Comparative analysis of preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labour in a Polish and German hospital

1 Sieroszewski P. Nieprawidłowy czas trwania ciąży. Ciąża przeterminowana. In: Bręborowicz GH, editor. Położnictwo. Medycyna matczynopłodowa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; 2012. p. 41-67. Search in Google Scholar

2 Pierce S, Bakker R, Myers D, Edwards RK. Clinical insights for cervical ripening and labor induction using prostaglandins. AJP Rep 2018;8(4):e307-14. Search in Google Scholar

3 Bakker R, Pierce S, Myers D. The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;296(2):167-79. Search in Google Scholar

4 Lapuente-Ocamica O, Ugarte L, Lopez-Picado A, Sanchez-Refoyo F, Lasa IL, Echevarria O, et al. Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19(1):14. Search in Google Scholar

5 Stephenson ML, Hawkins JS, Powers BL, Wing DA. Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a delivery system with accurate dosing and rapid discontinuation. Womens Health (Lond) 2014;10(1):29-36. Search in Google Scholar

6 Li Y, He Z, Song L, Zhang J, Wang J, Cheng J. Foley catheter ballon versus prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2016;9(4):7573-84. Search in Google Scholar

7 Bomba-Opoń D, Drews K, Huras H, Laudański P, Paszkowski T, Wielgoś M. Rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego dotyczące indukcji porodu. Ginekologia Perinatologia Prakt 2017;2(2):58-71. Search in Google Scholar

8 Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, et al. Postterm pregnancy. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, et al., editors. Williams obstetrics. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018. p. 1-16. Search in Google Scholar

9 Conde A, Ben S, Tarigo J, Artucio S, Varela V, Grimaldi P, et al. Comparison between vaginal and sublingual misoprostol 50 μg for cervical ripening prior to induction of labor: randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;295(4):839-44. Search in Google Scholar

10 Marsdal KE, Sørbye IK, Gaudernack LC, Lukasse M. A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18(1):11. Search in Google Scholar

11 Dorr ML, Pierson RC, Daggy J, Quinney SK, Haas DM. Buccal versus vaginal misoprostol for term induction of labor: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Perinatol 2019;36(7):765-72. Search in Google Scholar

12 Morris M, Bolnga JW, Verave O, Aipit J, Rero A, Laman M. Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17(1):298. Search in Google Scholar

13 Bolla D, Weissleder SV, Radan AP, Gasparri ML, Raio L, Müller M, et al. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18(1);149. Search in Google Scholar

14 Abdel-Aal NK, Saad AS, Abdel-Haleem WY. Oxytocin versus sublingual misoprostol for induction of labour in term prelabour rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. J Evidence Based Women’s Health 2020;10(4):291-7. Search in Google Scholar

15 Swarnkar KS, Chunjian Y, Rajiv D, Sohan D, Rekma D, Pandey SR. Efficacy and safety uses of misoprostol for induction of labour at term. In-tern J Sci Inventions Today 2018;7(2):211-21. Search in Google Scholar

16 Jasim SA, Mahdi WA, Hameed BH. Use of intravenous oxytocin infusion versus misoprostol for induction of delivery in cases of PROM at term. IJRMST 2020;10:95-100. Search in Google Scholar

17 Hokkila E, Kruit H, Rahkonen L, Timonen S, Mattila M, Laatio L, et al. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral miso-prostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019;98(8):1032-9. Search in Google Scholar

18 Wallstrom T, Jarnbert-Pettersson H, Stenson D, Akerud H, Darj E, Gemzell-Danielsson K, et al. Labor induction with orally administrated misoprostol: a retrospective cohort study. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:6840592. Search in Google Scholar

19 Jenkins A, Coumary SA, Ghose S. Comparison of the efficacy of extra amniotic Foley catheter, intravaginal prostaglandin E1 tablet and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for pre induction cervical ripening: a randomized comparative study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2016;5(11):3902-8. Search in Google Scholar

20 Pimentel VM, Arabkhazaeli M, Moon JY, Wang A, Kapedani A, Bernstein PS, et al. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218(6):614.e1-8. Search in Google Scholar

21 Bręborowicz GH, Dubiel M, Markwitz W, Ropacka M, Spaczyński M. Ocena stanu płodu w czasie ciąży i porodu. In: Bręborowicz GH, editor. Położnictwo. Podręcznik dla położnych i pielęgniarek. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; 2011. p. 431-4. Search in Google Scholar

22 Janiec W, Trzeciak HI, Folwarczna J. Leki wpływające na czynność skurczową macicy w okresie porodu. In: Janiec W, editor. Kompendium farmakologii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; 2015. p. 162-3. Search in Google Scholar

