Role of intrapartum ultrasound in modern obstetrics – current perspectives and literature review

1. Hobbins JC: Overview of imaging in pregnancy: history to the present, including economic impact. Semin Perinatol 2013; 5: 290–291. Hobbins JC : Overview of imaging in pregnancy: history to the present, including economic impact . Semin Perinatol 2013 ; 5 : 290 – 291 . 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.06.002 Search in Google Scholar

2. Goldberg BG: Obstetric US Imaging: The Past 40 Years, Radiology 2000; 215: 622–629. Goldberg BG : Obstetric US Imaging: The Past 40 Years , Radiology 2000 ; 215 : 622 – 629 . 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn40622 Search in Google Scholar

3. Dębska M, Kretowicz P, Dębski R: Intrapartum sonography – eccentricity or necessity? J Ultrason 2015; 15: 125–136. Dębska M Kretowicz P Dębski R : Intrapartum sonography – eccentricity or necessity? J Ultrason 2015 ; 15 : 125 – 136 . 10.15557/JoU.2015.0011 Search in Google Scholar

4. Phelps JY, Higby H, Smyth MH, Ward JA, Arredondo F, Mayer AR: Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 3: 942–945. Phelps JY Higby H Smyth MH Ward JA Arredondo F Mayer AR : Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements . Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995 ; 3 : 942 – 945 . 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90371-2 Search in Google Scholar

5. Huhn KA, Brost BC: Accuracy of simulated cervical dilation and effacement measurements among practitioners. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 5: 1797–1799. Huhn KA Brost BC : Accuracy of simulated cervical dilation and effacement measurements among practitioners . Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004 ; 5 : 1797 – 1799 . 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.06215547567 Search in Google Scholar

6. Buchmann EJ, Libhaber E: Accuracy of cervical assessment in the active phase of labour. BJOG 2007; 114: 833–837. Buchmann EJ Libhaber E : Accuracy of cervical assessment in the active phase of labour . BJOG 2007 ; 114 : 833 – 837 . 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01386.x17567418 Search in Google Scholar

7. Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M et al.: Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 3: 868–874. Dupuis O Silveira R Zentner A Dittmar A Gaucherand P Cucherat M et al. : Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification . Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 ; 3 : 868 – 874 . 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.02815746684 Search in Google Scholar

8. Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O: Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 264–268. Sherer DM Miodovnik M Bradley KS Langer O : Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002 ; 19 : 264 – 268 . 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x11896948 Search in Google Scholar

9. Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O: Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19: 258–263. Sherer DM Miodovnik M Bradley KS Langer O : Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002 ; 19 : 258 – 263 . 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00641.x11896947 Search in Google Scholar

10. Souka AP, Haritos T, Basayiannis K, Noikokyri N, Antsaklis A: Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 13: 59–63. Souka AP Haritos T Basayiannis K Noikokyri N Antsaklis A : Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor . J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003 ; 13 : 59 – 63 . 10.1080/jmf.13.1.59.6312710859 Search in Google Scholar

11. Shetty J, Aahir V, Pandey D, Adiga P, Kamath A: Fetal head position during the first stage of labor: comparison between vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasound. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2014, 314617. Shetty J Aahir V Pandey D Adiga P Kamath A : Fetal head position during the first stage of labor: comparison between vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasound . ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2014 , 314617 . 10.1155/2014/314617407677325006479 Search in Google Scholar

12. Dimassi K, Ben Amor A, Belghith C, Ben Khedija MA, Triki A, Gara MF: Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal head engagement. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 127: 6–9. Dimassi K Ben Amor A Belghith C Ben Khedija MA Triki A Gara MF : Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal head engagement . Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014 ; 127 : 6 – 9 . 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.04.00824934705 Search in Google Scholar

13. Ghi T, Eggebø T, Lees C, Kalache K, Rozenberg P, Youssef A et al.: IS-UOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 128–139. Ghi T Eggebø T Lees C Kalache K Rozenberg P Youssef A et al. : IS-UOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018 ; 52 : 128 – 139 . 10.1002/uog.1907229974596 Search in Google Scholar

14. Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC: A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 313–319. Barbera AF Pombar X Perugino G Lezotte DC Hobbins JC : A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 ; 33 : 313 – 319 . 10.1002/uog.632919248000 Search in Google Scholar

15. Eggebø TM, Heien C, Økland I, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA: Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 199–204. Eggebø TM Heien C Økland I Gjessing LK Romundstad P Salvesen KA : Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008 ; 32 : 199 – 204 . 10.1002/uog.536018528923 Search in Google Scholar

16. Molina FS, Terra R, Carrillo MP, Puertas A, Nicolaides KH: What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 493–499. Molina FS Terra R Carrillo MP Puertas A Nicolaides KH : What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010 ; 36 : 493 – 499 . 10.1002/uog.770920533441 Search in Google Scholar

17. Dückelmann AM, Bamberg C, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Nonnenmacher A, Dudenhausen JW et al.: Measurement of fetal head descent using the ‘angle of progression’ on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 216–222. Dückelmann AM Bamberg C Michaelis SA Lange J Nonnenmacher A Dudenhausen JW et al. : Measurement of fetal head descent using the ‘angle of progression’ on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010 ; 35 : 216 – 222 . 10.1002/uog.752120069668 Search in Google Scholar

18. Tutschek B, Braun T, Chantraine F, Henrich W: A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent. BJOG 2011; 118: 62–69. Tutschek B Braun T Chantraine F Henrich W : A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent . BJOG 2011 ; 118 : 62 – 69 . 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02775.x21083864 Search in Google Scholar

19. Eggebø TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, Smedvig E, Økland I, Romundstad P et al.: Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 387–391. Eggebø TM Gjessing LK Heien C Smedvig E Økland I Romundstad P et al. : Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006 ; 27 : 387 – 391 . 10.1002/uog.274416565994 Search in Google Scholar

20. Kalache KD, Dückelmann AM, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Cichon G, Dudenhausen JW: Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the ‘angle of progression’ predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 326–330. Kalache KD Dückelmann AM Michaelis SA Lange J Cichon G Dudenhausen JW : Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the ‘angle of progression’ predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 ; 33 : 326 – 330 . 10.1002/uog.629419224527 Search in Google Scholar

21. Nishimura K, Yoshimura K, Kubo T, Hachisuga T: Objective diagnosis of arrested labor on transperineal ultrasound. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2016; 42: 803–809. Nishimura K Yoshimura K Kubo T Hachisuga T : Objective diagnosis of arrested labor on transperineal ultrasound . J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2016 ; 42 : 803 – 809 . 10.1111/jog.1296727074875 Search in Google Scholar

22. Eggebø TM, Hassan WA, Salvesen KÅ, Lindtjørn E, Lees CC: Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 195–201. Eggebø TM Hassan WA Salvesen KÅ Lindtjørn E Lees CC : Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014 ; 43 : 195 – 201 . 10.1002/uog.1321024105705 Search in Google Scholar

23. Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G: Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 331–336. Ghi T Farina A Pedrazzi A Rizzo N Pelusi G Pilu G : Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 ; 33 : 331 – 336 . 10.1002/uog.631319202576 Search in Google Scholar

24. Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, Kämena A, Tutschek B: Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 753–760. Henrich W Dudenhausen J Fuchs I Kämena A Tutschek B : Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006 ; 28 : 753 – 760 . 10.1002/uog.384817063455 Search in Google Scholar

25. Sainz JA, Borrero C, Aquise A, Serrano R, Gutiérrez L, Fernández–Palacín A: Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29: 1348–1352. Sainz JA Borrero C Aquise A Serrano R Gutiérrez L Fernández–Palacín A : Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery . J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016 ; 29 : 1348 – 1352 . 10.3109/14767058.2015.104868026037726 Search in Google Scholar

