Salt and sugar detection system using a compact microstrip patch antenna
et
15 sept. 2020
À propos de cet article
Catégorie d'article: Research-Article
Publié en ligne: 15 sept. 2020
Pages: 1 - 9
Reçu: 19 mai 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2020-027
Mots clés
© 2020 S. N. Njokweni et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1:

Figure 2:

Figure 3:

Figure 4:

Figure 5:

Return loss of the antenna in different concentrations of sugar in water_
S. No. | Frequency | Return loss (concentration: 20%) | Return loss (concentration: 50%) | Return loss (concentration: 80%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2.38 GHz | 23.558 dB | 19.123 dB | 13.022 dB |
2 | 2.56 GHz | 24.251 dB | 22.012 dB | 13.223 dB |
3 | 2.72 GHz | 24.097 dB | 21.293 dB | 13.144 dB |
4 | 2.86 GHz | 22.044 dB | 17.272 dB | 11.962 dB |
Comparison of proposed antenna with existing antennas for salt and sugar detection_
Reference | Antenna type | Center frequency | Dimensions of the antenna | Substrate parameters |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Rectangular microstrip antenna | 2.45 GHz | 0.47 |
|
|
Circular microstrip antenna | 2.45 GHz | 0.465 |
|
|
Square microstrip antenna | 2.45 GHz | 0.529 |
|
|
Circulated psi-shaped patch | 16 GHz | 1.28 |
|
|
Crescent-shaped microstrip antenna | 10.6 GHz | 1.13 |
|
|
Fork-shaped patch | 9.5 GHz | 0.76 |
|
Proposed method | Rectangular microstrip antenna | 2.4 GHz | 0.41 |
|
Optimized dimensions of the compact antenna_
S. No. | Dimensional parameter | Values |
---|---|---|
1 |
|
25.65 mm |
2 |
|
25.65 mm |
3 |
|
51.3 mm |
4 |
|
51.3 mm |
5 |
|
25.65 mm |
6 |
|
25.65 mm |
7 |
|
24.41 mm |
8 |
|
5.1525 mm |
9 |
|
2.5875 mm |
10 |
|
1.5 mm |
11 |
|
0.035 mm |
12 |
|
4.3 |
Dimensions of the antenna with and without DGS_
S. No. | Antenna type | Area of patch | Area of ground plane |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Antenna without DGS | 838.1 mm2 | 3,352.4 mm2 |
2 | Antenna with DGS | 657.9 mm2 | 2,631.7 mm2 |
Gain, directivity, and efficiencies of the antenna at 2_4 GHz 2_4 GHz _
Radiation efficiency | Total efficiency | Max. gain | Max. directivity |
---|---|---|---|
−1.84 dB | −1.97 dB | 2.12 dB | 3.95 dBi |
Effect of slot length on various parameters_
S. No. | Slot length | Resonant frequency | VSWR (at 2.4 GHz) | | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 24.95 mm | 2.466 GHz | 1.514 | −13.433 dB |
2 | 25.65 mm | 2.402 GHz | 1.389 | −15.768 dB |
3 | 26.45 mm | 2.336 GHz | 1.68 | −11.913 dB |
4 | 28.95 mm | 2.082 GHz | 4.624 | −3.817 dB |
Return loss of the antenna in different concentrations of salt in water_
S. No. | Frequency | Return loss (concentration: 20%) | Return loss (concentration: 50%) | Return loss (concentration: 80%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2.38 GHz | 23.271 dB | 21.017 dB | 13.334 dB |
2 | 2.56 GHz | 23.757 dB | 20.54 dB | 13.281 dB |
3 | 2.72 GHz |
24.582 dB | 19.84 dB | 13.046 dB |
4 | 2.86 GHz | 23.253 dB | 17.095 dB | 11.691 dB |