Landsteiner K.Zur Kenntnis der antifermentativen, lytischen und agglutinierenden Wirkungen des Blutserums und der Lymphl. Zbl Bakt 1900;27: 357-62.Search in Google Scholar
Ottenburg R. Transfusion and arterial anastomosis. Some experiments in arterial anastomosis and a study of transfusion with presentation of two clinical cases. Ann Surg 1908;47:486-505.10.1097/00000658-190804000-00002141448917862135Search in Google Scholar
Coombs RRA, Mourant AE, Race RR.A new test for the detection of weak and “incomplete” Rh agglutinins. Br J Exp Pathol 1945:26:255-66.10.1007/978-94-011-6138-1_10Search in Google Scholar
Judd WJ. Modern approaches to pretransfusion testing. Immunohematology 1999;15:41-52.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-610Search in Google Scholar
Issitt PD. Antibody screening: elimination of another piece of the test. Transfusion 1999:39: 229-30.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39399219277.x10204583Search in Google Scholar
Standards for blood banks and transfusion services. 21st ed. Bethesda, MD: American Association of Blood Banks, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Standards for transfusion medicine. 6th ed. Saskatoon, SK: Canadian Society for Transfusion Medicine, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
Moore BPL, Humphreys P, Lovett-Moseley CA. Serological and immunological methods. 7th ed. Toronto,ON:Canadian Red Cross Society, 1972.Search in Google Scholar
Brecher ME, ed. Technical manual. 14th ed. Bethesda, MD: American Association of Blood Banks, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Gamma-clone® anti-D (monoclonal/polyclonal blend) [package insert]. Houston, TX: Gamma Biologicals Limited; 1996.Search in Google Scholar
Novaclone™ (monoclonal/polyclonal blend) [package insert]. Dartmouth, NS. Canada: Dominion Biologicals Limited; 1996.Search in Google Scholar
Gamma-clone® anti-D (monoclonal blend) [package insert]. Houston, TX: Gamma Biologicals Limited; 2000.Search in Google Scholar
Padget BJ, Hannon JL. Discrepencies in Rh(D) typing of sensitized red blood cells using monoclonal/polyclonal anti-D reagents: case report and review. Immunohemotology 2001;17:10-3.10.21307/immunohematology-2019-534Search in Google Scholar
International forum:What is the best technique for the detection of red cell alloantibodies? Vox Sang 1995;69:292-300.10.1111/j.1423-0410.1995.tb02613.xSearch in Google Scholar
Wright MS, Issitt PD. Anticomplement and the indirect AHG test.Transfusion 1979;19:688-94.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1979.19680104094.x118556Search in Google Scholar
Beck ML, Marsh WL. Complement and the antiglobulin test.Transfusion 1977;17:529.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1977.17578014598.x302997Search in Google Scholar
Judd WJ, Steiner EA, Oberman HA, Nance SJ. Can the reading for serologic reactivity following 37°C incubation be omitted? Transfusion 1992;32:304-8.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1992.32492263441.x1585433Search in Google Scholar
Judd WJ, Fullen DR, Steiner EA,Davenport RD, Knafl PC. Revisiting the issue: can the reading for serologic reactivity following 37°C incubation be omitted? Transfusion 1999;39:295-9.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39399219287.x10204593Search in Google Scholar
Judd WJ, Butch SH, Oberman HA, Steiner EA, Bauer RC. The evaluation of a positive direct antiglobulin test in pretransfusion testing. Transfusion 1980;20: 17-23.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1980.20180125036.x6986682Search in Google Scholar
Judd WJ,Barnes BA, Steiner EA,Oberman HA,Averill DB, Butch SH. The evaluation of a positive direct antiglobulin test in pretransfusion testing revisited. Transfusion 1986;26:220-4.10.1046/j.1537-2995.1986.26386209372.x3705135Search in Google Scholar