26. Dall’Asta A, Angeli L, Masturzo B, Volpe N, Luca Schera GB, Di Pasquo E et al.: Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; pii: S0002-9378(19)31211-6. Dall’Asta A Angeli L Masturzo B Volpe N Luca Schera GB Di Pasquo E et al. : Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound . Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019 ; p ii : S0002-9378(19)31211-6 . Search in Google Scholar

27. Chan VYT, Lau WL, So MKP, Leung WC: Measuring angle of progression by transperineal ultrasonography to predict successful instrumental and cesarean deliveries during prolonged second stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019; 144: 192–198. Chan VYT Lau WL So MKP Leung WC : Measuring angle of progression by transperineal ultrasonography to predict successful instrumental and cesarean deliveries during prolonged second stage of labor . Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019 ; 144 : 192 – 198 . 10.1002/ijgo.1271230430566 Search in Google Scholar

28. Sainz JA, García-Mejido JA, Aquise A, Borrero C, Bonomi MJ, Fernández-Palacín A: A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220: 193.e1–193.e12. Sainz JA García-Mejido JA Aquise A Borrero C Bonomi MJ Fernández-Palacín A : A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps . Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019 ; 220 : 193.e1 – 193.e12 . 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.03530391443 Search in Google Scholar

29. Kahrs BH, Usman S, Ghi T, Youssef A, Torkildsen EA, Lindtjørn E et al.: Descent of fetal head during active pushing: secondary analysis of prospective cohort study investigating ultrasound examination before operative vaginal delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54: 524–529. Kahrs BH Usman S Ghi T Youssef A Torkildsen EA Lindtjørn E et al. : Descent of fetal head during active pushing: secondary analysis of prospective cohort study investigating ultrasound examination before operative vaginal delivery . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019 ; 54 : 524 – 529 . 10.1002/uog.2034831115115 Search in Google Scholar

30. Chan WWY, Chaemsaithong P, Lim WT, Tse AWT, Kwan AHW, Leung TY et al.: Pre-induction transperineal ultrasound assessment for the prediction of labor outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2019; 45: 256–267. Chan WWY Chaemsaithong P Lim WT Tse AWT Kwan AHW Leung TY et al. : Pre-induction transperineal ultrasound assessment for the prediction of labor outcome . Fetal Diagn Ther 2019 ; 45 : 256 – 267 . 10.1159/00048912230121653 Search in Google Scholar

31. Ali J, Hebbar S: Ultrasound assessment of foetal head-perineum distance prior to induction of labour as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2019; 69: 129–135. Ali J Hebbar S : Ultrasound assessment of foetal head-perineum distance prior to induction of labour as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery . J Obstet Gynaecol India 2019 ; 69 : 129 – 135 . 10.1007/s13224-018-1120-x643026330956466 Search in Google Scholar

32. Tse WT, Chaemsaithong P, Chan WWY, Kwan AHW, Huang J, Appiah K et al.: Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221: 335.e1–335.e18. Tse WT Chaemsaithong P Chan WWY Kwan AHW Huang J Appiah K et al. : Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor . Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019 ; 221 : 335.e1 – 335.e18 . 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.04031153931 Search in Google Scholar

33. Youssef A, Dodaro MG, Montaguti E, Consolini S, Ciarlariello S, Farina A et al.: Dynamic changes of fetal head descent at term before the onset of labor correlate with labor outcome and can be improved by ultrasound visual feedback. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 8: 1–8. Youssef A Dodaro MG Montaguti E Consolini S Ciarlariello S Farina A et al. : Dynamic changes of fetal head descent at term before the onset of labor correlate with labor outcome and can be improved by ultrasound visual feedback . J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019 ; 8 : 1 – 8 . Search in Google Scholar

