Characterization of Pterotylenchus cecidogenus in Desmodium ovalifolium cover crop from oil palm plantations in central Colombia
Publié en ligne: 01 déc. 2021
Pages: 1 - 14
Reçu: 16 nov. 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2021-099
Mots clés
© 2021 Oscar Velandia et al., published by Sciendo.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Colombia is the fourth largest palm oil producer in the world and the first in Latin America. The country has more than 535,000 hectares planted in 112 towns across 20 states, making palm oil one of the main national agricultural sectors (Fedepalma, 2018; SISPA 2019). However, Colombian oil palm production is affected by two lethal diseases (sudden wilt and lethal wilt). In both cases, the primary management strategy is to eliminate grasses and establish legume cover crops (Arango et al., 2011; Sierra et al., 2014).
Legume cover crops are widespread and are considered essential components of productive systems, including oil palm, rubber, coffee, and bananas (Baligar et al., 2006). For oil palm, the cover is established in the immature stage of the crop, during which palm foliage cannot protect the soil from solar radiation, wind, and erosion (Ruíz and Molina, 2014). D.
The first symptoms associated with
The nematode does not inhibit
The stem gall nematode
The cultivation of oil palm is a growing industry in the Colombian agricultural sector. Until recently,
We visited 30 oil palm plantations (
Locations of plantations sampled for the recognition of nematodes in
Sample No. | Coordinate Length | Latitude | Location | Oil palm planting year | Presence of galls in |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6,7073 | ‒74,0007 | Puerto Parra (Santander) | 2013 | + |
2 | 6,7073 | ‒73,9994 | Puerto Parra (Santander) | 2012 | + |
3 | 6,7722 | ‒74,0502 | Puerto Parra (Santander) | 2013 | + |
4 | 6,9736 | ‒73,6815 | Barrancabermeja (Santander) | 2012 | + |
5 | 6,9066 | ‒73,6816 | San Vicente de Chucurí (Santander) | 2007 | + |
6 | 6,9823 | ‒73,6232 | San Vicente de Chucurí (Santander) | 2004 | + |
7 | 7,0328 | ‒73,5576 | San Vicente de Chucurí (Santander) | 2010 | ‒ |
8 | 7,2072 | ‒73,5793 | Puerto Wilches (Santander) | 2013 | + |
9 | 7,2636 | ‒73,5804 | Rio Negro (Santander) | 2012 | ‒ |
10 | 7,6562 | ‒73,5765 | Rio Negro (Santander) | 2012 | ‒ |
11 | 7,2308 | ‒73,5588 | Sabana de Torres (Santander) | 2001 | + |
12 | 7,1554 | ‒73,5183 | Girón (Santander) | 2014 | ‒ |
13 | 7,1655 | ‒73,5009 | Girón (Santander) | 2013 | ‒ |
14 | 7,3257 | ‒73,5661 | Sabana de Torres (Santander) | 2007 | ‒ |
15 | 7,3862 | ‒73,5256 | Sabana de Torres (Santander) | 2013 | + |
16 | 6,7806 | ‒73,9080 | Simacota (Santander) | 2010 | ‒ |
17 | 6,7781 | ‒73,9042 | Simacota (Santander) | 2010 | ‒ |
18 | 6,7923 | ‒73,7590 | Simacota (Santander) | 1999 | + |
19 | 7,3116 | ‒73,8327 | Puerto Wilches (Santander) | 2014 | + |
20 | 7,3000 | ‒73,8793 | Puerto Wilches (Santander) | 2010 | ‒ |
21 | 7,2451 | ‒73,8438 | Puerto Wilches (Santander) | 1997 | + |
22 | 7,2836 | ‒73,7143 | Puerto Wilches (Santander) | 2006 | + |
23 | 7,3301 | ‒73,6687 | Puerto Wilches (Santander) | 2009 | + |
24 | 7,2260 | ‒73,5466 | Sabana de Torres (Santander) | 2013 | ‒ |
25 | 7,2340 | ‒73,5445 | Sabana de Torres (Santander) | 2013 | ‒ |
26 | 7,7864 | ‒73,4530 | San Alberto (Cesar) | 2008 | ‒ |
27 | 7,7864 | ‒73,4538 | San Alberto (Cesar) | 2009 | ‒ |
28 | 7,6551 | ‒73,3853 | La Esperanza (Norte de Santander) | 2008 | + |
29 | 7,7678 | ‒73,4023 | San Alberto (Cesar) | 2005 | + |
30 | 7,2159 | ‒73,5777 | Sabana de Torres (Santander) | 2008 | + |
Note: +presence of galls, ‒ absence of galls.
