This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Barnett, G. A., & Benefield, G. A. (2017). Predicting international Facebook ties through cultural homophily and other factors. New Media & Society, 19, 217–239. 10.1177/1461444815604421BarnettG. A.BenefieldG. A.(2017)Predicting international Facebook ties through cultural homophily and other factors1921723910.1177/1461444815604421Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Carley, K. M., & Krackhardt, D. (2006). On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Social Networks, 28, 124–136. 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.05.001BorgattiS. P.CarleyK. M.KrackhardtD.(2006)On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data2812413610.1016/j.socnet.2005.05.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.BorgattiS. P., Everett, M., & FreemanL. C.(2002)Harvard, MAAnalytic TechnologiesSearch in Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.JohnsonJ. C.(2013)Thousand Oaks, CASageSearch in Google Scholar
Boster, F. J., Carpenter, C. J., Andrews, K. R., & Mongeau, P. A. (2012). Employing interpersonal influence to promote behavioral change. Health Communication, 27, 399–407. 10.1080/10410236.2011.595771BosterF. J.CarpenterC. J.AndrewsK. R.MongeauP. A.(2012)Employing interpersonal influence to promote behavioral change2739940710.1080/10410236.2011.595771Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boster, F. J., Kotowski, M. R., Andrews, K. R., & Serota, K. (2011). Identifying influence: Development and validation of the connectivity, persuasiveness, and maven scales. Journal of Communication, 61, 178–197. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01531.xBosterF. J.KotowskiM. R.AndrewsK. R.SerotaK.(2011)Identifying influence: Development and validation of the connectivity, persuasiveness, and maven scales6117819710.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01531.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brass, D. J., & Krackhardt, D. M. (2012). Power, politics, and social networks in organizations. In G. R. Ferris & D. C. Treadway (Eds.), Politics in organizations: Theory and research considerations (pp. 355–375). New York, NY: Taylor & Francsis.BrassD. J.KrackhardtD. M.(2012)Power, politics, and social networks in organizationsInFerrisG. R. & TreadwayD. C.(Eds.),(pp.355375).New York, NYTaylor & FrancsisSearch in Google Scholar
Brewer, D. D., & Webster, C. M. (1999). Forgetting of friends and its effects on measuring friendship networks. Social Networks, 2, 361–373. 10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00018-0BrewerD. D.WebsterC. M.(1999)Forgetting of friends and its effects on measuring friendship networks236137310.1016/S0378-8733(99)00018-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.BurtR. S.(1992)Cambridge, MAHarvard University Press10.4159/9780674029095Search in Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 37–54. 10.1177/0002716299566001004BurtR. S.(1999)The social capital of opinion leaders566375410.1177/0002716299566001004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. The American Journal of Sociology, 110, 349–399. 10.1086/421787BurtR. S.(2004)Structural holes and good ideas11034939910.1086/421787Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., & Ronchi, D. (2007). Teaching executives to see social capital: Results from a field experiment. Social Science Research, 36, 1156–1183. 10.1016/j.ssresearch. 2006.09.005BurtR. S.RonchiD.(2007)Teaching executives to see social capital: Results from a field experiment361156118310.1016/j.ssresearch. 2006.09.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Carpenter, C. J., Boster, F. J., Kotowski, M. R., & Day, J. (2015). Evidence for the validity of a social connectedness scale: Connectors amass bridging social capital online and offline. Communication Quarterly, 63, 119–134. 10.1080/01463373.2015.1012217CarpenterC. J.BosterF. J.KotowskiM. R.DayJ.(2015)Evidence for the validity of a social connectedness scale: Connectors amass bridging social capital online and offline6311913410.1080/01463373.2015.1012217Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dearing, J. W. (2004). Improving the state of health programming by using diffusion theory. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 21–36. 10810730490271502DearingJ. W.(2004)Improving the state of health programming by using diffusion theory9213610810730490271502Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New media & Society, 13, 837–892. 10.1177/1461444810385389EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC.(2011)Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices1383789210.1177/1461444810385389Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fang, R., Chi, L., Chen, M., & Baron, R. A. (2015). Bringing political skill into social netoworks: Findings from a field study of entrepreneurs. Journal of Management Studies, 52, 175–212. 10.1111/joms.12107FangR.ChiL.ChenM.BaronR. A.(2015)Bringing political skill into social netoworks: Findings from a field study of entrepreneurs5217521210.1111/joms.12107Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fang, R., Landis, B., Zhang, Z., Anderson, M. H., Shaw, J. D., & Kilduff, M. (2015). Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organization Science, 26, 1243–1260. 10.1287/orsc.2015.0972FangR.LandisB.ZhangZ.AndersonM. H.ShawJ. D.KilduffM.(2015)Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations261243126010.1287/orsc.2015.0972Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. W. (1950). The spatial ecology of group formation. In L. Festinger, S. Schachter, & K. W. Back (Eds.), Social Pressure in Informal Groups (pp. 141–161). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.FestingerL.SchachterS.BackK. W.(1950)The spatial ecology of group formationInFestingerL.SchachterS.BackK. W.(Eds.),(pp.141161).Palo Alto, CAStanford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Fink, E. L., High, A., & Smith, R. A. (2014). Compliance dynamics within a friendship network II: Structural positions used to garner social support. Human Communication Research, 41, 21–54. 10.1111/hcre.12038FinkE. L.HighA.SmithR. A.(2014)Compliance dynamics within a friendship network II: Structural positions used to garner social support41215410.1111/hcre.12038Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (1978/1979). Centrality in networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7FreemanL. C.(1978/1979)Centrality in networks: Conceptual clarification121523910.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.FrenchJ. R. P.RavenB.(1959)The bases of social powerInCartwrightD.(Ed.),(pp.150167).Ann Arbor, MIUniversity of Michigan Institute for Social ResearchSearch in Google Scholar
Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.HoxJ.(2010)Mahwah, NJErlbaum10.4324/9780203852279Search in Google Scholar
Huang, W., Hong, S. H., & Eades, P. (2005). Layout effects on sociogram perception. Proceedings of Graph Drawing, 3843, 262–273. 10.1007/11618058_24Huang, W., HongS. H.EadesP.(2005)Layout effects on sociogram perception384326227310.1007/11618058_24Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Huisman, M., & Snijders, T. A. (2003). Statistical analysis of longitudinal network data with changing composition. Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 253–287. 10.1177/0049124103256096Huisman, M., & SnijdersT. A.(2003)Statistical analysis of longitudinal network data with changing composition3225328710.1177/0049124103256096Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Katz, E. & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal Influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New York, NY: The Free Press.KatzE. & LazarsfeldP. F.(1955)New York, NYThe Free Press10.4324/9781315126234Search in Google Scholar
Keller, E., & Berry, J. (2003). The Influentials. New York, NY: The Free Press.KellerE.BerryJ.(2003)New York, NYThe Free PressSearch in Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., Lim, B. C., Saltz, J. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 952–963. 10.2307/20159634KleinK. J.LimB. C.SaltzJ. L.MayerD. M.(2004)How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks4795296310.2307/20159634Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kossinets, G., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science, 311, 88–90. 10.1126/science.1116869KossinetsG.WattsD. J.(2006)Empirical analysis of an evolving social network311889010.1126/science.1116869Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, Cognition, and Power in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 342–369.KrackhardtD.(1990)Assessing the political landscape: Structure, Cognition, and Power in Organizations3534236910.2307/2393394Search in Google Scholar
Lazer, D., Rubineau, B., Chetkovich, C., Katz, N., & Neblo, M. (2010). The coevolution of networks and political attitudes. Political Communication, 27, 248–274. 10.1080/10584609.2010.500187LazerD.RubineauB.ChetkovichC.KatzN.NebloM.(2010)The coevolution of networks and political attitudes2724827410.1080/10584609.2010.500187Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lospinoso, J. A., Schweinberger, M., Snijders, T. A. B., and Ripley, R. M. (2011). Assessing and accounting for time heterogeneity in stochastic actor oriented models. Advances in Data Analysis and Computation, 5, 147–176. 10.1007/s11634-010-0076-1LospinosoJ. A.SchweinbergerM.SnijdersT. A. B., and RipleyR. M.(2011)Assessing and accounting for time heterogeneity in stochastic actor oriented models514717610.1007/s11634-010-0076-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mayer, A., & Puller, S. L. (2008). The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 329–347. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.09.001MayerA.PullerS. L.(2008)The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses9232934710.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.09.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
McEwan, B., & Guerrero, L. K. (2012). Maintenance behavior and relationship quality as predictors of perceived availability of resources in newly formed college friendship networks. Communication Studies, 63, 421–440. 10.1080/10510974.2011.639433McEwanB.GuerreroL. K.(2012)Maintenance behavior and relationship quality as predictors of perceived availability of resources in newly formed college friendship networks6342144010.1080/10510974.2011.639433Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Meng, J. (2016). Your health buddies matter: Preferential selection and social influence on weight management in an online health social network. Health Communication, 31, 1460–1471. 10.1080/10410236.2015.1079760MengJ.(2016)Your health buddies matter: Preferential selection and social influence on weight management in an online health social network311460147110.1080/10410236.2015.1079760Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.MongeP. R.ContractorN. S.(2003)Oxford, UKOxford University Press10.1093/oso/9780195160369.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.NewcombT. M.(1961)New York, NYHolt, Rinehart, & Winston10.1037/13156-000Search in Google Scholar
