[ADAMS, W. T., J. H. ZUO, J. Y. SHIMIZU and J. C. TAPPEINER (1998): Impact of alternative regeneration methods on genetic diversity in coastal douglas-fir. For Sci 44: 390-396.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bacles, C. F. E. and A. S. Jump (2011): Taking a tree’s perspective on forest fragmentation genetics. Trends Plant Sci 16: 13-18.10.1016/j.tplants.2010.10.00221050799]Search in Google Scholar
[BUITEVELD, J., G. G. VENDRAMIN, S. LEONARDI, K. KAMER and T. GEBUREK (2007): Genetic diversity and differentiation in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands varying in management history. For Ecol Manage 247: 98-106.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.018]Search in Google Scholar
[BURCZYK, J., A. LEWANDOWSKI and W. CHAL⁄ UPKA (2004): Local pollen dispersal and distant gene flow in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst). For Ecol and Manage 197: 39-48.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.003]Search in Google Scholar
[CHYBICKI, I. J. and J. BURCZYK (2010): Realized gene flow within mixed stands of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) L. revealed at the stage of naturally established seedling. Mol Ecol 19: 2137-2151.10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04632.x20550635]Search in Google Scholar
[CIESLA, W. M. and E. DONAUBAUER (1994): Decline and dieback of trees and forests: a global overview. FAO Forestry Paper 120, Rome, Italy: FAO.]Search in Google Scholar
[DERERO, A., O. GAILING and R. FINKELDAY (2011): Maintenance of genetic diversity in Cordia africana Lam., a declining forest tree species in Ethiopia. Tree Genet Genomes 7: 1-9.10.1007/s11295-010-0310-1]Search in Google Scholar
[DERING, M. and I. CHYBICKI (2012): Assessment of genetic diversity in two-species oak seed stands and their progeny populations. Scand J For Res 27: 2-9.10.1080/02827581.2011.631934]Search in Google Scholar
[FAGERIA, M. S. and O. P. RAJORA (2013): Effects of harvesting of increasing intensities on genetic diversity and population structure of white spruce. Evol Appl 6(5): 778-794.10.1111/eva.12064577912129387165]Search in Google Scholar
[FISHER, R. A. (1934): Statistical methods for research workers. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.]Search in Google Scholar
[FINKELDEY, R. (1995): Homogeneity of pollen allele frequencies of single seed trees in Picea abies (L.) Karst. plantations. Heredity 74: 451-463.10.1038/hdy.1995.66]Search in Google Scholar
[FINKELDEY, R. (2002): Reproduction in continuous cover forests - the geneticist’s perspective. In: VON GADOW, K., NAGEL, J., SABOROWSKI, J., editors. Continuous Cover Forestry. Assessment, Analysis, Scenarios. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; p. 67-79.10.1007/978-94-015-9886-6_6]Search in Google Scholar
[FINKELDEY, R. and M. ZIEHE (2004): Genetic implications of silvicultural regimes. For Ecol Manage 197: 231-244.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.036]Search in Google Scholar
[GOUDET, J. (2001): FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3) from http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[GÖMÖRY, D. (1992): Effect of stand origin on the genetic diversity of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) populations. For Ecol Manage 54: 215-223.10.1016/0378-1127(92)90014-Z]Search in Google Scholar
[GRODZKI, W. (2010): The decline of Norway spruce Picea abies (L.) Karst. stands in Beskid Śląski and the Żywiecki theoretical concept and reality. Beskydy 3(1): 19 26.]Search in Google Scholar
[HAMRICK, J. (2004): Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. For Ecol Manage 197: 323-335.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.023]Search in Google Scholar
[HAMRICK, J. L., M. J. W. GODT and S. L. SHERMANBROYLES (1992): Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New For 6: 95-124.10.1007/BF00120641]Search in Google Scholar
[HEDRICK, P. W. (2001): Conservation genetics: where are we now? Trends Ecol Evol 16: 629-636. HLÁSNY, T. and Z. SITKOVÁ (2010): Spruce forest decline in the Beskids. Zvolen, Slovakia: National Forest Centre.10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02282-0]Search in Google Scholar
