[Alba, Richard, and Victor Nee. 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674020115]Search in Google Scholar
[Çelikaksoy, Aycan. 2004. Marriage Migration in Denmark. Draft paper. Denmark: Aarhus School of Business.]Search in Google Scholar
[Erdem, Ebru. 2009. Islam, Secularism and Gender Equality: Empirical Findings from 1998 Demographic and Health Survey in Turkey. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting. Toronto, Canada, September 3-6, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fibbi, Rosita, Ceren Topgül, Dusan Ugrina, and Philippe Wanner. 2015. The New Second Generation in Switzerland: Youth of Turkish and Former Yugoslav Descent in Zurich and Basel. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.10.5117/9789089648433]Search in Google Scholar
[FSO (Swiss Federal Statistical Office). 2009. Les comportements démographiques des familles en Suisse. Neuchâtel: FSO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Geaves, Ron. 2003. Religion and Ethnicity: Community Formation in the British Alevi Community. Numen 50(1): 52-70.10.1163/156852703321103247]Search in Google Scholar
[Girard, Alain. 1964. Le choix du conjoint. Paris: PUF, INED.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gokalp, Catherine. 1978. Le réseau familial. Population 33(6): 1077-1094.10.2307/1531960]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonzalez-Ferrer, Amparo. 2006. Who Do Immigrants Marry? Partner Choice among Single Immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review 22(2): 171-185.10.1093/esr/jci050]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamel, Christelle, Doreen Huschek, Nadja Milewski, and Helga de Valk. 2012. Union Formation and Partner Choice. Pp. 225-284 in The European Second Generation Compared. Does the Integration Context Matter? edited by Maurice Crul, Jens Schneider, and Frans Lelie. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.10.1017/9789048516926.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Hartung, Anne, Veronique Vandezande, Marc Swyngedouw, and Karen Phalet. 2009. Partnership Preferences of the Belgian Second Generation: Who Lives with Whom? Paper presented at the Seminar on Multi-attribute Analysis and Projection of Ethnic Populations. Jevnaker, Norway, June 3-5, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hooghiemstra, Erna. 2003. Trouwen over de Grens. Achtergronden van Partnerkeuze van Turken en Marokkanen in Nederland. [Cross-border Marriage. Background to the Partner Choice of Turks and Moroccans in the Netherlands]. SCP-publicatie 2003/4. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalmijn, Matthijs. 1998. Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 395-421.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalter, Frank, and Julia H. Schroedter. 2010. Transnational Marriage among Former Labour Migrants in Germany. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 22(1): 11-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, Ruby Jo Reeves. 1944. Single or Triple Melting Pot? Intermarriage Trends in New Heaven 1870-1940. American Journal of Sociology 49: 331-339.10.1086/219427]Search in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, Ruby Jo Reeves. 1952. Single or Triple Melting Pot? Intermarriage Trends in New Heaven 1870-1950. American Journal of Sociology 58: 56-59.10.1086/221073]Search in Google Scholar
[Lievens, John. 1999. Family-Forming Migration from Turkey and Morocco to Belgium: The Demand for Marriage Partners from the Countries of Origin. International Migration Review 33(3): 717-744.10.1177/019791839903300307]Search in Google Scholar
[Lucassen, Leo, and Charlotte Laarman. 2009. Immigration, Intermarriage and the Changing Face of Europe in the Post War Period. History of the Family 14: 52-68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Milewski, Nadja, and Christelle Hamel. 2010. Union Formation and Partner Choice in a Transnational Context: The Case of Descendants of Turkish Immigrants in France. International Migration Review 44(3): 615-658.10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00820.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Sayad, Abdelmalek 1979. Les enfants illégitimes. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 25: 61-81.10.3406/arss.1979.2623]Search in Google Scholar
[Song, Miri. 2009. Is Intermarriage a Good Indicator of Integration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35(2): 331-348.10.1080/13691830802586476]Search in Google Scholar
[Strassburger, Gaby. 2004. Transnational Ties of the Second Generation: Marriages of Turks in Germany. Pp. 211-232 in Transnational Social Spaces: Agents, Networks and Institutions, edited by Thomas Faist and Eyüp Özveren. Aldershot: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[Timmerman, Christiane. 2006. Gender Dynamics in the Context of Turkish Marriage Migration: The Case of Belgium. Turkish Studies 7(1): 125-143.10.1080/14683840500520642]Search in Google Scholar
[Topgül, Ceren. 2013. Partner Choice of Turkish Origin Youth in Switzerland: The Underlying Mechanisms and Social Implications for Women and Men Gender Dynamics. PhD dissertation, Demography, University of Geneva, Switzerland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Topgül, Ceren. 2015. Family Influence on Partner Choice of Second Generation: What Are the Experiences of Turkish Origin Women in Switzerland? Pp. 43-65 in Spatial Mobility, Migration, and Family Dynamics, edited by Can Aybek, Johannes Huinink, and Raya Muttarak. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-10021-0_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Tubergen, Frank, and Ineke Maas. 2007. Ethnic Intermarriage among Immigrants in the Netherlands: An Analysis of Population Data. Social Science Research 36(3): 1065-1086.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.09.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Wimmer, Andreas. 2008. Elementary Strategies of Ethnic Boundary Making. Ethnic and Racial Studies 31(6): 1025-1055.10.1080/01419870801905612]Search in Google Scholar