This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bird SA, Boyd K. Multiple myeloma: an overview of management. Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2019; 13. doi: 10.1177/117822421986823BirdSABoydKMultiple myeloma: an overview of managementPalliat Care Soc Pract.20191310.1177/117822421986823Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ozaki S, Handa H, Saitoh T, Murakami H, Itagaki M, Asaoku H, et al. Trends of survival in patients with multiple myeloma in Japan: a multicenter retrospective collaborative study of the Japanese Society of Myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2015; 5:e349. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2015.79OzakiSHandaHSaitohTMurakamiHItagakiMAsaokuHTrends of survival in patients with multiple myeloma in Japan: a multicenter retrospective collaborative study of the Japanese Society of MyelomaBlood Cancer J.20155e34910.1038/bcj.2015.79Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lee SJ, Tien HF, Park HJ, Kim JA, Lee DS. Gradual increase of chronic lymphocytic leukemia incidence in Korea, 1999–2010: comparison to plasma cell myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016; 57:585–9.LeeSJTienHFParkHJKimJALeeDSGradual increase of chronic lymphocytic leukemia incidence in Korea, 1999–2010: comparison to plasma cell myelomaLeuk Lymphoma.2016575859Search in Google Scholar
Tang CH, Liu HY, Hou HA, Qiu H, Huang KC, Siggins S, et al. Epidemiology of multiple myeloma in Taiwan, a population based study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018; 55:136–41.TangCHLiuHYHouHAQiuHHuangKCSigginsSEpidemiology of multiple myeloma in Taiwan, a population based studyCancer Epidemiol.20185513641Search in Google Scholar
Durie BG, Salmon SE. A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival. Cancer. 1975; 36:842–54.DurieBGSalmonSEA clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survivalCancer.19753684254Search in Google Scholar
Mogollón P, Díaz-Tejedor A, Algarín EM, Paíno T, Garayoa M, Ocio EM. Biological background of resistance to current standards of care in multiple myeloma. Cells. 2019; 8:1432. doi: 10.3390/cells8111432MogollónPDíaz-TejedorAAlgarínEMPaínoTGarayoaMOcioEMBiological background of resistance to current standards of care in multiple myelomaCells.20198143210.3390/cells8111432Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pan D, Richter J. Where we stand with precision therapeutics in myeloma: prosperity, promises, and pipedreams. Front Oncol. 2022; 11:819127. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.819127PanDRichterJWhere we stand with precision therapeutics in myeloma: prosperity, promises, and pipedreamsFront Oncol.20221181912710.3389/fonc.2021.819127Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Saxe D, Seo EJ, Bergeron MB, Han JY. Recent advances in cytogenetic characterization of multiple myeloma. Int J Lab Hematol. 2019; 41:5–14.SaxeDSeoEJBergeronMBHanJYRecent advances in cytogenetic characterization of multiple myelomaInt J Lab Hematol.201941514Search in Google Scholar
Hu L, Ru K, Zhang L, Huang Y, Zhu X, Liu H, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): an increasingly demanded tool for biomarker research and personalized medicine. Biomark Res. 2014; 2:3. doi: 10.1186/2050-7771-2-3HuLRuKZhangLHuangYZhuXLiuHFluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): an increasingly demanded tool for biomarker research and personalized medicineBiomark Res.20142310.1186/2050-7771-2-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Corre J, Munshi N, Avet-Loiseau H. Genetics of multiple myeloma: another heterogeneity level? Blood. 2015; 125:1870–6.CorreJMunshiNAvet-LoiseauHGenetics of multiple myeloma: another heterogeneity level?Blood.201512518706Search in Google Scholar
Barwick BG, Gupta VA, Vertino PM, Boise LH. Cell of origin and genetic alterations in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Front Immunol. 2019; 10:1121. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01121BarwickBGGuptaVAVertinoPMBoiseLHCell of origin and genetic alterations in the pathogenesis of multiple myelomaFront Immunol.201910112110.3389/fimmu.2019.01121Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Prideaux SM, Conway O’Brien E, Chevassut TJ. The genetic architecture of multiple myeloma. Adv Hematol. 2014; 2014:864058. doi: 10.1155/2014/864058PrideauxSMConway O’BrienEChevassutTJThe genetic architecture of multiple myelomaAdv Hematol.2014201486405810.1155/2014/864058Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Smadja NV, Bastard C, Brigaudeau C, Leroux D, Fruchart C; Groupe Français de Cytogénétique Hématologique. Hypodiploidy is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2001; 98:2229–38.SmadjaNVBastardCBrigaudeauCLerouxDFruchartCGroupe Français de Cytogénétique HématologiqueHypodiploidy is a major prognostic factor in multiple myelomaBlood.200198222938Search in Google Scholar
Fonseca R, Debes-Marun CS, Picken EB, Dewald GW, Bryant SC, Winkler JM, et al. The recurrent IgH translocations are highly associated with nonhyperdiploid variant multiple myeloma. Blood. 2003; 102:2562–7.FonsecaRDebes-MarunCSPickenEBDewaldGWBryantSCWinklerJMThe recurrent IgH translocations are highly associated with nonhyperdiploid variant multiple myelomaBlood.200310225627Search in Google Scholar
Carrasco DR, Tonon G, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Sinha R, Feng B, et al. High-resolution genomic profiles define distinct clinicopathogenetic subgroups of multiple myeloma patients. Cancer Cell. 2006; 9:313–25.CarrascoDRTononGHuangYZhangYSinhaRFengBHigh-resolution genomic profiles define distinct clinicopathogenetic subgroups of multiple myeloma patientsCancer Cell.2006931325Search in Google Scholar
Chng WJ, Santana-Dávila R, Van Wier SA, Ahmann GJ, Jalal SM, Bergsagel PL, et al. Prognostic factors for hyperdiploid-myeloma: effects of chromosome 13 deletions and IgH translocations. Leukemia. 2006; 20:807–13.ChngWJSantana-DávilaRVan WierSAAhmannGJJalalSMBergsagelPLPrognostic factors for hyperdiploid-myeloma: effects of chromosome 13 deletions and IgH translocationsLeukemia.20062080713Search in Google Scholar
Chretien ML, Corre J, Lauwers-Cances V, Magrangeas F, Cleynen A, Yon E, et al. Understanding the role of hyperdiploidy in myeloma prognosis: which trisomies really matter? Blood. 2015; 126:2713–9.ChretienMLCorreJLauwers-CancesVMagrangeasFCleynenAYonEUnderstanding the role of hyperdiploidy in myeloma prognosis: which trisomies really matter?Blood.201512627139Search in Google Scholar
Fonseca R, Barlogie B, Bataille R, Bastard C, Bergsagel PL, Chesi M, et al. Genetics and cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: a workshop report. Cancer Res. 2004; 64:1546–58.FonsecaRBarlogieBBatailleRBastardCBergsagelPLChesiMGenetics and cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: a workshop reportCancer Res.200464154658Search in Google Scholar
Chng WJ, Glebov O, Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM. Genetic events in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2007; 20:571–96.ChngWJGlebovOBergsagelPLKuehlWMGenetic events in the pathogenesis of multiple myelomaBest Pract Res Clin Haematol.20072057196Search in Google Scholar
Tian E, Sawyer JR, Heuck CJ, Zhang Q, van Rhee F, Barlogie B, Epstein J. In multiple myeloma, 14q32 translocations are nonrandom chromosomal fusions driving high expression levels of the respective partner genes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2014; 53:549–57.TianESawyerJRHeuckCJZhangQvan RheeFBarlogieBEpsteinJIn multiple myeloma, 14q32 translocations are nonrandom chromosomal fusions driving high expression levels of the respective partner genesGenes Chromosomes Cancer.20145354957Search in Google Scholar
Mirabella F, Wu P, Wardell CP, Kaiser MF, Walker BA, Johnson DC, Morgan GJ. MMSET is the key molecular target in t(4;14) myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2013; 3:e114. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2013.9MirabellaFWuPWardellCPKaiserMFWalkerBAJohnsonDCMorganGJMMSET is the key molecular target in t(4;14) myelomaBlood Cancer J.20133e11410.1038/bcj.2013.9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kalff A, Spencer A. The t(4;14) translocation and FGFR3 overexpression in multiple myeloma: prognostic implications and current clinical strategies. Blood Cancer J. 2012; 2:e89. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2012.37KalffASpencerAThe t(4;14) translocation and FGFR3 overexpression in multiple myeloma: prognostic implications and current clinical strategiesBlood Cancer J.20122e8910.1038/bcj.2012.37Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Moreau P, Facon T, Leleu X, Morineau N, Huyghe P, Harousseau JL, et al. Recurrent 14q32 translocations determine the prognosis of multiple myeloma, especially in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy. Blood. 2002; 100:1579–83.MoreauPFaconTLeleuXMorineauNHuyghePHarousseauJLRecurrent 14q32 translocations determine the prognosis of multiple myeloma, especially in patients receiving intensive chemotherapyBlood.2002100157983Search in Google Scholar
