Accès libre

Theoretical Controversies—Terminological Biases: Consciousness Revisited

À propos de cet article

Citez

Baars, B. J. (2007). The global workspace theory of consciousness. In M. Velmans & S. Schneider (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (pp. 235–246). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Baars, B. J. (n.d.). Beyond the mind-body problem: Seven testable criteria for consciousness. Retrieved from http://mbscience.academia.edu/Departments/CEO/Documents?page=4Search in Google Scholar

Baars, B. J., Franklin, S., & Ramsoy, T. Z. (2013). Global workspace dynamics: cortical “binding and propagation” enables conscious contents. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 200, 1–22. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.0020010.3389/fpsyg.2013.00200Search in Google Scholar

Baars, B. J., & Gage, N. M. (Eds.). (2010). Cognition, brain, and consciousness. Oxford: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Baars, B. J., Seth, A. K., & Edelman, D. B. (2005). Criteria for consciousness in humans and other mammals. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 119–139.10.1016/j.concog.2004.08.006Search in Google Scholar

Bergson, H. (2007). An introduction to metaphysics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8367.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chemero, A., & Silberstein, M. (2012). Complexity and extended phenomenological-cognitive systems. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 35–50.10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01168.xSearch in Google Scholar

Descartes, R. (1901). The method, meditations and philosophy of Descartes (J. Veitch, Trans.). Washington: M. Walter Dunne. Retrieved from http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/1698Search in Google Scholar

Degenaar, J., & Keijzer, F. (2009). Workspace and sensorimotor theories: Complementary approaches to experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16, 77–102. Retrieved: https://www.academia.edu/953797/Workspace_and_Sensorimotor_TheoriesSearch in Google Scholar

Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ivins, W. M. Jr. (1953). Prints and visual communication. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

James, W. (1987). Does “consciousness” exist? (B. Kulkick, Ed.). Writings 1902–1910. New York: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of behavior (L. A. Fisher, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception (J. M. Edie, Ed.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2008). Phenomenology of perception (D. A. Landes, Trans.). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

O’Regan, K. (2011). Why red doesn’t sound like a bell: Understanding the feel of consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, W. (1963). Science, perception and reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Sloman, A. (2010). Phenomenal and access consciousness and the Hard Problem: A view from the designer stance. Journal of Machine Consciousness, 02(01), 117–169. doi: 10.1142/S179384301000042410.1142/S1793843010000424Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Wittgenstein’s lectures. Cambridge, 1932–1935 (A. Ambrose, Ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2199-6059
ISSN:
0860-150X
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Philosophy, other