Symptomatic tissue samples as stems (with or without galls), leaves, pods, and inflorescences were collected and kept in labeled plastic bags and refrigerated until processing. Simultaneously, at locations where plants with symptoms were found, samples of young roots and rhizospheric soil were collected from close to the area with the highest concentration of roots in order to determine if the nematode affected the root system or survived in the ground.
Nematodes were extracted using the oxygenation-decantation method (Ravichandra, 2014). In brief, 1 g of fresh tissue from each of the sampled organs was cut into small portions and placed in a decantation sieve without a paper towel but with enough water to cover the sample. After 24 h, the decantation plate with the nematode suspension was removed and concentrated to 20 mL with a 400-mesh sieve (Varón de Agudelo and Castillo, 2001).
Soil nematodes were extracted by suspension, filtration, and decantation methods (Ravichandra, 2014). In brief, 100 cm3 of soil was placed in a container with water. After stirring for 2 min, the suspension was passed through a series of three sieves arranged from larger to smaller mesh diameters (reference No. 20 = 840 µm, 200 = 75 µm, 400 = 37 µm). The contents of the last two sieves were collected for decantation using a sieve previously arranged with a paper towel, and rested on a decantation plate with sufficient water. After 24 hr, the nematode suspension contained in the decantation plate was removed and concentrated to 20 mL with a 400-mesh sieve (Varón de Agudelo and Castillo, 2001).
For the morphological and morphometric identification of
Morphometric data for
Measurement | Pterotylenchus cecidogenus (females)1 n = 23 | Pterotylenchus cecidogenus (females)2 n = 30 | Orrina phyllobia (females)3 n = 20 | Ditylenchus phyllobius(females)4 n = not available | Ditylenchus phyllobius(females)5 n = not available |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Body length | 708.4 ± 36.5 (646.4–790.3) | 640 (590–800) | 696.2 (637–785) | (590–840) | 684 (592–838) |
|
30.5 ± 1.8 (26.5–33.7) | 28 (22–35) | 31.6 (22.5–39) | (20–32) | 25 (20–32) |
|
12.5 ± 1.6 (11.1–17.4) | 11.0 (9.6–12.5) | 18.3 (17–19.6) | (11.4–17.6) | 14.6 (11.4–17.6) |
|
4.2 ± 0.4 (2.8–4.8) | 4.5 (3.6–5.2) | 4.4 (3.5–5.6) | (2.9–4.5) | 3.7 (2.9–4.5) |
V% | 82 ± 0.9 (80.0–84.3) | 82 (80.0–84.0) | 79.2 (78–81) | (78–85) | 81 (78–84) |
Stylet | 9.1 ± 2.4 (5.2–11.9) | 9.5 (8.0–11.0) | 9 (8–9) | (9–10) | (9–11) |
Max. body diameter | 23.2 ± 1.3 (21.0–26.6) | 22 (20.0–25.0) | - | - | - |
Anal body diameter | 13.5 ± 1.0 (11.8–14.9) | - | - | - | - |
Tail length | 57,6 ± 6.1 (40.4–64.1) | 60 (53.0–68.0) | - | - | - |
Note:
DNA extraction was performed using the proteinase K method (Riascos-Ortiz et al., 2019). In brief, the nematodes were divided into three parts with a sterile scalpel and transferred to Eppendorf tubes with 15 µL lysis buffer (50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris pH 8.0, 15 mM MgCl2, 0.5% Triton × 100, 4.5% Tween 20, and 0.09% Proteinase K). Subsequently, the tubes were incubated at ‒80°C for 15 min, 65 °C for 1 h, and 95°C for 15 min, centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 1 min, and stored at ‒20°C. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the expansion segment D2-D3 of the large subunit of ribosomal DNA (28S) was performed with the primers D2A (5′-ACAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGTTG-3′) forward and D3B (5′-TCCTCGGAAGGAACCAGCTACTA-3′) reverse, according to De Ley et al. (1999). In addition, the partial region of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), which includes ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2, was amplified using the primers TW81 forward (5′-GTTTCCGTAGGTGAACCTGC-3′) and AB28 reverse (5′-ATATGCTTAAGTTCAGCGGGT-3′), as proposed by Maafi et al. (2003). The PCR conditions for the amplification of both partial regions were initial denaturation for 2 min at 94°C, followed by 40 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 55°C, 1 min at 72°C, and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. A total of 25 PCR products were sequenced in both directions by Bionner (South Korea).
