Accès libre

Implementation to Industry and Municipal Sector the Compact Trickle Bed Bioreactors Technology to Odor and Vocs Removal

Anita PARZENTNA-GABOR

Anita PARZENTNA-GABOR

MSc; Ekoinwentyka Ltd., Department of Water and Wastewater Engineering, PhD School, Silesian University of TechnologyGliwice,
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
PARZENTNA-GABOR, Anita
, 
Krzysztof BARBUSIŃSKI

Krzysztof BARBUSIŃSKI

Prof. DSc Eng.; Department of Water and Wastewater Engineering, Silesian University of TechnologyGliwice, Poland
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
BARBUSIŃSKI, Krzysztof
 et 
Damian KASPERCZYK

Damian KASPERCZYK

PhD Eng.; Ekoinwentyka Ltd.Ruda Śląska, Poland
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
KASPERCZYK, Damian
  
08 oct. 2021
Implementation to Industry and Municipal Sector the Compact Trickle Bed Bioreactors Technology to Odor and Vocs Removal's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Publié en ligne: 08 oct. 2021
Pages: 89 - 101
Reçu: 02 août 2021
Accepté: 30 août 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2021-025
Mots clés
© 2021 Anita Parzentna-Gabor et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Figure 1.

Contribution to EU-28 area emissions from the main source sectors in 2018 of non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) (Source: Air quality in Europe - 2020 report; EEA Report, No 09/2020 [4])
Contribution to EU-28 area emissions from the main source sectors in 2018 of non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) (Source: Air quality in Europe - 2020 report; EEA Report, No 09/2020 [4])

Figure 2.

Model of Compact Trickle Bed Bioreactor (own study based on Kasperczyk et al. 2019 [39])
Model of Compact Trickle Bed Bioreactor (own study based on Kasperczyk et al. 2019 [39])

Figure 3.

Efficiency of biopurification of air from H2S (Figure source: Kasperczyk et al. 2019 [39])
Efficiency of biopurification of air from H2S (Figure source: Kasperczyk et al. 2019 [39])

Figure 4.

Efficiency of biopurification of air from VOC in pilot scale CTBB. (Figure source: Kasperczyk et al. 2019 [42])
Efficiency of biopurification of air from VOC in pilot scale CTBB. (Figure source: Kasperczyk et al. 2019 [42])

Figure 5.

Efficiency of biopurification of air from VOC in full scale CTBB. (Figure source: Kasperczyk et al. 2021 [42])
Efficiency of biopurification of air from VOC in full scale CTBB. (Figure source: Kasperczyk et al. 2021 [42])

Figure 6.

Compact Trickle Bed Bioreactor implemented on a full scale to remove VOC emitted from paint industry (Ekoinwentyka Ltd)
Compact Trickle Bed Bioreactor implemented on a full scale to remove VOC emitted from paint industry (Ekoinwentyka Ltd)

Advantages and disadvantages of biotrickling filters technology [2, 10, 13, 14]

Biotrickling filters
Advantages Disadvantages
Effective removal of pollutants Risk of bed blockage by excessively growing biomass increase in a pressure drop in gas phase due to clogging of the bed and the need to remove inhibitors formed as secondary process products
Process conditions: 25-30°C, atmospheric pressure Low efficiency in removing compounds insoluble in water
Low operating costs - no need for bed replacement and disposal, low energy consumption Inability to use this technology for non-biodegradable compounds
Very good process control ability
Ecological purity - no secondary pollutants
No risk of explosion

A review of recent work on the effectiveness of biodegradation in relation to packing material [29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]

References Pollution Packing material Degradation Effectiveness/Conclusions
Hernandez et al. 2013 [30] Ethylmercaptan, NH3 and H2S Poplar wood chips and polyurethane foam Both biotrickling filters achieved complete NH3 removal, and more than 90% degradation of H2S, ethylmercaptan reported lower performance in biotrickling filters packed with polyurethane foam. Polyurethane foam requires a longer time for the immobilization of microorganisms, poplar wood shows greater resistance in terms of NH3 elimination, the durability of poplar wood is 2 years and much more profitable compared to polyurethane foam.
Sun et al. 2019 [31] H2S from municipal wastewater treatment plant Polypropylene rings The average H2S removal efficiency was 91.8%
Chen et al. 2019 [32] H2S from sewage lift station Bamboo charcoal The average H2S removal efficiency was 99%
Huan et al. 2020 [33] NH3 and H2S Polyhedral spheres The average H2S removal efficiency was 98.25% and NH3 was 88.55%
Liu et al. 2020 [34] removal of odors (mainly H2S and NH3), from the sludge dewatering room in wastewater treatment plant. Polyurethane, Volcanic rock, modified activated carbon fiber Odor (mainly H2S and NH3) removal efficiency was 98,5%
Ying et al. 2020 [35] H2S and NH3 Porcelain Raschig rings and ceramsite The average H2S and NH3 removal efficiency was over 99%
Chen et al. 2016 [36] H2S Activated carbonloaded polyurethane (upper layer) and with modified organism-suspended fillers (lower layer) The average H2S removal efficiency was greater than 96%In addition, the biotrickling filter was able to withstand periods of contaminated starvation (1.5 days and 7 days) with several hours of recovery time
Lebrero et al. 2021 [29] H2S, methylmercaptan and toluene Conventional plastic packing material and new clay-based materials (Saint Gobain) The use of new fillings in the biotrickling filter has increased the efficiency and buffer capacity compared to plastic rings. Similar conclusions apply to biofilters, almost complete reduction of H2S and toluene and 80% methylmercaptan removals were investigated. Clay-based packing materials (Saint Gobain) were found to have high buffer capacity, high water retention and good gas-liquid mass transfer
Tu et al. 2019 [37] Mixed sulfur compounds Plastic balls in the upper layer and with lava rocks in the bottom layer Improvement in sulfur removal efficiency and a higher bed pH using the new packing combination compared to a lava rocks only packing.
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Architecture et design, Architecture, Architectes, bâtiments
RSS Feed de la revue