[Abusch, Dorit (1994), The Scope of Indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 2. 83–135.10.1007/BF01250400]Search in Google Scholar
[Barwise, Jon & Robin Cooper (1981), Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics & Philosophy 4. 159-219.10.1007/BF00350139]Search in Google Scholar
[Bekki, Daisuke (2014). Representing anaphora with dependent types. In Asher, N., Soloviev, S. (eds.) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8535, Springer. 14–29.10.1007/978-3-662-43742-1_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Brasoveanu, Adrian (2008), Donkey Pluralities: Plural Information States Versus Non-Atomic Individuals. Linguistics & Philosophy 31(2). 129–209.10.1007/s10988-008-9035-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Brasoveanu, Adrian & Donka F. Farkas (2011), How indefinites choose their scope. Linguistics & Philosophy 34. 1–5510.1007/s10988-011-9092-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Chierchia, Gennaro (1992), Anaphora and dynamic binding. Linguistics & Philosophy 15(2). 111–83.10.1007/BF00635805]Search in Google Scholar
[Chierchia, Gennaro, (2001), a Puzzle about Indefinites. In Carlo Cecchetto, Gennaro Chierchia, and Maria Teresa Guasti (eds.), Semantic Interfaces: Reference, Anaphora, and Aspect. CSLI, Stanford. 51–89.]Search in Google Scholar
[Church, Alonzo (1940), a formulation of the simple theory of types. Journal of Symbolic Logic 5(1). 56–68.10.2307/2266170]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooper, Robin (1979), The interpretation of pronouns. In Heny F., Schnelle H. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 10, New York, Academic Press. 61–92.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooper, Robin (2004), Dynamic generalised quantifiers and hypothetical contexts. In Ursus Philosophicus, a festschrift for Björn Haglund, Department of Philosophy, Göteborg University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dekker, Paul (1994), Predicate logic with anaphora. In Lynn Santelmann and Mandy Harvey (eds.), Proceedings SALT IX. Ithaca, NY: DMLL Publications, Cornell University. 79–95.10.3765/salt.v4i0.2459]Search in Google Scholar
[Dekker, Paul (2008), A multi-dimensional treatment of quantification in extraordinary English. Linguistics & Philosophy (1). 101–127.10.1007/s10988-008-9034-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Dobrovie-Sorin, C. & C. Beyssade 2012, Redefining Indefinites. Berlin, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-3002-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Endriss, Cornelia (2009), Quantificational Topics a Scopal Treatment of Exceptional Wide Scope Phenomena. Studies in Linguistics & Philosophy, Berlin, Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-2303-2_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Farkas, Donka (1981), Quantifier Scope and Syntactic Islands. CLS 17. 59–66.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fernando, Tim (2001). Conservative generalized quantifiers and presupposition. Proceedings SALT XI. Ithaca, NY: DMLL Publications, Cornell University. 172–191.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, Janet & Ivan Sag (1982) Referential and Quantificational Indefinites. Linguistics & Philosophy 5. 355–398.10.1007/BF00351459]Search in Google Scholar
[Geurts, Bart & Rob van der Sandt (1999), Domain Restriction. In P. Bosch & R. A. van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, Cambridge UP, Cambridge. 268–292.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groenendijk, Jeroen & Martin Stokhof (1984), Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, PhD thesis, Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groenendijk, Jeroen & Martin Stokhof (1991), Dynamic Predicate Logic. Linguistics & Philosophy 14. 39-100.10.1007/BF00628304]Search in Google Scholar
[Grudzińska, Justyna (2015), Deskrypcje nieokreślone, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grudzińska, Justyna & Marek Zawadowski (2014), System with Generalized Quantifiers on Dependent Types for Anaphora. In R. Cooper, S. Dobnik, S. Lappin, S. Larsson (eds.), Proceedings of the EACL 2014 Workshop on Type Theory and Natural Language Semantics. 10-18.10.3115/v1/W14-1402]Search in Google Scholar
[Grudzińska, Justyna & Marek Zawadowski (2016), Generalized Quantifiers on Dependent Types: a System for Anaphora, to appear. In S. Chatzikyriakidis and Z. Luo (eds.), Type-Theoretical Semantics: Current Perspectives, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-50422-3_5]Search in Google Scholar