23 Helmig RB, Hvidman LE. An audit of oral administration of Angusta^® (misoprostol) 25 μg for induction of labor in 976 consecutive women with a singleton pregnancy in a university hospital in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020;99(10):1396-402. Search in Google Scholar

24 Draycott T, van der Nelson H, Montouchet C, Ruff L, Andersson F. Reduction in resource use with the misoprostol vaginal insert vs the dinoprostone vaginal insert for labour induction: a model-based analysis from a United Kingdom healthcare perspective. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:49. Search in Google Scholar

25 Sharp A, Faluyi D, Alfirevic Z. Misoprostol vaginal insert (Mysodelle) versus Dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin) for induction of labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019;240:41-4. Search in Google Scholar

26 Kehl S, Weiss C, Dammer U, Raabe E, Burghaus S, Heimrich J, et al. Induction of labour: change of method and its effects. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015;75(3):238-43. Search in Google Scholar

27 Young DC, Delaney T, Armson BA, Fanning C. Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2020;15(1):e0227245. Search in Google Scholar

28 Hauwa SU, Shittu SO, Umar-Sulayman H, Audu BM. A comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term, at the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2019;36(2):189-95. Search in Google Scholar

29 Górnisiewicz T, Jaworowski A, Zembala-Szczerba M, Babczyk D, Huras H. Analysis of intravaginal misoprostol 0.2 mg versus intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg doses for labor induction at term pregnancies. Ginekol Pol 2017;88(6):320-4. Search in Google Scholar

30 Levine LD. Cervical ripening: Why we do what we do. Semin Perinatol 2020;44(2):151216. Search in Google Scholar

31 Levine LD, Valencia CM, Tolosa JE. Induction of labor in continuing pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2020;67:90-9. Search in Google Scholar

32 Solone M, Shaw KA. Induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2020;32(2):107-12. Search in Google Scholar

33 Blanc-Petitjean P, Carbonne B, Deneux-Tharaux C, Salomé M, Goffinet F, Ray CL. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: a population-based study using coarsened exact matching. Paediatr Perinatal Epidemiol 2019;33(5):313-22. Search in Google Scholar

34 Sharada K, Warrier H, Reddy AK, Thulasi P. Misoprostol and Oxytocin in induction of labor. Intern Arch Integrated Med 2018;5(3):97-105. Search in Google Scholar

35 Bhatu JJ, Chaudhari AB, Chauhan NR. Oxytocin versus Misoprostol used as an induction of labour in term in early rupture of Amniotic membranes. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2020;9(3):1023-8. Search in Google Scholar

36 Ulan A, Ulan J, Wagner E, Sadowska M. Indukcja porodu. Eur J Med Technol 2015;2(7):16-9. Search in Google Scholar

37 Sajjad N, Ali S, Hassan S, Rasheed T. Determine the outcome of labour induction and compare the results between misoprostol and oxyto-cin in post-date pregnancy. J Med Health Studies 2020;14(1):35-7. Search in Google Scholar

38 Bell AF, Erickson EN, Carter CS. Beyond labor: the role of natural and synthetic oxytocin in the transition to motherhood. J Midwifery Womens Health 2014;59(1):35-42. Search in Google Scholar

39 Acharya T, Devkota R, Bhattarai B, Acharya R. Outcome of misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour. SAGE Open Med 2017;5:2050312117700809 Search in Google Scholar

40 Braunthal S, Brateanu A. Hypertension in pregnancy: pathophysiology and treatment. SAGE Open Med 2019;7:2050312119843700. Search in Google Scholar

41 Fareed P, Mahajan N, Farhana S. Comparison of the efficacy of intracervical foley’s catheter balloon with PGE2 gel in pre-induction cervical ripening. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2016;5(2):371-4. Search in Google Scholar

42 Schmidt M, Neophytou M, Hars O, Freudenberg J, Kühnert M. Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019;299(1):105-12. Search in Google Scholar

43 Kashanian M, Eshraghi N, Rahimi M, Sheikhansari N, Javanmanesh F. Efficacy comparison of titrated oral solution of misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin on labour induction in women with full-term pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2020;40(1):20-4. Search in Google Scholar

44 Pourali L, Saghafi N, Eslami Hasan Abadi S, Tara F, Vatanchi AM, Motamedi E. Induction of labour in term premature rupture of membranes; oxytocin versus sublingual misoprostol; a randomised clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;38(2):167-71. Search in Google Scholar

45 Nair PP, Jungari ML, Tiwari MR, Butola LK. Study of induction of labour with oral misoprostol and its maternal and perinatal outcome. Int J Cur Res Rev 2020;12(14):77-81. Search in Google Scholar