This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Peltonen L. Nickel sensitivity in the general population. Contact Derm 1979;5:27–32.PeltonenL. Nickel sensitivity in the general population. Contact Derm1979;5:27–32.10.1111/j.1600-0536.1979.tb05531.x421456Search in Google Scholar
Golz L, Papageorgiou SN, Jager A. Nickel hypersensitivity and orthodontic treatment. a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contact Derm 2015;73:1–14.GolzLPapageorgiouSNJagerA. Nickel hypersensitivity and orthodontic treatment. a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contact Derm2015;73:1–14.10.1111/cod.1239225880885Search in Google Scholar
Zug KA, Warshaw EM, Fowler JF Jr., Maibach HI, Belsito DL, Pratt MD. Patch-test results of the North American contact dermatitis group 2005-2006. Dermatitis 2009;20:149–160.ZugKAWarshawEMFowlerJFJr.MaibachHIBelsitoDLPrattMD. Patch-test results of the North American contact dermatitis group 2005-2006. Dermatitis2009;20:149–160.10.2310/6620.2009.08097Search in Google Scholar
Fransway AF, Zug KA, Belsito DV, Deleo VA, Fowler JF Jr., Maibach HI. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results for 2007-2008. Dermatitis 2013;24:10–21.FranswayAFZugKABelsitoDVDeleoVAFowlerJFJr.MaibachHI. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results for 2007-2008. Dermatitis2013;24:10–21.10.1097/DER.0b013e318277ca5023340394Search in Google Scholar
Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, Taylor JS, Sasseville D, DeKoven JG, Zirwas MJ. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2009 to 2010. Dermatitis 2013;24:50–59.WarshawEMBelsitoDVTaylorJSSassevilleDDeKovenJGZirwasMJ. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2009 to 2010. Dermatitis2013;24:50–59.10.1097/DER.0b013e3182819c5123474444Search in Google Scholar
Warshaw EM, Maibach HI, Taylor JS, Sasseville D, DeKoven JG, Zirwas MJ. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2011-2012. Dermatitis 2015;26:49–59.WarshawEMMaibachHITaylorJSSassevilleDDeKovenJGZirwasMJ. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2011-2012. Dermatitis2015;26:49–59.10.1097/DER.000000000000009725581671Search in Google Scholar
DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, Sasseville D, Maibach HI, Taylor JS. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results 2013-2014. Dermatitis 2017;28:33–46.DeKovenJGWarshawEMBelsitoDVSassevilleDMaibachHITaylorJS. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results 2013-2014. Dermatitis2017;28:33–46.10.1097/DER.000000000000022527775967Search in Google Scholar
Warshaw EM, Aschenbeck KA, DeKoven JG, Maibach HI, Taylor JS, Sasseville D. Epidemiology of pediatric nickel sensitivity: Retrospective review of North American contact dermatitis group (NACDG) data 1994-2014. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018;79:664–671.WarshawEMAschenbeckKADeKovenJGMaibachHITaylorJSSassevilleD. Epidemiology of pediatric nickel sensitivity: Retrospective review of North American contact dermatitis group (NACDG) data 1994-2014. J Am Acad Dermatol2018;79:664–671.10.1016/j.jaad.2018.02.07129665973Search in Google Scholar
Kerosuo H, Kullaa A, Kerosuo E, Kanerva L, Hensten-Pettersen A. Nickel allergy in relation to orthodontic treatment and piercing of ears. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:148–154.KerosuoHKullaaAKerosuoEKanervaLHensten-PettersenA. Nickel allergy in relation to orthodontic treatment and piercing of ears. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop1996;109:148–154.10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70175-08638560Search in Google Scholar
Lindsten R, Kurol J. Orthodontic appliances in relation to nickel hypersensitivity. A review. J Orofac Orthop 1997;58:100–108.LindstenRKurolJ. Orthodontic appliances in relation to nickel hypersensitivity. A review. J Orofac Orthop1997;58:100–108.10.1007/BF02716959Search in Google Scholar
Ehrlich A, Kucenic M, Belsito DV. Role of body piercing in the induction of metal allergies. Am J Contact Dermat 2001;12:151–155.EhrlichAKucenicMBelsitoDV. Role of body piercing in the induction of metal allergies. Am J Contact Dermat2001;12:151–155.Search in Google Scholar
Fors R, Persson M, Bergström E, Stenlund H, Stymne B, Stenberg B. Lifestyle and nickel allergy in a Swedish adolescent population: Effects of piercing, tattooing and orthodontic appliances. Acta Derm Venereol 2012;92:664–668.ForsRPerssonMBergströmEStenlundHStymneBStenbergB. Lifestyle and nickel allergy in a Swedish adolescent population: Effects of piercing, tattooing and orthodontic appliances. Acta Derm Venereol2012;92:664–668.10.2340/00015555-130522278701Search in Google Scholar
Akiba Y, Watanabe M, Mine A, Ikedo I, Nikawa H. With the aim of treatment guideline development for dental metal allergy and related diseases. Ann Jan Prosthodont Soc 2016;8:327–339.AkibaYWatanabeMMineAIkedoINikawaH. With the aim of treatment guideline development for dental metal allergy and related diseases. Ann Jan Prosthodont Soc2016;8:327–339.10.2186/ajps.8.327Search in Google Scholar
Bondemark L, Tsiopa J. Prevalence of ectopic eruption, impaction, retention and agenesis of the permanent second molar. Angle Orthod 2007;77:773–778.BondemarkLTsiopaJ. Prevalence of ectopic eruption, impaction, retention and agenesis of the permanent second molar. Angle Orthod2007;77:773–778.10.2319/072506-306.117685771Search in Google Scholar
Evans R. Incidence of lower second permanent molar impaction. Br J Orthod 1988;15:199–203.EvansR. Incidence of lower second permanent molar impaction. Br J Orthod1988;15:199–203.10.1179/bjo.15.3.1993262368Search in Google Scholar
Cho SY, Ki Y, Chu V, Chan J. Impaction of permanent mandibular second molars in ethnic Chinese school children. J Can Dent Assoc 2008;74:521.ChoSYKiYChuVChanJ. Impaction of permanent mandibular second molars in ethnic Chinese school children. J Can Dent Assoc2008;74:521.Search in Google Scholar
Magnusson C, Kjellberg H. Impaction and retention of second molars: Diagnosis, treatment and outcome. A retrospective follow-up study. Angle Orthod 2009;79:422–427.MagnussonCKjellbergH. Impaction and retention of second molars: Diagnosis, treatment and outcome. A retrospective follow-up study. Angle Orthod2009;79:422–427.10.2319/021908-97.119413377Search in Google Scholar
Fu PS, Wang JC, Wu YM, Huang TK, Chen WC, Tseng YC. Impacted mandibular second molars. Angle Orthod 2012;82:670–675.FuPSWangJCWuYMHuangTKChenWCTsengYC. Impacted mandibular second molars. Angle Orthod2012;82:670–675.10.2319/102111-656.1884554322229822Search in Google Scholar
Cassetta M, Altieri F, Mambro AD, Galluccio G, Barbato E. Impaction of permanent mandibular second molar: A retrospective study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18:e564–e568.CassettaMAltieriFMambroADGalluccioGBarbatoE. Impaction of permanent mandibular second molar: A retrospective study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal2013;18:e564–e568.10.4317/medoral.18869373108223524438Search in Google Scholar
Turley PK. The management of mesially inclined/impacted mandibular permanent second molars. J World Fed Orthod 2020;9:S45–S53.TurleyPK. The management of mesially inclined/impacted mandibular permanent second molars. J World Fed Orthod2020;9:S45–S53.10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.09.004753293633023732Search in Google Scholar
Warshaw EM, Aschenbeck KA, DeKoven JG, Maibach HI, Taylor JS, Sasseville D. Piercing and metal sensitivity: extended analysis of the North American contact dermatitis group data, 2007-2014. Dermatitis 2017;28:333–341.WarshawEMAschenbeckKADeKovenJGMaibachHITaylorJSSassevilleD. Piercing and metal sensitivity: extended analysis of the North American contact dermatitis group data, 2007-2014. Dermatitis2017;28:333–341.10.1097/DER.000000000000032429135681Search in Google Scholar
Schalock PC, Menné T, Johansen JD, Taylor JS, Maibach HI, Lidén C. Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants – diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use. Contact Derm 2012;66:4–19.SchalockPCMennéTJohansenJDTaylorJSMaibachHILidénC. Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants – diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use. Contact Derm2012;66:4–19.10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01971.x21957996Search in Google Scholar
Kitagawa M, Murakami S, Akashi Y, Oka H, Shintani T, Ogawa I. Current status of dental metal allergy in Japan. J Prosthodont Res 2019;63:309–312.KitagawaMMurakamiSAkashiYOkaHShintaniTOgawaI. Current status of dental metal allergy in Japan. J Prosthodont Res2019;63:309–312.10.1016/j.jpor.2019.01.00330738702Search in Google Scholar
Jensen CS, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O, Vølund A, Menné T. Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulation. Br J Dermatol 2002;146:636–642.JensenCSLisbySBaadsgaardOVølundAMennéT. Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulation. Br J Dermatol2002;146:636–642.10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04666.x11966696Search in Google Scholar
Thyssen JP. Nickel and cobalt allergy before and after nickel regulation-evaluation of a public health intervention. Contact Dermatitis 2011;65:1–68.ThyssenJP. Nickel and cobalt allergy before and after nickel regulation-evaluation of a public health intervention. Contact Dermatitis2011;65:1–68.10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01957.x21777241Search in Google Scholar
Mortz CG, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen KE. Nickel allergy from adolescence to adulthood in the TOACS cohort. Contact Dermatitis 2013;68:348–356.MortzCGBindslev-JensenCAndersenKE. Nickel allergy from adolescence to adulthood in the TOACS cohort. Contact Dermatitis2013;68:348–356.10.1111/cod.1205523692035Search in Google Scholar
Ahlström MG, Thyssen JP, Wennervaldt M, Menné T, Johansen JD. Nickel allergy and allergic contact dermatitis: A clinical review of immunology, epidemiology, exposure, and treatment. Contact Dermatitis 2019;81:227–241.AhlströmMGThyssenJPWennervaldtMMennéTJohansenJD. Nickel allergy and allergic contact dermatitis: A clinical review of immunology, epidemiology, exposure, and treatment. Contact Dermatitis2019;81:227–241.10.1111/cod.1332731140194Search in Google Scholar
Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr. Contemporary orthodontics, 3rd ed.. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000;624–630.ProffitWRFieldsHWJr. Contemporary orthodontics, 3rd ed.. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000;624–630.Search in Google Scholar
Sawicka M, Racka-Pilszak B, Rosnowska-Mazurkiewicz A. Uprighting partially impacted permanent second molars. Angle Orthod 2007;77:148–154.SawickaMRacka-PilszakBRosnowska-MazurkiewiczA. Uprighting partially impacted permanent second molars. Angle Orthod2007;77:148–154.10.2319/010206-461R.117029525Search in Google Scholar
Chang CH, Lin JS, Roberts WE. Ramus screws: the ultimate solution for lower impacted molars. Semin. Orthod 2018;24:135–154.ChangCHLinJSRobertsWE. Ramus screws: the ultimate solution for lower impacted molars. Semin. Orthod2018;24:135–154.10.1053/j.sodo.2018.01.012Search in Google Scholar
Choi YJ, Huh JK, Chung CJ, Kim KH. Rescue therapy with orthodontic traction to manage severely impacted mandibular second molars and to restore an alveolar bone defect. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;150:352–363.ChoiYJHuhJKChungCJKimKH. Rescue therapy with orthodontic traction to manage severely impacted mandibular second molars and to restore an alveolar bone defect. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2016;150:352–363.10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.03127476369Search in Google Scholar
Raghav S, Vinod P, Shashikala KV. The Neoslider appliance for uprighting mesially impacted mandibular second molars. J Clin Orthod 2013;47:553–557.RaghavSVinodPShashikalaKV. The Neoslider appliance for uprighting mesially impacted mandibular second molars. J Clin Orthod2013;47:553–557.Search in Google Scholar
Mcaboy CP, Grumet JT, Siegel EB, Iacopinod AM. Surgical uprighting and repositioning of severely impacted mandibular second molars. JADA 2003;134:1459–1462.McaboyCPGrumetJTSiegelEBIacopinodAM. Surgical uprighting and repositioning of severely impacted mandibular second molars. JADA2003;134:1459–1462.10.14219/jada.archive.2003.007414664263Search in Google Scholar
Caminiti MF, Oguienko O, Reinish EI, Tompson B. Surgical uprighting of mandibular second molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73:e9.CaminitiMFOguienkoOReinishEITompsonB. Surgical uprighting of mandibular second molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg2015;73:e9.10.1016/j.joms.2015.06.014Search in Google Scholar
Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Beta titanium: A new orthodontic alloy. Am J Orthod 1980;77:121–132.BurstoneCJGoldbergAJ. Beta titanium: A new orthodontic alloy. Am J Orthod1980;77:121–132.10.1016/0002-9416(80)90001-96928342Search in Google Scholar
Burstone CJ. Welding of TMA wire clinical applications. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:609–615.BurstoneCJ. Welding of TMA wire clinical applications. J Clin Orthod1987;21:609–615.Search in Google Scholar
Chang H, Tseng Y. A novel β-titanium alloy orthodontic wire. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2018;34:202–206.ChangHTsengY. A novel β-titanium alloy orthodontic wire. Kaohsiung J Med Sci2018;34:202–206.10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.01029655408Search in Google Scholar
Murakami T, Iijima M, Muguruma T, Yano F, Kawashima I, Mizoguchi I. High-cycle fatigue behavior of beta-titanium orthodontic wires. Dent Mater J 2015;34:189–195.MurakamiTIijimaMMugurumaTYanoFKawashimaIMizoguchiI. High-cycle fatigue behavior of beta-titanium orthodontic wires. Dent Mater J2015;34:189–195.10.4012/dmj.2014-01225740165Search in Google Scholar
Takada M, Nakajima A, Kuroda S, Horiuchi S, Shimizu N, Tanaka E. In vitro evaluation of frictional force of a novel elastic bendable orthodontics wire. Angle Orthod 2018;88:602–610.TakadaMNakajimaAKurodaSHoriuchiSShimizuNTanakaE. In vitro evaluation of frictional force of a novel elastic bendable orthodontics wire. Angle Orthod2018;88:602–610.10.2319/111417-779.1818313829799272Search in Google Scholar
