[Abramczuk, K. (2003). Mechanizmy kontroli społecznej z perspektywy teorii gier (Unpublished master’s thesis). Instytut Socjologii, Uniwersytet Warszawski. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Abreu, D., Pearce, D., & Stacchetti, E. (1990). Toward a theory of discounted repeated games with imperfect monitoring. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 58 (5), 1041-1063. 10.2307/2938299]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Alexander, R. D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Aumann, R. J. (1959). Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games (AM-40), 4, 287. 10.1515/9781400882168-018]Search in Google Scholar
[Awaya, Y. (2014). Private monitoring and communication in repeated prisoners’ dilemma (Tech. Rep.). Working Paper, Penn State University, http://www.personal.psu.edu/yxa120/research.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390-1396.10.1126/science.7466396]Search in Google Scholar
[Axelrod, R. M. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bendor, J., & Swistak, P. (1998). Evolutionary equilibria: Characterization theorems and their implications. Theory and decision, 45(2), 99-159. 10.1023/A:1005083323183]Search in Google Scholar
[Bendor, J., & Swistak, P. (2000). The impossibility of pure homo economicus. In Annual meeting of the american political science association. Marriott Wardman Park. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Bendor, J., & Swistak, P. (2001). The evolution of norms. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1493-1545. 10.1086/321298]Search in Google Scholar
[Ben-Porath, E., & Kahneman, M. (1996). Communication in repeated games with private monitoring. Journal of Economic Theory, 70(2), 281-297. 10.1006/jeth.1996.0090]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyd, R., & Lorberbaum, J. P. (1987). No pure strategy is evolutionarily stable in the repeated prisoner’s dilemma game. Nature, 327, 58-59. 10.1038/327058a0]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1992). Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and sociobiology, 13(3), 171-195. 10.1016/0162-3095(92)90032-Y]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. CambridgeMass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Compte, O. (1998). Communication in repeated games with imperfect private monitoring. Econometrica, 66(3), 597-626. 10.2307/2998576]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & G¨achter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity. Human Nature, 13, 1-25. Fudenberg, D., & Maskin, E. (1986). The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 54(3), 533-554.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gintis, H. (2000). Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206(2), 169-179. 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2111]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamilton, W. D. (1964). Genetical evolution of social behavior i, ii. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1-52. 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (2001). Why people punish defectors: Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208(1), 79-89. 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2202]Search in Google Scholar
[Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U., & the ABC Research Group (Eds.). (2013). Simple heuristics in a social world. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. Harcourt: Brace and Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioural economics. The American economic review, 93(5), 1449-1475. 10.1257/000282803322655392]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kandori, M. (1992). Social norms and community enforcement. The Review of Economic Studies, 59(1), 63-80. 10.2307/2297925]Search in Google Scholar
[Kandori, M. (2002). Introduction to repeated games with private monitoring. Journal of Economic Theory, 102(1), 1-15. 10.1006/jeth.2001.2853]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kandori, M., & Matsushima, H. (1998). Private observation, communication and collusion. Econometrica, 66(3), 627-652. 10.2307/2998577]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Leimar, O., & Hammerstein, P. (2001). volution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 268, 745-753. 10.1098/rspb.2000.1573]Search in Google Scholar
[McLean, R., Obara, I., & Postlewaite, A. (2014). Robustness of public equilibria in repeated games with private monitoring. Journal of Economic Theory, 153, 191-212. 10.1016/j.jet.2014.06.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press. Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393, 573-577. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Obłoj, J. (2004). Normy społeczne i kontrola zachowań w ujęciu dedukcyjnym (Unpublished master’s thesis). Instytut Socjologii, Uniwersytet Warszawski. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Okuno-Fujiwara, M., & Postlewaite, A. (1995). Social norms and random matching games. Games and Economic behavior, 9(1), 79-109.10.1006/game.1995.1006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Riolo, R. L., Cohen, M. D., & Axelrod, R. (2001). Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity. Nature, 414(22), 441-443. 10.1038/35106555]Search in Google Scholar
[Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others - the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Sudgen, R. (1985). Review of the economics of conformism. Economic Journal, 95, 502-504. 10.2307/2233234]Search in Google Scholar
[Sugaya, T., & Wolitzky, A. (in press). Bounding equilibrium payoffs in repeated games with private monitoring. Theoretical Economics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.10.1086/406755]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar