This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Al Dahouk S, Nöckler K. Implications of laboratory diagnosis on brucellosis therapy. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011;9(7):833–845. doi:10.1586/eri.11.55Al DahoukSNöcklerK.Implications of laboratory diagnosis on brucellosis therapy20119(7):833–845. doi:10.1586/eri.11.55Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Aranís JC, Oporto CJ, Espinoza M, Riedel KI, Pérez CC, García CP. [Usefulness of the determination of IgG and IgM antibodies by ELISA and immunocapture in a clinical series of human brucellosis] (in Spanish). Rev Chilena Infectol. 2008;25(2):116–121. doi:10.4067/S0716-10182008000200006AranísJCOportoCJEspinozaMRiedelKIPérezCCGarcíaCP.[Usefulness of the determination of IgG and IgM antibodies by ELISA and immunocapture in a clinical series of human brucellosis] (in Spanish)200825(2):116–121. doi:10.4067/S0716-10182008000200006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Asaad AM, Alqahtani JM. Serological and molecular diagnosis of human brucellosis in Najran, Southwestern Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2012;5(2):189–194. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2012.02.001 MedlineAsaadAMAlqahtaniJM.Serological and molecular diagnosis of human brucellosis in Najran, Southwestern Saudi Arabia20125(2):189–194. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2012.02.001MedlineOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Binnicker MJ, Theel ES, Larsen SM, Patel R. A high percentage of serum samples that test reactive by enzyme immunoassay for anti-Brucella antibodies are not confirmed by the standard tube agglutination test. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19(8):1332–1334. doi:10.1128/CVI.00197-12 MedlineBinnickerMJTheelESLarsenSMPatelR.A high percentage of serum samples that test reactive by enzyme immunoassay for anti-Brucella antibodies are not confirmed by the standard tube agglutination test201219(8):1332–1334. doi:10.1128/CVI.00197-12MedlineOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Corbel MJ. Recent advances in the study of Brucella antigens and their serological cross-reactions. Vet Bull. 1985;55:927–942.CorbelMJ.Recent advances in the study of Brucella antigens and their serological cross-reactions198555927–942Search in Google Scholar
Fadeel MA, Hoffmaster AR, Shi J, Pimentel G, Stoddard RA. Comparison of four commercial IgM and IgG ELISA kits for diagnosing brucellosis. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60(12):1767–1773. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.033381-0 MedlineFadeelMAHoffmasterARShiJPimentelGStoddardRA.Comparison of four commercial IgM and IgG ELISA kits for diagnosing brucellosis201160(12):1767–1773. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.033381-0MedlineOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Geresu MA, Kassa GM. A Review on diagnostic methods of brucellosis. J. Veterinar. Sci. Techno. 2016;7(1):323.GeresuMAKassaGM.A Review on diagnostic methods of brucellosis20167(1):323Search in Google Scholar
Gómez MC, Nieto JA, Rosa C, Geijo P, Escribano MA, Muñoz A, López C. Evaluation of seven tests for diagnosis of human brucellosis in an area where the disease is endemic. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15(6):1031–1033. doi:10.1128/CVI.00424-07 MedlineGómezMCNietoJARosaCGeijoPEscribanoMAMuñozALópezC.Evaluation of seven tests for diagnosis of human brucellosis in an area where the disease is endemic200815(6):1031–1033. doi:10.1128/CVI.00424-07MedlineOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
ISCII. Spanish national records of notifiable diseases [Internet]. (in Spanish). 2018. Madrid (Spain): Carlos III Health Institute; [cited 2018 Aug 27]. Available from http://www.isciii.es/ISCIII/es/contenidos/fd-servicios-cientifico-tecnicos/fd-vigilancias-alertas/fd-enfermedades/enfermedades-declaracion-obligatoria-series-temporales.shtmlISCII2018Madrid (Spain)Carlos III Health Institute[cited 2018 Aug 27]. Available from http://www.isciii.es/ISCIII/es/contenidos/fd-servicios-cientifico-tecnicos/fd-vigilancias-alertas/fd-enfermedades/enfermedades-declaracion-obligatoria-series-temporales.shtmlSearch in Google Scholar