Sibley K, Fenton JA, Dring AM, Ashcroft AJ, Rawstron AC, Morgan GJ. A molecular study of the t(4;14) in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2002; 118:514–20.SibleyKFentonJADringAMAshcroftAJRawstronACMorganGJA molecular study of the t(4;14) in multiple myelomaBr J Haematol.200211851420Search in Google Scholar
Chan H, Phillips M, Maganti M, Farooki S, Piza Rodriguez G, Masih-Khan E, et al. Single-center experience in treating patients with t(4;14) multiple myeloma with and without planned frontline autologous stem cell transplantation. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018; 18:225–34.ChanHPhillipsMMagantiMFarookiSPiza RodriguezGMasih-KhanESingle-center experience in treating patients with t(4;14) multiple myeloma with and without planned frontline autologous stem cell transplantationClin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk.20181822534Search in Google Scholar
Avet-Loiseau H, Malard F, Campion L, Magrangeas F, Sebban C, Lioure B, et al. Translocation t(14;16) and multiple myeloma: is it really an independent prognostic factor? Blood. 2011; 117:2009–11.Avet-LoiseauHMalardFCampionLMagrangeasFSebbanCLioureBTranslocation t(14;16) and multiple myeloma: is it really an independent prognostic factor?Blood.2011117200911Search in Google Scholar
Attal M, Harousseau JL, Leyvraz S, Doyen C, Hulin C, Benboubker L, et al. Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006; 108:3289–94.AttalMHarousseauJLLeyvrazSDoyenCHulinCBenboubkerLMaintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myelomaBlood.2006108328994Search in Google Scholar
Fonseca R, Bailey RJ, Ahmann GJ, Rajkumar SV, Hoyer JD, Lust JA, et al. Genomic abnormalities in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood. 2002; 100:1417–24.FonsecaRBaileyRJAhmannGJRajkumarSVHoyerJDLustJAGenomic abnormalities in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceBlood.2002100141724Search in Google Scholar
Chang H, Qi XY, Stewart AK. t(11;14) does not predict long-term survival in myeloma. Leukemia. 2005; 19:1078–9.ChangHQiXYStewartAKt(11;14) does not predict long-term survival in myelomaLeukemia.20051910789Search in Google Scholar
Matulis SM, Gupta VA, Neri P, Bahlis NJ, Maciag P, Leverson JD, et al. Functional profiling of venetoclax sensitivity can predict clinical response in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2019; 33:1291–6.MatulisSMGuptaVANeriPBahlisNJMaciagPLeversonJDFunctional profiling of venetoclax sensitivity can predict clinical response in multiple myelomaLeukemia.20193312916Search in Google Scholar
Cardona-Benavides IJ, de Ramón C, Gutiérrez NC. Genetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma: prognostic and therapeutic implications. Cells. 2021; 10:336. doi: 10.3390/cells10020336Cardona-BenavidesIJde RamónCGutiérrezNCGenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma: prognostic and therapeutic implicationsCells.20211033610.3390/cells10020336Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Walker BA, Leone PE, Chiecchio L, Dickens NJ, Jenner MW, Boyd KD, et al. A compendium of myeloma-associated chromosomal copy number abnormalities and their prognostic value. Blood. 2010; 116:e56–65.WalkerBALeonePEChiecchioLDickensNJJennerMWBoydKDA compendium of myeloma-associated chromosomal copy number abnormalities and their prognostic valueBlood.2010116e5665Search in Google Scholar
Varma A, Sui D, Milton DR, Tang G, Saini N, Hasan O, et al. Outcome of multiple myeloma with chromosome 1q gain and 1p deletion after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: propensity score matched analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020; 26:665–71.VarmaASuiDMiltonDRTangGSainiNHasanOOutcome of multiple myeloma with chromosome 1q gain and 1p deletion after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: propensity score matched analysisBiol Blood Marrow Transplant.20202666571Search in Google Scholar
Sonneveld P. Gain of 1q21 in multiple myeloma: from bad to worse? Blood. 2006; 108:1426–7.SonneveldPGain of 1q21 in multiple myeloma: from bad to worse?Blood.200610814267Search in Google Scholar
