[
1. Adam, N.A. (2022). Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior and Change Management Phases in Government Institutions: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.3390/admsci12010028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Akbari, N., Samimi, S. (2021). A brief history of telecommunication and transmitting information in Afghanistan. Вестник КазНУ. Серия историческая, 102(3), 32-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.26577/JH.2021.v102.i3.04
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Al-Imarah, A.A., Shields, R. (2019). MOOCs, disruptive innovation and the future of higher education: A conceptual analysis. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), 258-269. [ Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1080/14703297.2018.1443828
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Askew, K. (2022). Bio-bean uses coffee to power buses in food waste fight. [online] foodnavigator.com. Available at: https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2017/11/20/Bio-bean-uses-coffee-to-power-buses-in-food-waste-fight>[Link]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Black, J.K. (2018). Development in theory and practice: paradigms and paradoxes. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.4324/9780429495311
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Brenner, B. (2018). Transformative sustainable business models in the light of the digital imperative − A global business economics perspective. Sustainability, 10(12), 4428. [Google Scholar ] [CrossRef ]10.3390/su10124428
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Chen, C.H. (2022). The mediating effect of corporate culture on the relationship between business model innovation and corporate social responsibility: A perspective from small-and medium-sized enterprises. Asia Pacific Management Review. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.01.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Christa, U., Kristinae, V. (2021). The effect of product innovation on business performance during COVID 19 pandemic. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(1), 151-158. [Google Scholar] G:\BEL\BEL\Issue 4, 2022\10.5267\j.uscm.2020.10.006 [CrossRef]10.5267/j.uscm.2020.10.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Chugh, R., and Ruhi, U. (2018). Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 605-616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/s10639-017-9621-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Dana, L.P., Salamzadeh, A., Mortazavi, S., & Hadizadeh, M. (2022). Investigating the impact of international markets and new digital technologies on business innovation in emerging markets. Sustainability, 14(2), 983. [ Google Scholar ] [CrossRef]10.3390/su14020983
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Demirel, P., and Kesidou, E. (2019). Sustainability-oriented capabilities for eco-innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 847-857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1002/bse.2286
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Fairphone.com. (2022). Reducing electronic waste | Fairphone. [online] Available at: [Link]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Feiner, L. (2021). Amazon details new warehouse robots, ‘Ernie’ and ‘Bert’. [online] CNBC.com. Available at: [Link]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Fernandez, D., and Aman, A. (2018). Impacts of robotic process automation on global accounting services. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 9(1), 127-140. [Google Scholar ] [CrossRef]10.17576/AJAG-2018-09-11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Flinders, K. (2021). Tech-enabled hybrid working enables HSBC to cut 40% of its global office space. [online] ComputerWeekly.com. Available at: [Link]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Girotra, K., & Netessine, S. (2013). OM forum − business model innovation for sustainability. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 15(4), 537-544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1287/msom.2013.0451
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Guttmann, A. (2021). Commons and cooperatives: A new governance of collective action. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 92(1), 33-53. [Google Scholar ] [CrossRef]10.1111/apce.12291
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Haenlein, M., Bitner, M.J., Kohli, A.K., Lemon, K.N., & Reibstein, D.J. (2021). Guest editorial: Responsible research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Ho, J.C. (2022). Disruptive innovation from the perspective of innovation diffusion theory. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(4), 363-376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1080/09537325.2021.1901873
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. InsideEVs. (2022). How Did Tesla Overcome ‘Chip Shortage’ While Rivals Struggled. [online] Available at: [Link]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Karami, R., Vaez, S.A., and Rekabdar, G. (2020). Innovation and creativity in separating the components of the tax gap and their impact on future earnings changes. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Science, 10(1), 135-160. [Google Scholar]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Kolodny, L. (2022). Tesla cut a steering component from some cars to deal with chip shortage, sources say. [online] CNBC.com. Available at: [Link]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Krstić, B., & Jovanović-Vujatović, M. (2022). Open innovation strategy as a determinant of sustainable enterprise competitiveness. Economics of Sustainable Development, 6(1), 25-34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.5937/ESD2201025K
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Liu, J.H., & Meng, Z. (2017). Innovation model analysis of new energy vehicles: taking Toyota, Tesla and BYD as an example. Procedia engineering, 174, 965-972. [Google Scholar ] [CrossRef]10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.248
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Lv, W.D., Tian, D., Wei, Y., and Xi, R.X. (2018). Innovation resilience: A new approach for managing uncertainties concerned with sustainable innovation. Sustainability, 10(10), 3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.3390/su10103641
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Markovic, S., Koporcic, N., Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, M., Kadic-Maglajlic, S., Bagherzadeh, M., and Islam, N. (2021). Business-to-business open innovation: COVID-19 lessons for small and medium-sized enterprises from emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120883
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Min, S., So, K.K.F., and Jeong, M. (2021). Consumer adoption of the Uber mobile application: Insights from diffusion of innovation theory and technology acceptance model. In Future of Tourism Marketing (pp. 2-15). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.4324/9781003176039-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Mostaghel, R., Oghazi, P., Parida, V., & Sohrabpour, V. (2022). Digitalization driven retail business model innovation: Evaluation of past and avenues for future research trends. Journal of Business Research, 146, 134-145. [Google Scholar ] [CrossRef]10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.072
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Parker, G.G. (2022). Business Model Innovation and the Rise of Technology Giants. Perspectives on Digital Humanism, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1007/978-3-030-86144-5_22
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Parks, S., Kuriansky, J., & Koch, P. (2022). Confronting the crisis of COVID-19: Evolution of a model for preservation of people and the planet. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 11(3), 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1027/2157-3891/a000053
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Pieroni, M.P., McAloone, T.C., and Pigosso, D.C. (2019). Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches. Journal of cleaner production, 215, 198-216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Rosenbaum, D., More, E., and Steane, P. (2018). Planned organisational change management: Forward to the past? An exploratory literature review. Journal of Organizational Change Management. [Google https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=32.%09Rosenbaum%2C+D.%2C+More%2C+E.%2C+and+Steane%2C+P.+%282018%29.+Planned+organisational+change+management%3A+Forward+to+the+past%3F+An+exploratory+literature+review.+Journal+of+Organizational+Change+Management&btnG=Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1108/JOCM-06-2015-0089
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Sileyew, K.J. (2019). Research design and methodology (pp. 1-12). Rijeka: IntechOpen. Available at: [Link]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Statista (2022a). Most sustainable companies globally 2021 | Statista. [online] Available at: [Link]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Statista (2022b). Topic: Digital transformation. [online] Available at: [Link]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Van Looy, A. (2021). A quantitative and qualitative study of the link between business process management and digital innovation. Information & Management, 58(2), 103413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1016/j.im.2020.103413
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Woo, E.J., & Kang, E. (2021). Employee environmental capability and its relationship with corporate culture. Sustainability, 13(16), 8684. [Google Scholar ] [CrossRef]10.3390/su13168684
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Yu, X., & Manthiram, A. (2021). Sustainable battery materials for next-generation electrical energy storage. Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research, 2(5), 2000102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.1002/aesr.202000102
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Yun, J.J., Zhao, X., Park, K., and Shi, L. (2020). Sustainability condition of open innovation: Dynamic growth of alibaba from SME to large enterprise. Sustainability, 12(11), 4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]10.3390/su12114379
]Search in Google Scholar
, 