Mantecón MÁ, Gutiérrez P, Zarzosa MP, Dueñas AI, Solera J, Fernández-Lago L, Vizcaíno N, Almaraz A, Bratos MA, Torres AR, et al. Utility of an immunocapture-agglutination test and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test against cytosolic proteins from Brucella melitensis B115 in the diagnosis and followup of human acute brucellosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;55(1):27–35. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.11.003 MedlineMantecónMÁGutiérrezPZarzosaMPDueñasAISoleraJFernández-LagoLVizcaínoNAlmarazABratosMATorresARUtility of an immunocapture-agglutination test and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test against cytosolic proteins from Brucella melitensis B115 in the diagnosis and followup of human acute brucellosis200655(1):27–35. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.11.003MedlineOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mantur B, Parande A, Amarnath S, Patil G, Walvekar R, Desai A, Parande M, Shinde R, Chandrashekar M, Patil S. ELISA versus conventional methods of diagnosing endemic brucellosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83(2):314–318. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0790 MedlineManturBParandeAAmarnathSPatilGWalvekarRDesaiAParandeMShindeRChandrashekarMPatilS.ELISA versus conventional methods of diagnosing endemic brucellosis201083(2):314–318. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0790MedlineOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Özdemir M, Feyzioğlu B, Kurtoğlu MG, Doğan M, Dağı HT, Yüksekkaya Ş, Keşli R, Baysal B. A comparison of immuncapture agglutination and ELISA methods in serological diagnosis of brucellosis. Int J Med Sci. 2011;8(5):428–432. doi:10.7150/ijms.8.428 MedlineÖzdemirMFeyzioğluBKurtoğluMGDoğanMDağıHTYüksekkayaŞKeşliRBaysalB.A comparison of immuncapture agglutination and ELISA methods in serological diagnosis of brucellosis20118(5):428–432. doi:10.7150/ijms.8.428MedlineOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, Christou L, Tsianos EV. The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6(2):91–99. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70382-6 MedlinePappasGPapadimitriouPAkritidisNChristouLTsianosEV.The new global map of human brucellosis20066(2):91–99. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70382-6MedlineOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Poester FP, Nielsen K, Ernesto Samartino L, Ling Yu W. Diagnosis of Brucellosis. The Open Vet Sci J. 2010;4(1):46–60. doi:10.2174/1874318801004010046PoesterFPNielsenKErnesto SamartinoLLingYu W.Diagnosis of Brucellosis20104(1):46–60. doi:10.2174/1874318801004010046Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sharma R, Chisnall C, Cooke RPD. Evaluation of in-house and commercial immunoassays for the sero-diagnosis of brucellosis in a non-endemic low prevalence population. J Infect. 2008;56(2):108–113. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2007.10.010 MedlineSharmaRChisnallCCookeRPD.Evaluation of in-house and commercial immunoassays for the sero-diagnosis of brucellosis in a non-endemic low prevalence population200856(2):108–113. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2007.10.010Medline18096236Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Varshochi M, Majidi J, Amini M, Ghabili K, Shoja MM. False positive seroreactivity to brucellosis in tuberculosis patients: a prevalence study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:207–210. MedlineVarshochiMMajidiJAminiMGhabiliKShojaMM.False positive seroreactivity to brucellosis in tuberculosis patients: a prevalence study20114207–210Medline10.2147/IJGM.S15120306887421475625Search in Google Scholar
Welch RJ, Litwin CM. A comparison of Brucella IgG and IgM ELISA assays with agglutination methodology. J Clin Lab Anal. 2010;24(3):160–162. doi:10.1002/jcla.20382 MedlineWelchRJLitwinCM.A comparison of Brucella IgG and IgM ELISA assays with agglutination methodology201024(3):160–162. doi:10.1002/jcla.20382Medline664769820486196Open DOISearch in Google Scholar