<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>A three-dimensional slope stability problem involving a spherical failure surface in clay is often used in the literature as a benchmark example against which numerical models are validated. In the existing research literature, the analytical expression has been obtained for the factors of safety by assuming plane-strain mechanisms during slope failure. And the hypothesis does not comply with the actual project due to the size effect of slope and surrounding constraints placed on the slope. This paper compares and analyzes the results of the existing research literature. And the three analytical expressions under the three kinds of rotational model have been given for the factors of safety. In practice, the value of factor of stability obtained by numerical model should be in a range which is determined by rotational model of failure body. In this paper, when subtended angel is equal to 60° , the value of factor of stability obtained by numerical model for benchmark example should be reasonable in the range from 1.191 to 1.588.</p>
</abstract>

A three-dimensional slope stability problem involving a spherical failure surface in clay is often used in the literature as a benchmark example against which numerical models are validated. In the existing research literature, the analytical expression has been obtained for the factors of safety by assuming plane-strain mechanisms during slope failure. And the hypothesis does not comply with the actual project due to the size effect of slope and surrounding constraints placed on the slope. This paper compares and analyzes the results of the existing research literature. And the three analytical expressions under the three kinds of rotational model have been given for the factors of safety. In practice, the value of factor of stability obtained by numerical model should be in a range which is determined by rotational model of failure body. In this paper, when subtended angel is equal to 60° , the value of factor of stability obtained by numerical model for benchmark example should be reasonable in the range from 1.191 to 1.588.

Discussion on the Factors of Stability for Benchmark Example with a Spherical Failure Surface in Clay

International Journal of Advanced Network, Monitoring and Controls

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

A three-dimensional slope stability problem involving a spherical failure surface in clay is often used in the literature as a benchmark example against which...

Discussion on the Factors of Stability for Benchmark Example with a Spherical Failure Surface in Clay

Publié en ligne: 11 avr. 2018

Pages: 49 - 53

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/ijanmc-2017-053

Mots clés
Three-dimensional slope stability analysis, Factor of safety, Spherical failure surface, Numerical model, Planestrain mechanisms, Subtended angle

© 2017 Jinhui Liu et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Discussion on the Factors of Stability for Benchmark Example with a Spherical Failure Surface in Clay

Publié en ligne: 11 avr. 2018

Pages: 49 - 53

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/ijanmc-2017-053

Mots clésThree-dimensional slope stability analysis, Factor of safety, Spherical failure surface, Numerical model, Planestrain mechanisms, Subtended angle

© 2017 Jinhui Liu et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Mots clés
Three-dimensional slope stability analysis, Factor of safety, Spherical failure surface, Numerical model, Planestrain mechanisms, Subtended angle