Rajan AM, Rajkumar SV. Interpretation of cytogenetic results in multiple myeloma for clinical practice. Blood Cancer J. 2015; 5:e365. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2015.92RajanAMRajkumarSVInterpretation of cytogenetic results in multiple myeloma for clinical practiceBlood Cancer J.20155e36510.1038/bcj.2015.92Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
An G, Xu Y, Shi L, Shizhen Z, Deng S, Xie Z, et al. Chromosome 1q21 gains confer inferior outcomes in multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib but copy number variation and percentage of plasma cells involved have no additional prognostic value. Haematologica. 2014; 99:353–9.AnGXuYShiLShizhenZDengSXieZChromosome 1q21 gains confer inferior outcomes in multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib but copy number variation and percentage of plasma cells involved have no additional prognostic valueHaematologica.2014993539Search in Google Scholar
Grzasko N, Hajek R, Hus M, Chocholska S, Morawska M, Giannopoulos K, et al. Chromosome 1 amplification has similar prognostic value to del(17p13) and t(4;14)(p16;q32) in multiple myeloma patients: analysis of real-life data from the Polish Myeloma Study Group. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017; 58:1–15.GrzaskoNHajekRHusMChocholskaSMorawskaMGiannopoulosKChromosome 1 amplification has similar prognostic value to del(17p13) and t(4;14)(p16;q32) in multiple myeloma patients: analysis of real-life data from the Polish Myeloma Study GroupLeuk Lymphoma.201758115Search in Google Scholar
Maura F, Bolli N, Angelopoulos N, Dawson KJ, Leongamornlert D, Martincorena I, et al. Genomic landscape and chronological reconstruction of driver events in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2019; 10:3835. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11680-1MauraFBolliNAngelopoulosNDawsonKJLeongamornlertDMartincorenaIGenomic landscape and chronological reconstruction of driver events in multiple myelomaNat Commun.201910383510.1038/s41467-019-11680-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Walker BA. The chromosome 13 conundrum in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer Discov. 2020; 1:16–7.WalkerBAThe chromosome 13 conundrum in multiple myelomaBlood Cancer Discov.20201167Search in Google Scholar
Binder M, Rajkumar SV, Ketterling RP, Greipp PT, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, et al. Prognostic implications of abnormalities of chromosome 13 and the presence of multiple cytogenetic high-risk abnormalities in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2017; 7:e600. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.83BinderMRajkumarSVKetterlingRPGreippPTDispenzieriALacyMQPrognostic implications of abnormalities of chromosome 13 and the presence of multiple cytogenetic high-risk abnormalities in newly diagnosed multiple myelomaBlood Cancer J.20177e60010.1038/bcj.2017.83Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gozzetti A, Frasconi A, Crupi R. Molecular cytogenetics of multiple myeloma. Austin J Cancer Clin Res. 2014; 1:1020.GozzettiAFrasconiACrupiRMolecular cytogenetics of multiple myelomaAustin J Cancer Clin Res.201411020Search in Google Scholar
Bustoros M, Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R, Park J, Redd R, Zhitomirsky B, Dunford AJ, et al. Genomic profiling of smoldering multiple myeloma identifies patients at a high risk of disease progression. J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38:2380–9.BustorosMSklavenitis-PistofidisRParkJReddRZhitomirskyBDunfordAJGenomic profiling of smoldering multiple myeloma identifies patients at a high risk of disease progressionJ Clin Oncol.20203823809Search in Google Scholar
Jenner MW, Leone PE, Walker BA, Ross FM, Johnson DC, Gonzalez D, et al. Gene mapping and expression analysis of 16q loss of heterozygosity identifies WWOX and CYLD as being important in determining clinical outcome in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2007; 110:3291–300.JennerMWLeonePEWalkerBARossFMJohnsonDCGonzalezDGene mapping and expression analysis of 16q loss of heterozygosity identifies WWOX and CYLD as being important in determining clinical outcome in multiple myelomaBlood.20071103291300Search in Google Scholar
Kim GY, Gabrea A, Demchenko YN, Bergsagel L, Roschke AV, Kuehl WM. Complex IGH rearrangements in multiple myeloma: frequent detection discrepancies among three different probe sets. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2014; 53:467–74.KimGYGabreaADemchenkoYNBergsagelLRoschkeAVKuehlWMComplex IGH rearrangements in multiple myeloma: frequent detection discrepancies among three different probe setsGenes Chromosomes Cancer.20145346774Search in Google Scholar