[HLÁSNY, T. and M. TURČÁNI (2013): Persisting bark beetle outbreak indicates the unsustainability of secondary Norway spruce forests: case study from Central Europe. Ann For Sci 70: 481-491.10.1007/s13595-013-0279-7]Search in Google Scholar
[KONNERT, M. (2009): Genetic variation of Picea abies in southern Germany as determined using isozyme and STS markers. Dendrobiology 61: 131-136.]Search in Google Scholar
[KONNERT, M. (2010): Contribution of forest genetics for a sustainable forest management. In: SABOR, J., editor. Poste˛p badan´ w zakresie genetyki populacyjnej i biochemicznej drzew les´nych. Prace Komisji Nauk Rolniczych, Les´nych i Weterynaryjnych PAU 13: 67-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[KORSHIKOV, I. I. and E. A. MUDRIK (2006): Age dynamics of genetic variation in an isolated population of Chalk pine Pinus sylvestris var. Cretacea Kalenicz. Ex. Kom. From Donbass. Russ J Genet 42: 532-538.10.1134/S1022795406050103]Search in Google Scholar
[KOSINSKA, J., A. LEWANDOWSKI and W. CHALUPKA (2007): Genetic variability of Scots pine maternal populations and their progenies. Silva Fenn 41: 5-12.10.14214/sf.304]Search in Google Scholar
[KRAKOWSKI, J. and Y. A. EL-KASSABY (2004): Impacts of alternative silviculture systems on mating systems and genetic diversity of forest tree species. In: BEAULIEU, J., editor. Silviculture and the conservation of genetic resources for sustainable forest management. Proceedings of the symposium of the North American forest commission, forest genetic resources and silviculture working groups, and the International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO); 2003 September 21; Quebec City, Canada: Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service; p. 75-87.]Search in Google Scholar
[KRAMER, A. T., J. L. ISON, M. V. ASHLEY and H. F. HOWE (2008): The paradox of forest fragmentation genetics. Conserv Biol 22: 878-885.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00944.x18544089]Search in Google Scholar
[LEDIG, F. T. (1992): Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. Oikos 63: 87-108.10.2307/3545518]Search in Google Scholar
[LEIMU, R., P. MUTIKAINEN, J. KORICHEVA and M. FISCHER (2006): How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J Ecol 94(5): 942-952.10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01150.x]Search in Google Scholar
[LEWANDOWKI, A. and J. BURCZYK (2000): Mating system and genetic diversity in natural populations of European larch (Larix decidua) and Stone pine (Pinus cembra) located at higher elevations. Silvae Genet 49: 158-161.]Search in Google Scholar
[LOWE, A. J., D. BOSHIER, M. WARD, C. F. E. BACLES and C. NAVARRO (2005): Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation: reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity 9: 255-273.10.1038/sj.hdy.680072516094300]Search in Google Scholar
[MAGHULY, F., W. PINSKER, W. PRAZNIK and S. FLUCH (2006): Genetic diversity in managed subpopulations of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.]. For Ecol aManage 222: 266-271.10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.025]Search in Google Scholar
[MEHTA, C. R. and N. R. PATEL (2010): IBM SPSS exact tests. Cambridge, USA: SPSS Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[NASCIMENTO, S., O. GAILING, R. FINKELDEY, M. ZIEHE and H. H. HATTEMER (2010): Reproduction system of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in pure and mixed stands with different density. Forstarchiv 81: 218-227.]Search in Google Scholar
[NEALE, D. B. and W. T. ADAMS (1985): The mating system in natural and shelterwood stands of Douglas- fir. Theor Appl Genet 71: 201-207.10.1007/BF0025205624247383]Search in Google Scholar
[NEI, M. (1973): Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70: 3321-3323.10.1073/pnas.70.12.33214272284519626]Search in Google Scholar
[NEI, M. (1978): Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.10.1093/genetics/89.3.583121385517248844]Search in Google Scholar