Niven, K., Garcia, D., Lowe, I. V. D., Holman, D., & Mansell, W. (2015). Becoming popular: Interpersonal emotion regulation predicts relationship formation in real life social networks. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01452NivenK.GarciaD.LoweI. V. D.HolmanD.MansellW.(2015)Becoming popular: Interpersonal emotion regulation predicts relationship formation in real life social networks610.3389/fpsyg.2015.01452Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100–130.ObstfeldD.(2005)Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation5010013010.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.100Search in Google Scholar
Ortiz-Arroyo, D. (2010). Discovering sets of key players in social networks. In A. Abraham, A. Hassanien, & V. Snášel (Eds.), Computational social network analysis: Trends, tools, and research advances (pp. 27–48). London, UK: Springer-VerlagOrtiz-ArroyoD.(2010)Discovering sets of key players in social networksInAbrahamA.HassanienA.SnášelV.(Eds.),(pp.2748).London, UKSpringer-Verlag10.1007/978-1-84882-229-0_2Search in Google Scholar
Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., & Ragan, D. T. (2015). Social networks and the diffusion of adolescent problem behavior: reliable estimates of selection and influence from sixth through ninth grades. Prevention Science, 16, 832–843. 10.1007/s11121-015-0558-7OsgoodD. W.FeinbergM. E.RaganD. T.(2015)Social networks and the diffusion of adolescent problem behavior: reliable estimates of selection and influence from sixth through ninth grades1683284310.1007/s11121-015-0558-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Parks, M. R. (1977). Anomia and close friendship communication networks. Human Communication Research, 4, 48–57.ParksM. R.(1977)Anomia and close friendship communication networks4485710.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00596.xSearch in Google Scholar
Parks, M. R. (2016). Social networks and relationships. In C. R. Berger and M. E. Roloff (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication (1st ed.), pp. 1–9. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic0066ParksM. R.(2016)Social networks and relationshipsInBergerC. R.RoloffM. E.(eds.),(1st ed.), pp.19New York, NYWiley & Sons10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic0066Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Parks, M. R. (2017). Embracing the challenges and opportunities of mixed-media relationships. Human Communication Research, 43, 505–517. 10.1111/hcre.12125ParksM. R.(2017)Embracing the challenges and opportunities of mixed-media relationships4350551710.1111/hcre.12125Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T.A., Boda, Z., Vörös, A., & Preciado, P. (2015). Manual for SIENA version 4.0. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics; Nuffield College.RipleyR. M.SnijdersT.A.BodaZ.VörösA.PreciadoP.(2015)OxfordUniversity of Oxford, Department of Statistics; Nuffield CollegeSearch in Google Scholar
Segrin, C., & Kinney, T. (1995). Social skills deficits among the socially anxious: Rejection from others and loneliness. Motivation and Emotion, 19, 1–24. 10.1007/bf02260670SegrinC.KinneyT.(1995)Social skills deficits among the socially anxious: Rejection from others and loneliness1912410.1007/bf02260670Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Selden, M., & Goodie, A. S. (2018). Review of the effects of Five Factor Model personality traits on network structures and perceptions of structure. Social Networks, 52, 81–99. 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.05.007SeldenM.GoodieA. S.(2018)Review of the effects of Five Factor Model personality traits on network structures and perceptions of structure52819910.1016/j.socnet.2017.05.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shumate, M. (2012). The evolution of the HIV/AIDS NGO hyperlink network. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17, 120–134. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01569.xShumateM.(2012)The evolution of the HIV/AIDS NGO hyperlink network1712013410.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01569.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sluzki, C. E. (2010). Personal social networks and health: Conceptual and clinical implications of their reciprocal impact. Families, Systems, & Health, 28, 1–18. 10.1037/a0019061SluzkiC. E.(2010)Personal social networks and health: Conceptual and clinical implications of their reciprocal impact2811810.1037/a0019061Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Smith, J., & Moody, J. (2013). Structural effects of network sampling coverage I: Nodes missing at random. Social Networks, 35, 652–668. 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.09.003SmithJ.MoodyJ.(2013)Structural effects of network sampling coverage I: Nodes missing at random3565266810.1016/j.socnet.2013.09.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., & Carpenter, C. J. (2018). Who persuades who? An analysis of persuasion Choices related to antibiotic-free food. Health Communication, 33, 478–488. 10.1080/10410236.2016.1278498SmithR. A.CarpenterC. J.(2018)Who persuades who? An analysis of persuasion Choices related to antibiotic-free food3347848810.1080/10410236.2016.1278498Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., & Fink, E. L. (2010). Compliance dynamics within a simulated friendship network I: The effects of agency, tactic, and node centrality. Human Communication Research, 36, 232–260. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01375.xSmithR. A.FinkE. L.(2010)Compliance dynamics within a simulated friendship network I: The effects of agency, tactic, and node centrality3623226010.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01375.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., & Fink, E. L. (2015). Understanding the influential people and social structures shaping compliance. Journal of Social Structure, 16.SmithR. A.FinkE. L.(2015)Understanding the influential people and social structures shaping compliance1610.21307/joss-2019-014Search in Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., Zhu, X., & Fink, E. L. (2017). Understanding the effects of stigma messages: Danger appraisal and message judgments. Health Communication. Advance online publication. 10.1080/10410236.2017.1405487SmithR. A.ZhuX.FinkE. L.(2017)Understanding the effects of stigma messages: Danger appraisal and message judgmentsAdvance online publication.10.1080/10410236.2017.1405487Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology, 31, 361–395. 10.1111/0081-1750.00099SnijdersT. A.(2001)The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics3136139510.1111/0081-1750.00099Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. In P., Carrington, J., Scott, & S., Wasserman. (Eds.) Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, pp. 215–247. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.SnijdersT. A. B.(2005)Models for longitudinal network dataInCarringtonP.ScottJ.WassermanS.(Eds.)pp.215247New York, NYCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511811395.011Search in Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). Analyzing dynamics of non-directed social networks. Retrieved from https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/siena/TwoSided_sa.pdf.SnijdersT. A. B.(2007)Retrieved fromhttps://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/siena/TwoSided_sa.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Snijders, T.A.B., van de Bunt, G.G., & Steglich, C.E.G. (2010). Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60. 10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004SnijdersT.A.B.van de BuntG.G.SteglichC.E.G.(2010)Introduction to actor-based models for network dynamics32446010.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Steglich, C., Sinclair, P., Holliday, J., & Moore, L. (2012). Actor-based analysis of peer influence in A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial (ASSIST). Social Networks, 34, 359–369. 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.001SteglichC.SinclairP.HollidayJ.MooreL.(2012)Actor-based analysis of peer influence in A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial (ASSIST)3435936910.1016/j.socnet.2010.07.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stephanone, M. A., Iacobucci, A., & Svetieva, E. (2016). Developing the network awareness construct: Evidence supporting the ability to understand novel social situations. Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp. 2028–2037). 10.1109/HICSS.2016.256StephanoneM. A.IacobucciA.SvetievaE.(2016)Developing the network awareness construct: Evidence supporting the ability to understand novel social situations(pp.20282037).10.1109/HICSS.2016.256Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thompson, J. A. (2005). Proactive personality and job performance: A social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1011–1017. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.1011ThompsonJ. A.(2005)Proactive personality and job performance: A social capital perspective901011101710.1037/0021-9010.90.5.1011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Totterdell, P., Holman, D., & Hukin, A. (2008). Social networkers: Measuring and examining individual differences in propensity to connect with others. Social Networks, 30, 283–296. 10.1016/j.socnet.2008.04.003TotterdellP.HolmanD.HukinA.(2008)Social networkers: Measuring and examining individual differences in propensity to connect with others3028329610.1016/j.socnet.2008.04.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Valente, T. W. (2012). Network interventions. Science, 337, 49–53. 10.1126/science.1217330ValenteT. W.(2012)Network interventions337495310.1126/science.1217330Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Valente, T. W., & Pumpuang, P. (2007). Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Health Education & Behavior, 34, 881–896. 10.1177/1090198106297855ValenteT. W.PumpuangP.(2007)Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change3488189610.1177/1090198106297855Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang, D. J., Shi, X., McFarland, D. A., & Leskovec, J. (2012). Measurement error in network data: A re-classification. Social Networks, 34, 396–409. 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.01.003WangD. J.ShiX.McFarlandD. A.LeskovecJ.(2012)Measurement error in network data: A re-classification3439640910.1016/j.socnet.2012.01.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Whitbred, R., Fonti, F., Steglich, C., & Contractor, N. (2011). From microactions to macrostructure and back: A structurational approach to the evolution of organizational networks. Human Communication Research, 37, 404–433. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01404.xWhitbredR.FontiF.SteglichC.ContractorN.(2011)From microactions to macrostructure and back: A structurational approach to the evolution of organizational networks3740443310.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01404.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar