Do monocyte ADCC assays accurately predict the severity of hemolytic disease of the newborn caused by antibodies to high-frequency antigens?

1.Gunson HH, Phillips PK, Stratton F. Manipulative and inherent errors in anti-D quantitation using the AutoAnalyzer. J Clin Pathol 1972;25:198-205.10.1136/jcp.25.3.198Search in Google Scholar

2.Garratty G. Predicting the clinical significance of red cell antibodies with in vitro cellular assays. Transfus Med Rev 1990;4:297-312.10.1016/S0887-7963(90)70272-6Search in Google Scholar

3.Engeifriet CP, Overbeeke MAM, Dooren MC, Ouwehand WH, von dem Borne AEGKr. Bioassays to determine the clinical significance of red cell alioantibodies based on Fc receptor-induced destruction of red cells sensitized by IgG. Transfusion 1994;34:617-26.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1994.34794330018.xSearch in Google Scholar

4.Zupanska B, Brojer E, Richards Y, Lenkiewicz B, Seyfried H, Howell P. Serological and immunological characteristics of maternal anti-Rh(D) antibodies in predicting the severity of haemolytic disease of the newborn. Vox Sang 1989;56:247-53.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1989.tb02037.xSearch in Google Scholar

5.Report from nine collaborating laboratories. Results of tests with different cellular bioassays in relation to severity of RhD haemolytic disease. Vox Sang 1991;60:225-9.10.1159/000461292Search in Google Scholar

6.Lucas GF, Hadley AG, Nance SJ, Garratty G. Predicting hemolytic disease of the newborn: a comparison of the monocyte monolayer assay and the chemiluminescence test. Transfusion 1993;33:484-7.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.33693296810.xSearch in Google Scholar

7.Gamer SF, Gorick BD, Lai WYY, et al. Prediction of the severity of haemolytic disease of the newborn: quantitative IgG anti-D subclass determinations explain the correlation with functional assay results. Vox Sang 1995;68:169-76.Search in Google Scholar

8.Kaye T, Williams EM. Gamer SF, Leak MR, Lumley H. Anti-Sc I in pregnancy. Transfusion 1990;30:439-40.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1990.30590296379.xSearch in Google Scholar

9.Leak M , Poole j, Kaye T, Garner S. et al. The rare M^kM^k phenotype in a Turkish antenatal patient and evidence for clinical significance of anti-En^a (abstract). Tranfus Med 1990;(Supp 1):26.Search in Google Scholar

10.Powell. V, Habash J, Piazzarro I, Lubenko A, Daniels G, Contreras M. A.nti-Wr^b and/or En^aFR detected in the serum of a Mi^v/M^k antenatal patient (abstract), Tranfus Med 1990; (Suppl):26.Search in Google Scholar

11.Habash J, Devenish A, Macdonald S, Gamer S, Contreras M. A further example of anti-Di^b not causing haemotytic disease of the newborn. Vox Sang 1991;61:77.Search in Google Scholar

12.Lubenko A, Contreras M, Portugal CL, et al. Severe haemolytic disease in an infant born to an Rhnull proposita. Vox Sang 1992;63:43-7.Search in Google Scholar

13.Walker RH, ed. Technical manual. 11th ed. Bethesda, Ml): American Association of Blood Banks, 1993:661.Search in Google Scholar

14.Marsh WL. Scoring of hemagglutination reactions. Transfusion 1972;12:352-3.10.1111/j.1537-2995.1972.tb04459.xSearch in Google Scholar

15.Engelfriet CP, Ouwehand WH. ADCC and other cellular bioassays for predicting the clinical significance of red cell alio antibodies. In: Contreras M, ed. Blood transfusion: the impact of new technologies. Bailliere′s Clinical Haematology. London, England: Bailliere Tindall. 1990:321-37.10.1016/S0950-3536(05)80053-8Search in Google Scholar

16.Garner SF, Thomson AR, Lubenko A, Savage J. Monocyte isolation by flow cytometer monitored centrifugal elutriation: a valuable tool for antibody dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity assays. Br J Biomed Sci 1994;51:35-43.Search in Google Scholar

17.Dooren MC, Kuijpers RWAM, Joekes EC, et al. Protection against immune haemolytic disease of newborn infants by maternal monocyte-reactive IgG alloantibodies (anti-HLA-DR). Lancet 1992;339:1067-70.10.1016/0140-6736(92)90661-LSearch in Google Scholar

18.Kuijpers RWAM, Dooren MC, von dem Borne AEGKr, Ouwehand WH. Detection of human monocyte-reactive alloantibodies by flow cytometry following selective down modulation of the Fc receptor I. Blood 1991;78:2150-6.10.1182/blood.V78.8.2150.2150Search in Google Scholar

19.Novotny VMJ, Kanhai HHH, Overbeeke MAM, Nijp-Schaman A, Harvey MS, Brand A. Misleading results in the determination of haemolytic disease of the newborn using antibody titration and ADCC in a woman with anti-Lub. Vox Sang 1992;62:49-52.Search in Google Scholar

20.Longster GH, North DI. Robinson EAE. Four examples of anti-In^b detected during pregnancy. Clin Lab Hematol 1981;3:351-6.Search in Google Scholar

21.Spring FA, Dalchau R. Daniels GL, et al The In^a and In^b blood group antigens are located on a glycoprotein of 80,000 MW (the CDw44 glycoprotein) whose expression is influenced by the In(Lu) gene. Immunology 1988;64:37-43.Search in Google Scholar

22.Anstee DJ, Gardner B, Spring FA, et al. New monoclonal antibodies in CD44 and CD58: their use to quantify CD44 and CD58 on normal human esythrocytes and to compare the distribution of CD44 and CD58 in human tissues. Immunology 1991; 74:197-205.Search in Google Scholar

23.Stoll M, Dalchau R, Schmidt RE. Cluster report: CD44. in; Knapp W, Dorken B, Gilks WR, Rieber EP, Schmidt RE, Stein H, von dem Borne AEGKr, eds. Leucocyte typing. IV. White cell differentiation antigens. Oxford University Press, 1989:619-22.Search in Google Scholar

24.Shaw S, Luce GG, Gilks WR, et al. BP 1.3 leucocyte differentiation antigen database. In: Schlossman SF, Boumsell L, Gilks W, Harlen JM. Kishimoto T, Morimoto C, Ritz J, Shaw S, Silverstein R, Springer T, Tedder TF, Todd RF, eds. Leucocyte typing. V. White cell differentiation antigens. Oxford University Press 1995:16-198.Search in Google Scholar