[NOWAKOWSKA, J. A. (2009): Mitochondial and nuclear DNA differentiation of Picea abies populations in Poland. Dendrobiology 61: 119-129.]Search in Google Scholar
[NOWAKOWSKA, J. A., A. MICHALSKA and T. ZACHARA (2014a): Zmiany w strukturze genetycznej naturalnego odnowienia de˛bu (Quercus petraea [Matt.] Liebl.) w odniesieniu do drzew matecznych. Sylwan 158: 83-89.]Search in Google Scholar
[NOWAKOWSKA, J. A., T. ZACHARA and A. KONECKA (2014b): Genetic variability of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) natural regeneration compared with their maternal stands. For Res Pap 75(1): 47-54.10.2478/frp-2014-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[PFEIFFER, A., A. M. OLIVIERI and M. MORGANTE (1997): Identification and characterization of microsatellites in Norway spruce (Picea abies K.). Genome 40: 411-419.10.1139/g97-0559276931]Search in Google Scholar
[RAJORA, O. P. (1999): Genetic biodiversity impacts of silvicultural practices and phenotypic selection in white spruce. Theor Appl Genet 99: 954-961.10.1007/s001220051402]Search in Google Scholar
[SAVOLAINEN, O. and K. KÄRKKÄINEN (1992): Effect of forest management on gene pools. New For 6: 329-345.10.1007/BF00120651]Search in Google Scholar
[SHEA, K. L. (1990): Genetic variation between and within populations of Engelmann spruce and subalpine fir. Genome 33: 1-8.10.1139/g90-001]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHULZE, E. D. and P. H. FREER-SMITH (1990): An evaluation of forest decline based on field observations focused on Norway spruce, Picea abies. Proc R Soc Edinb Biol Sci 97: 155-168.10.1017/S0269727000005339]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHWARTZ, M. K., G. LUIKART and R. S. WAPLES (2006): Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for con - servation and management. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 25-33.10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.00916962204]Search in Google Scholar
[SUŁKOWSKA, M. and J. NOWAKOWSKA (2011): Genetic structure of European beech of mother and progeny stands in Poland on the basis of DNA chloroplast markers. For Ideas 17: 21-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNIYAL, S. K. and A. UNIYAL (2009): Climate change and large-scale degradation of spruce: common pattern across the globe. Clim Res 38: 261-263.10.3354/cr00792]Search in Google Scholar
[WANG, Z.-S., H. LIU, W.-X. XU, N. WEI and S. Q. AN (2010): Genetic diversity in young and mature cohorts of cultivated and wild populations of Picea asperata Mast (Pinaceae), a spruce endemic in western China. Eur J For Res 129: 719-728.10.1007/s10342-010-0377-0]Search in Google Scholar
[WEHENKEL, C., J. J. CORRAL-RIVAS, H. A. CASTELLANOS-BOCAZ and A. PINEDO-ALVAREZ (2009): Is there a positive relationship between naturalness and genetic diversity in forest tree communities? Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 18: 20-27.10.5424/fs/2009181-01047]Search in Google Scholar
[WHITE, G. M., D. H. BOSHIER and W. POWELL (2002): Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: An example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 2038-2042.10.1073/pnas.04264999912231511842203]Search in Google Scholar
[WOJNICKA-PÓŁTORAK, A., W. PRUS-GŁOWACKI, K. CELIN´SKI and A. KORCZYK (2013): Genetic aspects of age dynamics of a natural Picea abies (L.) Karst.population in the Bial⁄owiez·a Primeval Forest, Poland. New For 44: 811-825.10.1007/s11056-013-9367-7]Search in Google Scholar
[WRIGHT, S. (1978): Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol 4. Variability within and among natural populations. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[YAZDANI, R., I. SCOTTI, G. JANSSON, C. PLOMION and G. MATHUR (2003): Inheritance and diversity of simple sequence repeat (SSR) microsatellite markers in various families of Picea abies. Hereditas 138: 219-227.10.1034/j.1601-5223.2003.01524.x14641487]Search in Google Scholar
[YEH, F. C., R.-C. YANG and T. BOYLE (1999): POPGENE version 1.31 - Microsoft Windowsbased freeware for population genetic analysis. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta. https://www.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/popgene.html.]Search in Google Scholar