Mikulasova A, Ashby C, Tytarenko RG, Qu P, Rosenthal A, Dent JA, et al. Microhomology-mediated end joining drives complex rearrangements and overexpression of MYC and PVT1 in multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2020; 105:1055–66.MikulasovaAAshbyCTytarenkoRGQuPRosenthalADentJAMicrohomology-mediated end joining drives complex rearrangements and overexpression of MYC and PVT1 in multiple myelomaHaematologica.2020105105566Search in Google Scholar
Moreau P, Chanan-Khan A, Roberts AW, Agarwal AB, Facon T, Kumar S, et al. Promising efficacy and acceptable safety of venetoclax plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory MM. Blood. 2017; 130:2392–400.MoreauPChanan-KhanARobertsAWAgarwalABFaconTKumarSPromising efficacy and acceptable safety of venetoclax plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory MMBlood.20171302392400Search in Google Scholar
Tomas P, Miroslava V, Jiri M, Jana B, Jaroslav B, Marie J, Vlastimil S. Translocation t(8;14) in multiple myeloma defines patients with very poor prognosis – Single centre experience. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015; 15(Suppl 3):e122. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.07.311TomasPMiroslavaVJiriMJanaBJaroslavBMarieJVlastimilSTranslocation t(8;14) in multiple myeloma defines patients with very poor prognosis – Single centre experienceClin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk.201515Suppl 3e12210.1016/j.clml.2015.07.311Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Misund K, Keane N, Stein CK, Asmann YW, Day G, Welsh S, et al. MYC dysregulation in the progression of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2020; 34:322–6.MisundKKeaneNSteinCKAsmannYWDayGWelshSMYC dysregulation in the progression of multiple myelomaLeukemia.2020343226Search in Google Scholar
Gmidène A, Saad A, Avet-Loiseau H. 8p21.3 deletion suggesting a probable role of TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 as candidate tumor suppressor genes in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Med Oncol. 2013; 30:489. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0489-8GmidèneASaadAAvet-LoiseauH8p21.3 deletion suggesting a probable role of TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 as candidate tumor suppressor genes in the pathogenesis of multiple myelomaMed Oncol.20133048910.1007/s12032-013-0489-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gazitt Y. TRAIL is a potent inducer of apoptosis in myeloma cells derived from multiple myeloma patients and is not cytotoxic to hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia. 1999; 13:1817–24.GazittYTRAIL is a potent inducer of apoptosis in myeloma cells derived from multiple myeloma patients and is not cytotoxic to hematopoietic stem cellsLeukemia.199913181724Search in Google Scholar
Baysal M, Demirci U, Umit E, Kirkizlar HO, Atli EI, Gurkan H, et al. Concepts of double hit and triple hit disease in multiple myeloma, entity and prognostic significance. Sci Rep. 2020; 10:5991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62885-0BaysalMDemirciUUmitEKirkizlarHOAtliEIGurkanHConcepts of double hit and triple hit disease in multiple myeloma, entity and prognostic significanceSci Rep.202010599110.1038/s41598-020-62885-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bolli N, Biancon G, Moarii M, Gimondi S, Li Y, de Philippis C, et al. Analysis of the genomic landscape of multiple myeloma highlights novel prognostic markers and disease subgroups. Leukemia. 2018; 32:2604–16.BolliNBianconGMoariiMGimondiSLiYde PhilippisCAnalysis of the genomic landscape of multiple myeloma highlights novel prognostic markers and disease subgroupsLeukemia.201832260416Search in Google Scholar
Walker BA, Mavrommatis K, Wardell CP, Ashby TC, Bauer M, Davies F, et al. A high-risk, double-hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis. Leukemia. 2019; 33:159–70.WalkerBAMavrommatisKWardellCPAshbyTCBauerMDaviesFA high-risk, double-hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysisLeukemia.20193315970Search in Google Scholar
