Do Birds of a Feather Always Flock Together? Deep-Level Diversity as an Organizing Social Principle for Task-Relevant Relationships
et
18 févr. 2024
À propos de cet article
Catégorie d'article: Article
Publié en ligne: 18 févr. 2024
Pages: 113 - 129
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/connections-2019.048
Mots clés
© 2024 Amy Wax et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1:

Figure 2:

ERGM revealing the impact of deep-level homophily on social tie formation_
Covariates | ||||||
edges | 2.45 |
0.71 | — | 1.60 |
0.48 | — |
nodeifactor | ||||||
Nonheterosexual | −0.64 | 0.50 | 0.53 | −0.07 | 0.37 | 0.93 |
Republican | 0.31 | 0.47 | 1.36 | −0.29 | 0.28 | 0.75 |
Other political preference | −0.14 | 0.38 | 0.87 | −0.24 | 0.26 | 0.79 |
Female | −0.10 | 0.39 | 0.90 | −0.09 | 0.26 | 0.91 |
Other gender | 1.08 | 0.86 | 2.94 | 0.39 | 0.61 | 1.48 |
nodeofactor | ||||||
Nonheterosexual | 0.76 | 0.60 | 2.14 | 0.28 | 0.38 | 1.32 |
Republican | 0.28 | 0.45 | 1.32 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 1.21 |
Other political preference | 0.13 | 0.39 | 1.14 | −0.05 | 0.26 | 0.95 |
Female | −0.29 | 0.40 | 0.75 | −0.19 | 0.26 | 0.83 |
Other gender | −1.47 | 0.84 | 0.23 | −0.38 | 0.60 | 0.68 |
nodematch | ||||||
Gender | 0.07 | 0.39 | 1.07 | 0.08 | 0.25 | 1.08 |
Deep-level homophily (nodematch) | ||||||
Sexual orientation | −0.06 | 0.48 | 0.94 | −0.14 | 0.35 | 0.87 |
Political preference | 0.24 | 0.36 | 1.27 | −0.12 | 0.23 | 0.89 |
Binary logistic regression predicting performance for lowest- and highest-performing teams (t = 113)_
Gender diversity (covariate) | −1.34 | 1.21 | 0.26 |
Sexual orientation diversity | −0.08 | 1.22 | 0.92 |
Political preference diversity | 2.25 |
1.23 | 9.52 |
ERGM revealing the impact of deep-level homophily on task-relevant tie formation_
Covariates | ||||||
edges | −5.98 |
0.27 | — | −10.05 |
0.85 | — |
nodeifactor | ||||||
Nonheterosexual | 0.06 | 0.21 | 1.06 | 0.72 | 0.47 | 2.05 |
Republican | 0.16 | 0.18 | 1.17 | 0.12 | 0.44 | 1.13 |
Other political preference | 0.18 | 0.15 | 1.20 | 0.17 | 0.36 | 1.19 |
Female | −0.02 | 0.15 | 0.98 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 1.93 |
Other gender | −0.43 | 0.34 | 0.65 | −0.44 | 0.98 | 0.64 |
nodeofactor | ||||||
Nonheterosexual | −0.44 | 0.22 | 0.64 | −0.52 | 0.55 | 0.59 |
Republican | −0.33 | 0.18 | 0.72 | −0.55 | 0.54 | 0.58 |
Other political preference | 0.09 | 0.15 | 1.09 | 0.55 | 0.34 | 1.73 |
Female | 0.02 | 0.15 | 1.02 | 1.14 |
0.56 | 3.13 |
Other gender | 0.45 | 0.35 | 1.57 | 1.86 |
0.85 | 6.42 |
nodematch | ||||||
Gender | 0.41 |
0.14 | 1.51 | −0.28 | 0.52 | 0.76 |
Deep-level homophily (nodematch) | ||||||
Sexual orientation | −0.41 |
0.20 | 0.66 | 0.55 | 0.45 | 1.73 |
Political preference | 0.12 | 0.14 | 1.13 | 0.69 |
0.31 | 1.99 |