Accès libre

Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Quinisulcius curvus from China

Jianfeng Gu
Jianfeng Gu
, 
Maria Munawar
Maria Munawar
, 
Pablo Castillo
Pablo Castillo
 et 
Bo Cai
Bo Cai
   | 03 nov. 2021
Journal of Nematology's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Publié en ligne: 03 nov. 2021
Pages: 1 - 11
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2021-086
Mots clés
© 2021 Jianfeng Gu et al., published by Sciendo.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Figure 1:

Quinisulcius curvus Female. (A) Entire female; (B) Pharyngeal region; (C-E) Lip region; (F, G) Vulval region; (H) Lateral lines; (I-L) Tail regions. Scale bars (A = 10 μm; B-L = 10 μm) Abbreviation: a=anus; exp = excretory pore; ph = phasmid; v = vulva.
Quinisulcius curvus Female. (A) Entire female; (B) Pharyngeal region; (C-E) Lip region; (F, G) Vulval region; (H) Lateral lines; (I-L) Tail regions. Scale bars (A = 10 μm; B-L = 10 μm) Abbreviation: a=anus; exp = excretory pore; ph = phasmid; v = vulva.

Figure 2:

Phylogenetic relationships within selected genera of subfamily Telotylenchinae and subfamily Merliniinae as inferred from Bayesian analysis using the 18S of the rRNA gene sequence dataset with the TIM1ef + I + G model. Posterior probability of more than 70% is given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences are indicated in bold.
Phylogenetic relationships within selected genera of subfamily Telotylenchinae and subfamily Merliniinae as inferred from Bayesian analysis using the 18S of the rRNA gene sequence dataset with the TIM1ef + I + G model. Posterior probability of more than 70% is given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences are indicated in bold.

Figure 3:

Phylogenetic relationships within selected genera of subfamily Telotylenchinae and subfamily Merliniinae as inferred from Bayesian analysis using the 28S of the rRNA gene sequence dataset with the TIM3 + G model. Posterior probability of more than 70% is given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences are indicated in bold.
Phylogenetic relationships within selected genera of subfamily Telotylenchinae and subfamily Merliniinae as inferred from Bayesian analysis using the 28S of the rRNA gene sequence dataset with the TIM3 + G model. Posterior probability of more than 70% is given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences are indicated in bold.

Figure 4:

Phylogenetic relationships within selected genera of subfamily Telotylenchinae and subfamily Merliniinae as inferred from Bayesian analysis using the ITS of the rRNA gene sequence dataset with the TVM3 + I + G model. Posterior probability of more than 70% is given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences are indicated in bold.
Phylogenetic relationships within selected genera of subfamily Telotylenchinae and subfamily Merliniinae as inferred from Bayesian analysis using the ITS of the rRNA gene sequence dataset with the TVM3 + I + G model. Posterior probability of more than 70% is given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences are indicated in bold.

Comparative morphometrics of Quinisulcius curvus (Williams, 1960) Siddiqi, 1971.

This study Williams, 1960 Mizukubo et al., 1993 Li et al., 1986
Origin Hainan, China Mauritius Thailand Henan, China
Host Guettarda speciosa Sugarcane Maize Brassica caulirapa
Male Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
n 20 - 6 1
L 581 ± 36.7 (503-644) 490-630 547 ± 56.9 (442-606) 603.2
a 27.2 ± 1.6 (24.3-31.0) 29-37 28.5 ± 2.37 (25.7-31.8) 27.3
b 5.0 ± 0.3 (4.6-5.6) 5.3 ± 0.18 (5.0-5.5) 4.9
c 16.5 ± 0.7 (15.3-18.0) 15-18 17.3 ± 1.19 (15.4-18.9) 16.6
c' 2.5 ± 0.2 (2.3-2.9) 2.5 2.5 ± 0.10 (2.3-2.6) -
V 56.9 ± 1.6 (53.6-60.0) 52-57 56.4 ± 0.7 (55.3-57.2) 55.2
MB (median bulb position)a 54.8 ± 11.7 (50.7-93.5) 51 51.0 ± 2.2 (49.2-55.3) -
Lip height 3.0 ± 0.3 (2.6-3.5) - - -
Lip width 6.6 ± 0.4 (5.7-7.2) - - -
Lip diam./lip height 2.2 ± 0.2 (1.8-2.5) - - -
Stylet length 12.6 ± 0.5 (11.5-13.5) 17 14.6 ± 0.60 (13.5-15) 18.2
Conus length 5.2 ± 0.3 (4.5-6.0) - - -
DGO 2.1 ± 0.3 (1.7-2.6) 1.5 1.4 ± 0.2 (1.2-1.7) -
Median bulb length 13.4 ± 0.5 (12.4-14.2) - - -
Median bulb diam. 10.1 ± 0.4 (9.6-11.0) - - -
Median bulb length/diam. 1.3 ± 0.1 (1.2-1.4) - - -
Distance from anterior end to hemizonid 97.7 ± 4.7 (89.0-106.7) - - -
Distance from anterior end to excretory pore 103.6 ± 4.3 (93.2-110.3) - 99 ± 9.1 (83-106) -
Maximum body diam. 21.3 ± 0.9 (19.2-23.0) 19 - -
Vulval body diam. 20.1 ± 0.9 (18.3-22.3) - - -
Anterior reproductive branch 161.1 ± 15.4 (119.7-188.1) - - -
Posterior reproductive branch 157.6 ± 24.7 (109.5-208.0) - - -
Body diam. at anus 14.2 ± 0.7 (13.1-15.7) - - -
Tail length 35.3 ± 2.8 (29.6-40.7) 39 32 ± 1.9 (29-34) -
Tail annuli 18.0 ± 2.0 (15.0-23.0) 15-20 15-18 16-17
Phasmid to tail terminus 24.2 ± 2.4 (19.3-29.3) - - -
eISSN:
2640-396X
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
Volume Open
Sujets de la revue:
Life Sciences, other
RSS Feed de la revue