34. Cuerva MJ, García–Casarrubios P, García–Calvo L, Gutiérrez-Simon M, Ordás P, Magdaleno F et al.: Use of intrapartum ultrasound in term pregnant women with contractions before hospital admission. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98: 162–166. Cuerva MJ García–Casarrubios P García–Calvo L Gutiérrez-Simon M Ordás P Magdaleno F et al. : Use of intrapartum ultrasound in term pregnant women with contractions before hospital admission . Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019 ; 98 : 162 – 166 . 10.1111/aogs.1347430288731 Search in Google Scholar

35. Mohan A, Mittal P, Bharti R, Grover SB, Suri J, Mohan U: Assessment of labor progression by intrapartum ultrasonography among term nulliparous women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019; 147: 78–82. Mohan A Mittal P Bharti R Grover SB Suri J Mohan U : Assessment of labor progression by intrapartum ultrasonography among term nulliparous women . Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019 ; 147 : 78 – 82 . 10.1002/ijgo.1290631283005 Search in Google Scholar

36. Youssef A, Kamel R: Ultrasound in labor: impact of a theoretical and practical course on caregiver’s perspective and accuracy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 30: 1–7. Youssef A Kamel R : Ultrasound in labor: impact of a theoretical and practical course on caregiver’s perspective and accuracy . J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019 ; 30 : 1 – 7 . Search in Google Scholar

37. Sainz JA, Fernández-Palacín A, Borrero C, Aquise A, Ramos Z, García-Mejido JA: Intra and interobserver variability of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurements with contraction and pushing. J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 38: 333–338. Sainz JA Fernández-Palacín A Borrero C Aquise A Ramos Z García-Mejido JA : Intra and interobserver variability of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurements with contraction and pushing . J Obstet Gynaecol 2018 ; 38 : 333 – 338 . 10.1080/01443615.2017.135417929022481 Search in Google Scholar

38. Rozenberg P, Porcher R, Salomon LJ, Boirot F, Morin C, Ville Y: Comparison of the learning curves of digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 332–337. Rozenberg P Porcher R Salomon LJ Boirot F Morin C Ville Y : Comparison of the learning curves of digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor . Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008 ; 31 : 332 – 337 . 10.1002/uog.526718307213 Search in Google Scholar

39. Chan YT, Ng KS, Yung WK, Lo TK, Lau WL, Leung WC: Is intrapartum translabial ultrasound examination painless? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29: 3276–3280. Chan YT Ng KS Yung WK Lo TK Lau WL Leung WC : Is intrapartum translabial ultrasound examination painless? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016 ; 29 : 3276 – 3280 . 10.3109/14767058.2015.112324126699380 Search in Google Scholar

40. Usman S, Barton H, Wilhelm–Benartzi C, Lees CC: Ultrasound is better tolerated than vaginal examination in and before labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 59: 362–366. Usman S Barton H Wilhelm–Benartzi C Lees CC : Ultrasound is better tolerated than vaginal examination in and before labour . Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2019 ; 59 : 362 – 366 . 10.1111/ajo.1286430024022 Search in Google Scholar

41. Iliescu DG, Tudorache S, Cara ML, Dragusin R, Carbunaru O, Florea M et al.: Acceptability of intrapartum ultrasound monitoring – experience from a Romanian Longitudinal Study. Curr Health Sci J 2015; 41: 355–360. Iliescu DG Tudorache S Cara ML Dragusin R Carbunaru O Florea M et al. : Acceptability of intrapartum ultrasound monitoring – experience from a Romanian Longitudinal Study . Curr Health Sci J 2015 ; 41 : 355 – 360 . Search in Google Scholar

42. Malvasi A, Montanari Vergallo G, Tinelli A, Marinelli E: „Can the intrapartum ultrasonography reduce the legal liability in distocic labor and delivery?” J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31: 1108–1109. Malvasi A Montanari Vergallo G Tinelli A Marinelli E : „Can the intrapartum ultrasonography reduce the legal liability in distocic labor and delivery?” J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018 ; 31 : 1108 – 1109 . 10.1080/14767058.2017.130651428367648 Search in Google Scholar