[
1. Browning W.D. et al. (2014), 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design, Terrapin Bright Green, LLC: New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Browning W.D., Ryan C. (2020), Nature Inside, a Biophilic Design Guide, Royal Institute of British Architects: London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Celadyn M. (2018), Environmental activation of inner space components in sustainable interior design, „Sustainability”, Vol. 10(6), DOI: 10.3390/su10061945.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Celadyn W. (2014), Durability of buildings and sustainable architecture, „Technical Transactions. Architecture”, Vol. 7A, p. 17–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Chapman J. (2009), Design for (Emotional) Durability, „Design Issues”, Vol. 25(4), p. 29–35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Chapman J. (2015), Emotionally Durable Design. Objects, Experiences & Empathy, 2nd ed., Routledge, London–New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Cooper T. (ed.), (2016), Longer Lasting Products. Alternative to the Throwaway Society, Routledge, London–New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Haines-Gadd M. et al. (2018), Emotional Durability Design Nine – A Tool for Product Longevity, „Sustainability”, Vol. 10, DOI:10.3390/su10061948.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Heerwagen J.H., Hase B. (2001), Building biophilia: Connecting people to nature, „Environmental Design and Construction”, Vol. 4, p. 30–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Kellert S.R. (2005), Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature connection, Island Press, Washington.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Kellert S.R. et al. (eds.), (2008), Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Ko K. et al. (2011), Long-Term Product Attachment: A Sustainable Design Approach for Optimising the Relationship Between Users and Products, in: Proceedings of the Tao of Sustainability, International Conference on Sustainable Design Strategies in a Globalization Context, Beijing, China, 27–29 October 2011; p. 580–587.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Mugge R. et al. (2006), Product Attachment and Product Lifetime: The Role of Personality Congruity and Fashion, „European Advances in Consumer Research”, Vol. 7, p. 460–466.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Mugge R. et al. (2009), Emotional bonding with personalised products, „Journal of Engineering Design”, Vol. 20, No. 5, p. 467–476.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Norman D.A. (2004), Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Page T. (2014), Product attachment and replacement: implications for sustainability design, „International Journal of Sustainable Design”, Vol. 2, No. 3(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Salingaros N.A, Masden K.G. (2008), Neuro-science, the Natural Environment, and Building Design, in: Biophilic design: the theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life, eds. S.R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, M. Mador, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Stone S. (2019), Undoing Buildings. Adaptive Reuse and Cultural Memory, Routledge, New York–London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Stone S. (2023), Notes towards a Definition of Adaptive Reuse, „Architecture”, Vol. 3(3), p. 477–489.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Świątek L. (2009), “Evergreen”. Durability in Architecture, „Czasopismo Techniczne. Architektura”, Vol. 106, iss. 1-A, p. 533–539.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Walker S. (2006), Sustainable by design. Explorations in Theory and Practice, Earthscan from Routledge, New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Walker S. (2010), Temporal Objects – Design, Change and Sustainability, „Sustainability”, Vol. 2, p. 812–832.
]Search in Google Scholar
Profil Orcid