The consensus sequences obtained (12 of D2–D3 and 13 of ITS) were edited using the Geneious software (Kearse et al., 2012). Once the sequence editions were carried out, their identities were confirmed using the BLASTn software (
Information of sequences D2-D3 and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) downloaded from GenBank and obtained in the present study.
Species name | Location | Host plant | D2-D3 accession number | ITSaccession number | Reference or source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Colombia |
|
MW208689; MW208690; MZ404621; MZ404622; MZ404623; MZ404624; MZ404625; MZ404626; MZ404627; MZ404628; MZ404629; MZ404630 | MZ449098;MZ449099;MZ449100;MZ449101;MZ449102;MZ449103;MZ449104;MZ449105;MZ449106;MZ449107;MZ449108;MZ449109;MZ449110 | Present study |
|
China |
|
DQ328723; KC818620 | - | Subbotin et al. (2006) |
|
Russia |
|
- | AF396351 | Subbotin et al. (2004) |
|
USA |
|
- | AM888393; KU052862 | Song et al. (2015) |
|
USA |
|
- | MK032870 | Cid del Prado Vera et al. (2018) |
|
Chile | - | DQ328724 | - | Subbotin et al. (2006) |
|
China |
|
JN885540 | - | Yao et al. (2012) |
|
Belgium; China |
|
DQ328721 | AF396365; JN885538 | (Subbotin et al., 2004; Subbotin et al., 2006) |
|
USA |
|
- | MK032869 | Cid del Prado Vera et al. (2018) |
|
Russia |
|
DQ328720 | AF396315; AF396318 | (Subbotin et al., 2004; Subbotin et al., 2006) |
|
Russia | - | DQ328722 | - | Subbotin et al. (2006) |
|
Russia; Poland; China; Iran |
|
DQ328727; EU400639; HQ235698 | KC923223; KC923224 | (Subbotin et al., 2006; Subbotin et al., 2011; Jeszke et al., 2013; Mahmoudi et al., 2020) |
|
Yemen; Mexico |
|
JF327759 | KY348764 | Rosas-Hernández et al. (2017) |
|
Brazil |
|
JQ429769; JQ429770 | JQ429778; JQ429779 | Oliveira et al. (2013) |
|
Brazil |
|
JQ429772 | - | Oliveira et al. (2013) |
|
Italy |
|
KF612015 | - | Vovlas et al. (2015) |
|
Mexico |
|
KT192617, KT192618 | KT192615; KT192616 | Medina et al. (2016) |
|
Iran |
|
KX463285 | KX463286 | Esmaeili et al. (2017) |
|
Canada |
|
MG551902 | MG386845 | Madani and Tenuta (2018) |
|
Italy; Iran |
|
HQ219216 | KJ653270 | Vovlas et al. (2011) |
|
China |
|
KX426054 | JN635037; JX040545 | Zhang et al. (2014) |
|
Germany |
|
AY589364 | - | Ye et al. (2007) |
|
Iran |
|
MG742325 | - | Yaghoubi et al. (2018) |
|
USA |
|
HM452377 | - | Bostrom et al., (2011) |
|
Colombia |
|
- | GQ281456 | Múnera et al. (2010) |
To quantify the nematode populations present in 1 gram of fresh tissue in each sample, three aliquots of 1 mL were taken and counted in a chamber under a light microscope (Olympus PX40, Allentown, PA) and an adapted camera (Olympus DP 73, Allentown, PA). The same methodology was used to quantify the nematode population in 100 cm3 of soil from each sample. For the analysis of the populations of nematodes present in the soil and tissue of
Absolute frequency = (number of samples in which a genus appears/total samples evaluated) * 100;
Relative frequency = (absolute frequency of the nematode/sum of absolute frequencies) * 100;
Absolute density = number average of individuals per 100 g of soil or number of individuals per 1 g of tissue;
Relative density = (absolute density of the nematode genus/sum of the absolute densities of all genera) × 100;
Prominence value = absolute density * √ absolute frequency;
Relative prominence value = (genus prominence value/sum of the prominence value of all genera) × 100.