[Hintikka, Jaakko (1986), The Semantics of a certain. Linguistic Inquiry 17 (2). 331–336.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ionin, Tania (2010), The scope of indefinites: an experimental investigation. Nat Lang Semantics 18. 295–350.10.1007/s11050-010-9057-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Kadmon, Nirit (1987), On unique and Non-unique reference and Asymmetric Quantification. Ph.D. diss, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamp, Hans (1981), a theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen & M. Stokhof (eds.), Truth, Interpretation and Information, Foris Dordrecht. 1-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamp, Hans & Uwe Reyle (1993), From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-017-1616-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Kratzer, Angelika (1998), Scope or Pseudoscope? Are there Wide-Scope Indefinites? In S. Rothstein (ed), Events and Grammar. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 163–196.10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_8]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindström, Per (1966), First-order predicate logic with generalized quantifiers, Theoria 32. 186-95.]Search in Google Scholar
[Makkai, Michael (1995), First Order Logic with Dependent Sorts, with Applications to Category Theory, preprtint McGill University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lappin Shalom & Francez, Nissim (1994), E-type pronouns, I-sums, and Donkey anaphora. Linguistics & Philosophy 17. 391–428.10.1007/BF00985574]Search in Google Scholar
[Luo, Zhaohui (2012), Formal Semantics in Modern Type Theories with Coercive Subtyping. Linguistics & Philosophy 35. 491–513.10.1007/s10988-013-9126-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Luo, Zhaohui (2012), Common nouns as types. LACL’12, LNCS 7351. 173–185.10.1007/978-3-642-31262-5_12]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin-Löf, Per (1972), An intuitionstic theory of types, Technical Report, University of Stockholm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin-Löf, Per (1984), Intuitionistic Type Theory, Bibliopolis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matthewson, Lisa (1999), On the Interpretation of Wide-scope Indefinites, Natural Language Semantics 7. 79-134.]Search in Google Scholar
[Montague, Richard (1974), Formal Philosophy. Yale University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mostowski, Andrzej (1957), On a generalization of quantifiers, Fundamenta Mathematicae 44. 12-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ranta, Aarne (1994), Type-Theoretical Grammar, Oxford University Press, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reinhart, Tanya (1997), Quantifier Scope: How Labour is divided between QR and Choice Functions. Linguistics & Philosophy 20. 335-397.10.1023/A:1005349801431]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruys, Eddy (1992), The Scope of Indefinites, PhD thesis, Utrecht University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwarzschild, Roger (2002), Singleton Indefinites. Journal of Semantics 19. 289–314.10.1093/jos/19.3.289]Search in Google Scholar
[Steedman, Mark (2012), Taking Scope. The Natural Semantics of Quantifiers, The MIT Press, Cambridge.10.7551/mitpress/9780262017077.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Szabolcsi, Anna (1997), Background notions in lattice theory and generalized quantifiers. In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of scope taking. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 1–27.10.1007/978-94-011-5814-5_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Szabolcsi, Anna (2010), Quantification. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511781681]Search in Google Scholar
[Van den Berg, Martin H. (1996), The Internal Structure of Discourse, Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Linton, Eric McCready & Nicholas Asher (2006), Information dependency in quantificational subordination. In K. von Heusinger & K. Turner (eds.), Where semantics meets pragmatics. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 268–304.]Search in Google Scholar
[Winter, Yoad (1997), Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites. Linguistics & Philosophy 20. 399-467.10.1023/A:1005354323136]Search in Google Scholar
[Zawadowski, Marek (1989), Formalization of the feature system in terms of preorders. In I. Bellert, Feature System for Quantification Structures in Natural Language. Dordrecht, Foris. 155-175.]Search in Google Scholar
