New aspects in shear-wave elastography of prostate cancer

1. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes: Zentrum für Krebsregister- daten: Krebs in Deutschland 2009/2010 [German Federal Health Report, Cancer Data Registry 2009–2010], ed. 9. Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin 2013: 16 (Fig. 3.0.1). Search in Google Scholar

2. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes: Zentrum für Krebsregister- daten: Krebs in Deutschland 2009/2010 [German Federal Health Report, Cancer Data Registry 2009–2010], ed. 9. Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin 2013: 17 (Fig. 3.0.2). Search in Google Scholar

3. Ilic D, Neuberger MM, Djulbegovic M, Dahm P: Screening for prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 1: CD004720.10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3840691523440794 Search in Google Scholar

4. Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A et al.: Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. EurUrol 2015; pii: S0302–2838(15)00036–6. Search in Google Scholar

5. Uemura H, Sano F, Nomiya A, Yamamoto T, Nakamura M, Miki K et al.: Usefulness of perflubutanemicrobubble-enhanced ultrasound in imaging and detection of prostate cancer: phase II multicenter clinical trial. World J Urol 2013; 31: 1123–1128.10.1007/s00345-012-0833-122311543 Search in Google Scholar

6. Loch T: Computerized supported transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urologe A 2004; 43: 1377–1384.10.1007/s00120-004-0710-715517143 Search in Google Scholar

7. Braeckman J, Autier P, Garbar C, Marichal MP, Soviany C, Nir R et al.: Computer-aided ultrasonography (HistoScanning): a novel technology for locating and characterizing prostate cancer. BJU Int 2008; 101: 293–298.10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07232.x17922870 Search in Google Scholar

8. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ: Cancer screening in the United States 2007: a review of current guidelines, practices, and prospects. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 90–104.10.3322/canjclin.57.2.9017392386 Search in Google Scholar

9. Mottet N, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, van Casteren NJ et al.: Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. European Association of Urology 2014. Search in Google Scholar

10. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ornstein DK: Prostate cancer detection in men with serum PSA concentrations of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL and benign prostate examination. Enhancement of specificity with free PSA measurements. JAMA 1997; 277: 1452–1455.10.1001/jama.1997.03540420048028 Search in Google Scholar

11. Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X: Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991; 13: 111–134.10.1177/0161734691013002011858217 Search in Google Scholar

12. Woo S, Kim SY, Lee MS, Cho JY, Kim SH: Shear wave elastography assessment in the prostate: an intraobserver reproducibility study. Clin Imaging 2014; pii: S0899–7071(14)00281-2. doi: 10.1016/j.clin- imag.2014.11.013. [Epub ahead of print] Search in Google Scholar

13. Mitri FG, Urban MW, Fatemi M, Greenleaf JF: Shear wave dispersion ultrasonic vibrometry for measuring prostate shear stiffness and viscosity: an in vitro pilot study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011; 58: 235–242.10.1109/TBME.2010.2053928315728820595086 Search in Google Scholar

14. Barr RG, Memo R, Schaub CR: Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results. Ultrasound Q 2012; 28: 13–20.10.1097/RUQ.0b013e318249f59422357224 Search in Google Scholar

15. Ahmad S, Cao R, Varghese T, Bidaut L, Nabi G: Transrectal quantitative shear wave elastography in the detection and characterisation of prostate cancer. SurgEndosc 2013; 27: 3280–3287.10.1007/s00464-013-2906-723525883 Search in Google Scholar

16. Correas JM, Tissier AM, Khairoune A, Vassiliu V, Méjean A, Hélé- non O et al.: Prostate cancer: diagnostic performance of real-time shearwaveelastography. Radiology 2014; 19: 140567. [Epub ahead of print] Search in Google Scholar

17. Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparén P, Norlén BJ, Busch C: The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 1997; 50: 562–566.10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00306-3 Search in Google Scholar

18. Presti JC Jr, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, Shinohara K: The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 2000; 163: 163–166.10.1097/00005392-200001000-00038 Search in Google Scholar

19. Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey LB 2nd, Svensson WE, Balleyguier C, Smith C: Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 281–287.10.7863/jum.2012.31.2.28122298872 Search in Google Scholar

20. Zheng XZ, Ji P, Mao HW, Zhang XY, Xia EH, Xing-Gu: A novel approach to assessing changes in prostate stiffness with age using virtual touch tissue quantification. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 387–390.10.7863/jum.2011.30.3.38721357561 Search in Google Scholar

21. Massmann J, Funk A, Altwein J, Praetorius M: Prostate carcinoma (PC) – an organ-related speci fi c pathological neoplasm. Radiologe 2003; 43: 423–431.10.1007/s00117-003-0904-912827256Search in Google Scholar