We collected 30 samples from 30 plots located on 28 palm oil plantations in the departments of Cesar (26), Santander (3), and Norte de Santander (1), all of which utilized
The symptoms observed in diseased plants of
Figure 1:
Symptoms caused by

The nematodes extracted from
Figure 2:

The amplification of the segment D2-D3 and ITS from the ribosomal DNA region yielded amplicons of 728 and 1000 bp, respectively. The comparison of the sequences against the GenBank database did not present percentages of similarity equal to or greater than 99% with other reference sequences previously reported. However, the sequences of segment D2-D3 were very similar to those of KT192617 and KT192618 (identity levels of 81.06% and 81.14%, respectively; E-value: 0.0) of the species
Phylogenetic analysis based on the use of segment D2-D3 comprised a total of 36 taxa and 824 characters, including gaps, of which 166 were conserved, 636 were variable, and 363 were informative parsimonious sites. Phylogenetic analysis based on the ITS region included 35 taxa and 1499 characters, including gaps, of which 717 were conserved, 736 were variable, and 645 were informative parsimonious sites. In both analyses, the maximum likelihood algorithm grouped
Figure 3:
Phylogenetic tree obtained by the statistical method of maximum likelihood based on the Tamura-Nei model of the consensus sequences of the D2–D3 partial segment of

Figure 4:
Phylogenetic tree obtained by the statistical method of maximum likelihood based on the Tamura-Nei model of the consensus sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of

The juvenile stages and females of
Analysis of the parasitic and ecological parameters in roots showed that the genera of parasitic nematodes of plants with the highest relative importance in
Parasitic and ecological parameters of nematodes associated with
Nematode | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency | Absolute density | Relative density | Prominence value | Relative prominence value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
33,3 | 30,2 | 8,7 | 25,2 | 50,2 | 30,5 |
|
13,3 | 12,1 | 12,8 | 37,1 | 46,7 | 28,3 |
|
30 | 27,3 | 6,2 | 18 | 34 | 20,6 |
|
26,7 | 24,3 | 6,3 | 18,3 | 32,6 | 19,8 |
|
6,7 | 5,9 | 0,5 | 1,4 | 1,3 | 0,76 |
Note: 30 samples (1 g fresh root).
In the rhizospheric soil of
Parasitic and ecological parameters of nematodes in rhizospheric soil of
Nematode genus | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency | Absolute density | Relative density | Prominence value | Relative prominence value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
33.3 | 28,6 | 32,7 | 47,6 | 188,7 | 64,4 |
|
23.3 | 20 | 14,5 | 21,1 | 70 | 23,9 |
|
20 | 17,2 | 10,5 | 15,3 | 46,96 | 16 |
|
13,3 | 11,4 | 4 | 5,8 | 14,6 | 4,98 |
|
10 | 8,6 | 3,5 | 5,1 | 11,1 | 3,8 |
|
6,7 | 5,7 | 1,5 | 2,2 | 3,9 | 1,33 |
|
6,7 | 5,7 | 1,3 | 1,9 | 3,4 | 1,16 |
|
3,3 | 2,8 | 0,7 | 1 | 1,3 | 0,44 |
Note: 30 samples (100 cc of soil).
The symptoms observed in diseased plants of
Based on morphological and morphometric diagnosis, the presence of
The stem nematode
The nematode
In conclusion, in this study, we found a new distribution of the stem-gall nematode