[
[1] J. Robst, “Education and job match: The relatedness of college major and work,”Economics of Education Review, vol. 26, 2007, p. 397407.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Bauer, T. K., Educational mismatch and wages: A panel analysis. Economics of Education Review, 21(3), 221–229, 2002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] Shaw, Kathryn L. “A formulation of the earnings function using the concept of occupational investment.”Journal of Human Resources (1984): 319-340.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] Du Preez, N; Louw, L. 2008. A Framework for Managing the Innovation Process, Picmet 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] Enkel, Ellen, Oliver Gassmann, and Henry Chesbrough. “Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon.” R&d Management 39.4 (2009): 311-316.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic management journal, 27(2), 131-150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation?. Research policy, 39(6), 699-709.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] Garrett, Jesse James. “The Elements of User Experience.” Jjg. Net (2004).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] Marais, S. J., and C. S. L. Schutte. “The development of open innovation models to assist the innovation process.” 23rd Annual SAIIE Conference Conference Proceedings. 2009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] Jesic, D., Kovacevic, J., & Stankovic, M. (2011, June). Web technologies for open innovation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Web Science Conference (p. 20). ACM.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] Aleman-Meza, B., Bojars, U., Boley, H., Breslin, J. G., Mochol, M., Polleres, A., et al. 2007. Combining RDF vocabularies for expert finding. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4519, 235. Springer. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/p6u10781711xp102.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] Ziegler, C.-N., Simon, K., and Lausen, G. 2006. Automatic Computation of Semantic Proximity Using Taxonomic Knowledge Categories and Subject Descriptors. CIKM ’06 Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (pp. 465-474). Arlington, Virginia, USA:ACM New York, NY, USA. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1183614.1183682.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] Cilibrasi, R. L., and Vitanyi, P. M. B. 2007. The Google Similarity Distance. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19(3), 370-383. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2007.48.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Hastings, G. 2007. Social Marketing - Why should the devil have all the best tunes? Elsevier Ltd.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] Granovetter, M. 1983. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, Volume 1 (1983), 201- 233.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] Aleman-Meza, B., Bojars, U., Boley, H., Breslin, J. G., Mochol, M., Polleres, A., et al. 2007. Combining RDF vocabularies for expert finding. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4519, 235. Springer. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/p6u10781711xp102.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] Carmeli, Abraham. “Assessing core intangible resources.” European Management Journal 22.1 (2004): 110-122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Hill, Terry, and Roy Westbrook. “SWOT analysis: it’s time for a product recall.”Long range planning 30.1 (1997): 46-52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20] Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic management journal, 27(2), 131-150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[21] Singh, M., “E-Services and Their Role in B2C E-Commerce’, Journal of Managing Service Quality, 12:2, pp.434 – 446, 2002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[22] S. Comai, M. Matera, and A. Maurino. “A Model and an XSL Framework for Analysing the Quality of WebML Conceptual Schemas”. Proc. of IWCMQ’02 - ER’02 International Workshop on Conceptual Modeling Quality, Tampere, Finland, October 2002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[23] P. Fraternali, M. Matera, and A. Maurino. “WQA: an XSL Framework for Analyzing the Quality of Web Applications”. Proc. of IWWOST’02 – ECOOP’02 International Workshop on Web Oriented Software Technologies, Malaga, Spain, June 2002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[24] Fraternali, Piero, Maristella Matera, and Andrea Maurino. “Conceptual-level log analysis for the evaluation of web application quality.” Web Congress, 2003. Proceedings. First Latin American. IEEE, 2
]Search in Google Scholar
