Dealing with brittleness in the design of expert systems for immunohematology

1.Norman D. Categorization of action slips. Psych Rev 1981;88:1–15.10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.1Search in Google Scholar

2.Fraser JM, Smith PJ, Smith JW. A catalog of errors. Intern J Man-Machine Studies 1992;37:265–307.10.1016/0020-7373(92)90056-QSearch in Google Scholar

3.Michie D. On machine intelligence. New York: Halstead Press, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

4.Smith PJ, Miller TE, Fraser JM, et al. An empirical evaluation of performance on antibody identification tasks. Transfusion 1991;31:313–8.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1991.31491213294.xSearch in Google Scholar

5.Smith PJ, Smith JW, Svirbely JR, et al. Coping with the complexities of multiple-solution problems: a case study. Intern J Man-Machine Studies 1991;35:429–53.10.1016/S0020-7373(05)80086-0Search in Google Scholar

6.Strohm PL, Smith PJ, Fraser JM, et al. Procedural errors in antibody identification. Immunohematology 1991;7:20–2.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-1005Search in Google Scholar

7.Rudmann S, Miller TE, Smith PJ, Smith JW. Problem-based education for immunohematologists. Clin Lab Sc 1993;5:303–9.Search in Google Scholar

8.Layton C, Smith PJ, McCoy E. Design of a cooperative problemsolving system for enroute flight planning: an empirical evaluation. Human Factors 1994;36:94–119.10.1177/001872089403600106Search in Google Scholar

9.Miller P. Expert critiquing systems: practice-based medical consultation by computer. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.10.1007/978-1-4613-8637-7Search in Google Scholar