A database of semantic features for chosen concepts (Attested in 8- to 10-year-old Czech pupils)

AHLGREN, P., JARNEVING, B. and ROUSSEAU, R., 2003. Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 550-560.10.1002/asi.10242Search in Google Scholar

ALDRICH, J., 1995. Correlations genuine and spurious in Pearson and Yule. Statistical Science, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 364-376. doi:10.1214/ss/1177009870.Search in Google Scholar

BARBAROTTO, R., LAIACONA, M. and CAPITANI, E., 2008. Does sex influence the age of acquisition of common names? A contrast of different semantic categories. Cortex, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1161-1170.10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.016Search in Google Scholar

BARSALOU, L. W., YEH, W., LUKA, B. J., OLSETH, K. L., MIX K. S. and WU, L., 1993. Concepts and meaning. barsaloulab.org [Accessed 20 March 2017]. Available at: http://barsaloulab.org/Online_Articles/1993-Barsalou_et_al-chap-concepts_meaning.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

BLOOM, P., 2000. How children learn the meanings of words. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3577.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

CAREY, S., 2009. The origin of concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367638.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

CREE, G. S. and McRAE, K., 2003. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 163-201.10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.163Search in Google Scholar

ČERVENÁ, V. et. al, 2005. Slovník spisovné češtiny pro školu a veřejnost. Praha: Academia.Search in Google Scholar

EGGHE, L. and LEYDESDORFF, L., 2009. The relation between Pearson’s correlation coefficient r and Salton’s cosine measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1027-1036.10.1002/asi.21009Search in Google Scholar

EPSKAMP, S., CRAMER, A. O. J., WALDORP, L. J., SCHMITTMANN, V. D. and BORSBOOM, D., 2012. qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1-18.10.18637/jss.v048.i04Search in Google Scholar

GEERAERTS, D., 2010. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198700302.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

KEIL, F. C., 1989. Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

KONEČNÁ, K. and VEČEŘOVÁ, L., 2016. Baterie sémantických rysů: data získaná od dětí z třetích tříd základních škol - zpráva z pilotního sběru dat. Studie z aplikované lingvistiky, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 48-71.Search in Google Scholar

LAKOFF, G., 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

McRAE, K., CREE, G. S., SEIDENBERG, M. S. and McNORGAN, C., 2005. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and non-living things. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 547-559.10.3758/BF03192726Search in Google Scholar

McRAE, K., de SA, V. R. and SEIDENBERG, M. S., 1997. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 99-130.10.1037/0096-3445.126.2.99Search in Google Scholar

MEDIN, D. L., 1989. Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1469-1481.10.1037/0003-066X.44.12.1469Search in Google Scholar

MURPHY, G. L., 2002. The big book of concepts. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

NAGY, M., 2014. Produkce sémantických rysů u dospělých mluvčích. In: J. Keseelová, M. Imrichová, M. Ološtiak, eds. Registre jazyka a jazykovedy (I). Prešov: Filozofická fakulta Prešovskej university v Prešove, pp. 237-249.Search in Google Scholar

POSNANSKY, C. J., 1978. Category norms for verbal items in 25 categories for children in grades 2-6. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 819-832.10.3758/BF03205407Search in Google Scholar

PRŮCHA, J., 2011. Dětská řeč a komunikace : poznatky vývojové psycholingvistiky. Praha: Grada Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

ROSCH, E. and MERVIS, C. B., 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive psychology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 573-605.10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9Search in Google Scholar

ROSCH, E. and LLOYD, B. B., 1978. Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

SALTON, G. and McGILL, M. J., 1983. Introduction to modern information retrieval. Auckland, etc.: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

VÁGNEROVÁ, M., 2001. Kognitivní a sociální psychologie žáka základní školy. Praha: Karolinum.Search in Google Scholar

VINSON, D. P. and VIGLIOCCO, G., 2008. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events. Behavior Research Methods, vol. 40, no. 1 (psychology module), pp. 183-190. The database is available at: http://www.childrenfeatures.webnode.cz10.3758/BRM.40.1.183Search in Google Scholar