté: 24 mai 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/acee-2022-0031
Mots clés
© 2022 Jakub Ochmann et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

The obtained and assumed parameters of the investigated materials in TES installation
Item | Basalt | Granite | Ceramics – alumina | Unit |
---|---|---|---|---|
Density | 2660 | 2400 | 3960 | kg/m3 |
Heat capacity | 870–922 | 810–840 | 766–962 | J/kg · K |
Thermal conductivity | 2.1–2.3 | 1.9–2.1 | 24.5–32.8 | W/m · K |
Max. operating temperature | ~700 | 650 | 1600 | °C |
The studied values of particle diameters and porosity for analyzed samples of materials in TES installation
Item | No. 1 | No. 2 | No. 3 | No. 4 | Unit |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Particle diameter |
24.5 | 20 | 15.5 | 12 | mm |
Porosity |
0.39 | 0.385 | 0.38 | 0.375 | - |
The boundary conditions for the rock deposit in TES installation
Item | Value | Unit |
---|---|---|
Inlet air temperature | 80 | °C |
Inlet air mass flow | 0.04 | kg/s |
Ambient temperature | 20.1 | °C |
Ambient pressure | 101325 | Pa |
Average external heat transfer coefficient | 5 | W/m2K |