[1. Andresen, J. and R. K. C. Forman. Methodological Pluralism in the Study of Religion. How the Study of Consciousness and Mapping Spiritual Experiences Can Reshape Religious Methodology, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7, No. 11–12, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Atkinson, Q. D. et al. Are Big Gods a big deal in the emergence of big groups?, Religion, Brain & Behavior, 2014.10.1080/2153599X.2014.928351]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Barrett, J. L. Experiments. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bennett, O. Strategic canonization: sanctity, popular culture and the Catholic Church, International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2011 September.10.1080/10286632.2010.544726]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Chilton B. (Ed.). Soundings in the Religion of Jesus: perspectives and methods in Jewish and Christian scholarship. Minneapolis 2012.10.2307/j.ctt22nm9fc]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Chryssides, G. D. and Geaves, R. The Study of Religion: An Introduction to Key Ideas and Methods, London, 1 ed. 2007, 2 ed. 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Ellor, J. W. Methods in religion, spirituality and aging, London, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Engler, S. Grounded Theory. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Esbjörn-Hargens, S. and Wilber, K. Toward a comprehensive integration of science and religion: a post-metaphysical approach. Ed. by P. Clayton and Z. Simpson. The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford: OUP, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Geertz, A. W. Cognitive Approaches to the Study of Religion. Ed. by P. Antes P., A. W. Geertz, R. W. Warne. New Approaches to the Study of Religion, vol. 2, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Geertz, A. W. Religious Narrative, Cognition and Culture: Approaches and Definitions. Ed. by A. W. Geertz and J. Sinding Jensen. Religious Narrative, Cognition and Culture: Image and Word in the Mind of Narrative. Sheffield and Oakvill: Equinox, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Geertz, A. W. Too much Mind and not enough Brain, Body and Culture: On what needs to be done in the Cognitive Science of Religion, Historia Religionum 2, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Geertz, A. W. Whence Religion? How the Brain constructs the Word and what this might tell us about the Origins of Religion, Cognition and Culture. Ed. by A. W. Geertz. Origins of Religion, Cognition and Culture. New York: Routledge, 2014.10.4324/9781315728988]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Gilhus, I. S. Hermeneutics. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Harris. S. The End of Faith, New York London 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Harvey, G. Field research. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Hjelm, T. Discourse analysis. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. http://www.levyna.cz/research/ [Accessed 25 March 2015].]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Hultgård, A. Studying Religion – Concepts, Methods and Dilemmas. http://www.cas.uio.no/Publications/Seminar/Confluence_Hultgard.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Jensen, J. S. Epistemology. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Jensen, J. S. What is Religion? Durham, 2014.10.4324/9781315729466]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Jo, M. Neitz. Feminist Methodologies. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Könemann, J. and Wendel, S. Religion, Öffentlichkeit, Moderne: Transdisziplinäre Perspektiven. Bielefeld, 2016.10.1515/9783839430057]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Nelson, Ch. and Woods, R. H. Jr.. Content analysis. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Oviedo, L. Assessing Cognitive Approaches to Religion: A Theological Account. European Journal of Science and Theology, March 2006, Vol.2, No.1.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Pye, M.. Strategies in the Study of Religions: Volume 1: Exploring Methods and Positions, Boston, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Roof, W. C. Research design. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Rüpke, J. History. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Schenk, R. Vatican II and Jacques Maritain: Resources for the Future? Approaching the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Council. Ed. by J. P. Hittinger. The Vocation of the Catholic Philosopher. From Maritain to John Paul II. Washington, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Slingerland, E. and J. Bulbulia J. Evolutionary Science and the Study of Religion. Religion, Vol. 41, No. 3, September 2011.10.1080/0048721X.2011.604513]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Slone, D. J. Theological Incorrectness: Why Religious People Believe What They Shouldn’t. Oxford 2004.10.1093/0195169263.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Sørensen, J. Religion in mind: A review article of the Cognitive Science of Religion. Numen, Vol. 52, 2005.10.1163/156852705775219974]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Spickard, J. V. Phenomenology. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Stausberg, M. Comparison. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Stausberg M. and S. Engler S. Introduction. Research methods in the study of religion/s. Ed. by M. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Stausberg and S. Engler. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. Routledge: London and New York, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Szocik, K. Ateizm filozoficzny [Philosophical atheism]. Kraków: Nomos, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Szocik, K. Kognitywna teoria religii a naturalność teizmu i ateizmu. Krytyka założenia o intuicyjnej religijności człowieka [Cognitive science of religion and naturalness of theism and atheism. Critique of the intuitive human religiousness hypothesis]. Ed. by J. Woleński and A. Dąbrowski. Metodologiczne i teoretyczne podstawy kognitywistyki [Methodological and theoretical basics of cognitive science]. Copernicus Center Press: Kraków, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Szocik, K. L’Idea della tolleranza nella dottrina della Chiesa Cattolica: un breve schizzo, Orbis Idearum. History of Ideas NetMag. Toleration, and Tolerance, Volume 1, Issue 2 (2014), pp. 85-95.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Szocik, K. Roots of self-domestication, Science, 28 November 2014, Vol 346, Issue 6213, p. 1067.10.1126/science.346.6213.1067-b]Search in Google Scholar
[41. The Gospel according to Matthew. http://biblehub.com/matthew/10-34.htm [Accessed 4 March 2015].]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Waardenburg, J. J. Classical approaches to the study of religion. Aims, methods and theories of research. New York, 1999.10.1515/9783110800722]Search in Google Scholar