Socio-Economic Characteristics in Notified Erythema Migrans Patients

1. Strle F. Lyme borreliosis in Slovenia. Zentralbl Bakteriol 1999; 289: 643-52.10.1016/S0934-8840(99)80023-1Search in Google Scholar

2. Smith R, Takkinen J. Lyme borreliosis: Europe-wide coordinated surveillance and action needed? Euro Surveill 2006; 11: E060622.1. Available March 17, 2015 from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=2977.Search in Google Scholar

3. Rizzoli A, Hauffe H, Carpi G, Vourc HG, Neteler M, Rosa R. Lyme borreliosis in Europe. Euro Surveill 2011; 16: pii 19906. Available March 17, 2015 from: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle. aspx?ArticleId=19906.Search in Google Scholar

4. Sumilo D, Asokliene L, Avsic-Zupanc T, Bormane A, Vasilenko V, Lucenko I. et al. Behavioural responses to perceived risk of tickborne encephalitis: vaccination and avoidance in the Baltics and Slovenia. Vaccine 2008; 26: 2580-8.10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.03.02918423951Search in Google Scholar

5. Gray JS, Dautel H, Estrada-Peña A, Kahl O, Lindgren E. Effects of climate change on ticks and tick-borne diseases in Europe. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2009: 593232.10.1155/2009/593232264865819277106Search in Google Scholar

6. Randolph SE. To what extent has climate change contributed to the recent epidemiology of tick-borne diseases? Vet Parasitol 2010; 167: 92-4.Search in Google Scholar

7. Godfrey ER, Randolph SE. Economic downturn results in tick-borne disease upsurge. Parasit Vectors 2011; 4: 35.10.1186/1756-3305-4-35306321221406086Search in Google Scholar

8. Randolph SE. The shifting landscape of tick-borne zoonoses: tickborne encephalitis and Lyme borreliosis in Europe. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2001; 356: 1045-56.10.1098/rstb.2001.0893108849911516382Search in Google Scholar

9. Estrada-Peña A. Diluting the dilution effect: a spatial Lyme model provides evidence for the importance of habitat fragmentation with regard to the risk of infection. Geospat Health 2009; 3: 143-55.10.4081/gh.2009.21719440959Search in Google Scholar

10. Hubálek Z. Epidemiology of lyme borreliosis. Curr Probl Dermatol 2009; 37: 31-50.10.1159/00021306919367096Search in Google Scholar

11. Bennet L, Halling A, Berglund J. Increased incidence of Lyme borreliosis in southern Sweden following mild winters and during warm, humid summers. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006: 25: 426-32.10.1007/s10096-006-0167-216810531Search in Google Scholar

12. Linard C, Lamarque P, Heyman P, Ducoffre G, Luyasu V, Tersago K. et al. Determinants of the geographic distribution of Puumala virus and Lyme borreliosis infections in Belgium. Int J Health Geogr 2007; 6: 15.10.1186/1476-072X-6-15186780717474974Search in Google Scholar

13. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

14. Lavrakas PJ. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks (Calif.): Sage Publications, 2008: 671.10.4135/9781412963947Search in Google Scholar

15. Brick JM, Montaquila J, Roth S. Identifying problems with raking estimators. In: Alexandra VA, editor. ASA proceedings. American Statistical Association, 2003: 710-7.Search in Google Scholar

16. Ertel SH, Nelson RS, Cartter ML. Effect of surveillance method on reported characteristics of Lyme disease, Connecticut, 1996-2007. Emerg Infect Dis 2012; 18: 242-7.10.3201/eid1802.101219331044022304873Search in Google Scholar

17. Naleway AL, Belongia EA, Kazmierczak JJ, Greenlee RT, Davis JP. Lyme disease incidence in Wisconsin: a comparison of state-reported rates and rates from a population-based cohort. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 155: 1120-7.10.1093/aje/155.12.112012048226Search in Google Scholar

18. Aucott J, Morrison C, Munoz B, Rowe PC, Schwarzwalder A, West SK. Diagnostic challenges of early Lyme disease: lessons from a community case series. BMC Infect Dis 2009; 9: 79.10.1186/1471-2334-9-79269883619486523Search in Google Scholar

19. Strle F, Videcnik J, Zorman P, Cimperman J, Lotric-Furlan S, Maraspin V. Clinical and epidemiological findings for patients with erythema migrans: comparison of cohorts from the years 1993 and 2000. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2002; 114: 493-7.Search in Google Scholar

20. Barszcz A. The influence of harvesting of non-wood forest products on the economic situation of households in Poland. Electr J Polish Agric Univ 2006; 9: 21.Search in Google Scholar

21. Letrilliart L, Ragon B, Hanslik T, Flahault A. Lyme disease in France: a primary care-based prospective study. Epidemiol Infect 2005; 133: 935-42.10.1017/S0950268805004413287032716181516Search in Google Scholar

22. Berglund J, Eitrem R, Ornstein K, Lindberg A, Ringér A, Elmrud H. et al. An epidemiologic study of Lyme disease in southern Sweden. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1319-27.10.1056/NEJM1995111633320047566023Search in Google Scholar

23. Rauter C, Hartung T. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies in Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe: a metaanalysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71: 7203-16.10.1128/AEM.71.11.7203-7216.2005128773216269760Search in Google Scholar

24. Eisen RJ, Piesman J, Zielinski-Gutierrez E, Eisen L. What do we need to know about disease ecology to prevent Lyme disease in the northeastern United States? J Med Entomol 2012; 49: 11-22.Search in Google Scholar

25. Borko S. Metodologija določanja fragmentiranosti gozda. Geogr Vest 2006; 78: 87-95.Search in Google Scholar

26. Bartosik K, Lachowska-Kotowska P, Szymańska J, Pabis A, Buczek A: Lyme borreliosis in south-eastern Poland: relationships with environmental factors and medical attention standards. Ann Agric Environ Med 2011; 18:131-7.Search in Google Scholar