Zhan F, Hardin J, Kordsmeier B, Bumm K, Zheng M, Tian E, et al. Global gene expression profiling of multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and normal bone marrow plasma cells. Blood. 2002; 99:1745–57.ZhanFHardinJKordsmeierBBummKZhengMTianEGlobal gene expression profiling of multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and normal bone marrow plasma cellsBlood.200299174557Search in Google Scholar
Shaughnessy JD Jr, Zhan F, Burington BE, Huang Y, Colla S, Hanamura I, et al. A validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1. Blood. 2007; 109:2276–84.ShaughnessyJDJrZhanFBuringtonBEHuangYCollaSHanamuraIA validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1Blood.2007109227684Search in Google Scholar
Broyl A, Hose D, Lokhorst H, de Knegt Y, Peeters J, Jauch A, et al. Gene expression profiling for molecular classification of multiple myeloma in newly diagnosed patients. Blood. 2010; 116:2543–53.BroylAHoseDLokhorstHde KnegtYPeetersJJauchAGene expression profiling for molecular classification of multiple myeloma in newly diagnosed patientsBlood.2010116254353Search in Google Scholar
Zhan F, Huang Y, Colla S, Stewart JP, Hanamura I, Gupta S, et al. The molecular classification of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006; 108:2020–8.ZhanFHuangYCollaSStewartJPHanamuraIGuptaSThe molecular classification of multiple myelomaBlood.200610820208Search in Google Scholar
Kuiper R, Broyl A, de Knegt Y, van Vliet MH, van Beers EH, van der Holt B, et al. A gene expression signature for high-risk multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2012; 26:2406–13.KuiperRBroylAde KnegtYvan VlietMHvan BeersEHvan der HoltBA gene expression signature for high-risk multiple myelomaLeukemia.201226240613Search in Google Scholar
Kuiper R, van Duin M, van Vliet MH, Broijl A, van der Holt B, El Jarari L, et al. Prediction of high- and low-risk multiple myeloma based on gene expression and the International Staging System. Blood. 2015; 126:1996–2004.KuiperRvan DuinMvan VlietMHBroijlAvan der HoltBEl JarariLPrediction of high- and low-risk multiple myeloma based on gene expression and the International Staging SystemBlood.201512619962004Search in Google Scholar
Chapman MA, Lawrence MS, Keats JJ, Cibulskis K, Sougnez C, Schinzel AC, et al. Initial genome sequencing and analysis of multiple myeloma. Nature. 2011; 471:467–72.ChapmanMALawrenceMSKeatsJJCibulskisKSougnezCSchinzelACInitial genome sequencing and analysis of multiple myelomaNature.201147146772Search in Google Scholar
Corre J, Cleynen A, Robiou du Pont S, Buisson L, Bolli N, Attal M, et al. Multiple myeloma clonal evolution in homogeneously treated patients. Leukemia. 2018; 32:2636–47.CorreJCleynenARobiou du PontSBuissonLBolliNAttalMMultiple myeloma clonal evolution in homogeneously treated patientsLeukemia.201832263647Search in Google Scholar
Perrot A, Corre J, Avet-Loiseau H. Risk stratification and targets in multiple myeloma: from genomics to the bedside. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018; 38:675–80.PerrotACorreJAvet-LoiseauHRisk stratification and targets in multiple myeloma: from genomics to the bedsideAm Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book.20183867580Search in Google Scholar
Hu Y, Chen W, Wang J. Progress in the identification of gene mutations involved in multiple myeloma. Onco Targets Ther. 2019; 12:4075–80.HuYChenWWangJProgress in the identification of gene mutations involved in multiple myelomaOnco Targets Ther.201912407580Search in Google Scholar
Walker BA, Boyle EM, Wardell CP, Murison A, Begum DB, Dahir NM, et al. Mutational spectrum, copy number changes, and outcome: results of a sequencing study of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33:3911–20.WalkerBABoyleEMWardellCPMurisonABegumDBDahirNMMutational spectrum, copy number changes, and outcome: results of a sequencing study of patients with newly diagnosed myelomaJ Clin Oncol.201533391120Search in Google Scholar
Mulligan G, Lichter DI, Di Bacco A, Blakemore SJ, Berger A, Koenig E, et al. Mutation of NRAS but not KRAS significantly reduces myeloma sensitivity to single-agent bortezomib therapy. Blood. 2014; 123:632–9.MulliganGLichterDIDi BaccoABlakemoreSJBergerAKoenigEMutation of NRAS but not KRAS significantly reduces myeloma sensitivity to single-agent bortezomib therapyBlood.20141236329Search in Google Scholar
Walker BA, Mavrommatis K, Wardell CP, Ashby TC, Bauer M, Davies FE, et al. Identification of novel mutational drivers reveals oncogene dependencies in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018; 132:587–97.WalkerBAMavrommatisKWardellCPAshbyTCBauerMDaviesFEIdentification of novel mutational drivers reveals oncogene dependencies in multiple myelomaBlood.201813258797Search in Google Scholar
Bolli N, Avet-Loiseau H, Wedge DC, Van Loo P, Alexandrov LB, Martincorena I, et al. Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:2997. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3997BolliNAvet-LoiseauHWedgeDCVan LooPAlexandrovLBMartincorenaIHeterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myelomaNat Commun.20145299710.1038/ncomms3997Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lohr JG, Stojanov P, Carter SL, Cruz-Gordillo P, Lawrence MS, Auclair D, et al. Widespread genetic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma: implications for targeted therapy. Cancer Cell. 2014; 25:91–101.LohrJGStojanovPCarterSLCruz-GordilloPLawrenceMSAuclairDWidespread genetic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma: implications for targeted therapyCancer Cell.20142591101Search in Google Scholar
Lionetti M, Barbieri M, Todoerti K, Agnelli L, Marzorati S, Fabris S, et al. Molecular spectrum of BRAF, NRAS and KRAS gene mutations in plasma cell dyscrasias: implication for MEK-ERK pathway activation. Oncotarget. 2015; 6:24205–17.LionettiMBarbieriMTodoertiKAgnelliLMarzoratiSFabrisSMolecular spectrum of BRAF, NRAS and KRAS gene mutations in plasma cell dyscrasias: implication for MEK-ERK pathway activationOncotarget.201562420517Search in Google Scholar
Davis A, Gao R, Navin N. Tumor evolution: linear, branching, neutral or punctuated? Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2017; 1867:151–61.DavisAGaoRNavinNTumor evolution: linear, branching, neutral or punctuated?Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer.2017186715161Search in Google Scholar
Rasche L, Schinke C, Maura F, Bauer MA, Ashby C, Deshpande S, et al. The spatio-temporal evolution of multiple myeloma from baseline to relapse-refractory states. Nat Commun. 2022; 13:4517. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32145-yRascheLSchinkeCMauraFBauerMAAshbyCDeshpandeSThe spatio-temporal evolution of multiple myeloma from baseline to relapse-refractory statesNat Commun.202213451710.1038/s41467-022-32145-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM. Promiscuous structural variants drive myeloma initiation and progression. Blood Cancer Discov. 2020; 1:221–3.BergsagelPLKuehlWMPromiscuous structural variants drive myeloma initiation and progressionBlood Cancer Discov.202012213Search in Google Scholar
Stephens PJ, Greenman CD, Fu B, Yang F, Bignell GR, Mudie LJ, et al. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell. 2011; 144:27–40.StephensPJGreenmanCDFuBYangFBignellGRMudieLJMassive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer developmentCell.20111442740Search in Google Scholar
Shen MM. Chromoplexy: a new category of complex rearrangements in the cancer genome. Cancer Cell. 2013; 23:567–9.ShenMMChromoplexy: a new category of complex rearrangements in the cancer genomeCancer Cell.2013235679Search in Google Scholar
Ashby C, Boyle EM, Bauer MA, Mikulasova A, Wardell CP, Williams L, et al. Structural variants shape the genomic landscape and clinical outcome of multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2022; 12:85. doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00673-xAshbyCBoyleEMBauerMAMikulasovaAWardellCPWilliamsLStructural variants shape the genomic landscape and clinical outcome of multiple myelomaBlood Cancer J.2022128510.1038/s41408-022-00673-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wiedmeier-Nutor JE, Bergsagel PL. Review of multiple myeloma genetics including effects on prognosis, response to treatment, and diagnostic workup. Life (Basel). 2022; 12:812. doi: 10.3390/life12060812Wiedmeier-NutorJEBergsagelPLReview of multiple myeloma genetics including effects on prognosis, response to treatment, and diagnostic workupLife (Basel).20221281210.3390/life12060812Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rustad EH, Yellapantula VD, Glodzik D, Maclachlan KH, Diamond B, Boyle EM, et al. Revealing the impact of structural variants in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer Discov. 2020; 1:258–73.RustadEHYellapantulaVDGlodzikDMaclachlanKHDiamondBBoyleEMRevealing the impact of structural variants in multiple myelomaBlood Cancer Discov.2020125873Search in Google Scholar
Tang C, Bagnara D, Chiorazzi N, Scharff MD, MacCarthy T. AID overlapping and polη hotspots are key features of evolutionary variation within the human antibody heavy chain (IGHV) genes. Front Immunol. 2020; 11:788. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00788TangCBagnaraDChiorazziNScharffMDMacCarthyTAID overlapping and polη hotspots are key features of evolutionary variation within the human antibody heavy chain (IGHV) genesFront Immunol.20201178810.3389/fimmu.2020.00788Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kotani A, Kakazu N, Tsuruyama T, Okazaki IM, Muramatsu M, Kinoshita K, et al. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) promotes B cell lymphomagenesis in Emu-cmyc transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104:1616–20.KotaniAKakazuNTsuruyamaTOkazakiIMMuramatsuMKinoshitaKActivation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) promotes B cell lymphomagenesis in Emu-cmyc transgenic miceProc Natl Acad Sci U S A.2007104161620Search in Google Scholar
Maura F, Rustad EH, Yellapantula V, Łuksza M, Hoyos D, Maclachlan KH, et al. Role of AID in the temporal pattern of acquisition of driver mutations in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2020; 34:1476–80.MauraFRustadEHYellapantulaVŁukszaMHoyosDMaclachlanKHRole of AID in the temporal pattern of acquisition of driver mutations in multiple myelomaLeukemia.202034147680Search in Google Scholar
Talluri S, Samur MK, Buon L, Kumar S, Potluri LB, Shi J, et al. Dysregulated APOBEC3G causes DNA damage and promotes genomic instability in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2021; 11:166. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00554-9TalluriSSamurMKBuonLKumarSPotluriLBShiJDysregulated APOBEC3G causes DNA damage and promotes genomic instability in multiple myelomaBlood Cancer J.20211116610.1038/s41408-021-00554-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Walker BA, Wardell CP, Murison A, Boyle EM, Begum DB, Dahir NM, et al. APOBEC family mutational signatures are associated with poor prognosis translocations in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:6997. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7997WalkerBAWardellCPMurisonABoyleEMBegumDBDahirNMAPOBEC family mutational signatures are associated with poor prognosis translocations in multiple myelomaNat Commun.20156699710.1038/ncomms7997Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maura F, Petljak M, Lionetti M, Cifola I, Liang W, Pinatel E, et al. Biological and prognostic impact of APOBEC-induced mutations in the spectrum of plasma cell dyscrasias and multiple myeloma cell lines. Leukemia. 2018; 32:1044–8.MauraFPetljakMLionettiMCifolaILiangWPinatelEBiological and prognostic impact of APOBEC-induced mutations in the spectrum of plasma cell dyscrasias and multiple myeloma cell linesLeukemia.20183210448Search in Google Scholar
Yamazaki H, Shirakawa K, Matsumoto T, Hirabayashi S, Murakawa Y, Kobayashi M, et al. Endogenous APOBEC3B overexpression constitutively generates DNA substitutions and deletions in myeloma cells. Sci Rep. 2019; 9:7122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43575-yYamazakiHShirakawaKMatsumotoTHirabayashiSMurakawaYKobayashiMEndogenous APOBEC3B overexpression constitutively generates DNA substitutions and deletions in myeloma cellsSci Rep.20199712210.1038/s41598-019-43575-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mateos MV, Kumar S, Dimopoulos MA, González-Calle V, Kastritis E, Hajek R, et al. International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Blood Cancer J. 2020; 10:102. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00366-3MateosMVKumarSDimopoulosMAGonzález-CalleVKastritisEHajekRInternational Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM)Blood Cancer J.20201010210.1038/s41408-020-00366-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Oben B, Froyen G, Maclachlan KH, Leongamornlert D, Abascal F, Zheng-Lin B, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals progressive versus stable myeloma precursor conditions as two distinct entities. Nat Commun. 2021; 12:1861. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22140-0ObenBFroyenGMaclachlanKHLeongamornlertDAbascalFZheng-LinBWhole-genome sequencing reveals progressive versus stable myeloma precursor conditions as two distinct entitiesNat Commun.202112186110.1038/s41467-021-22140-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar