Features of Informality in Applied Linguistics Research Articles Published in Iranian Local Journals

Argamon, S., Koppel, M., Fine, J., & Shimoni, A. R. 2003. Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text, 23(3), 321-346.10.1515/text.2003.014Search in Google Scholar

Bell, D. M. 2007. Sentence-initial and and but in academic writing. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 17(2), 183-201.10.1075/prag.17.2.01belSearch in Google Scholar

Chang, Y.-Y., & Swales, J. 1999. Informal elements in English academic writing: Threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers? In C. Candlin, & K. Hyland (eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Cobb, T. 2003. Analyzing late interlanguage with learner corpora: Quebec replications of three European studies. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(3), 393-424.10.3138/cmlr.59.3.393Search in Google Scholar

Flowerdew, J. 2006. Use of signalling nouns in a learner corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(3), 345-362.10.1075/ijcl.11.3.07floSearch in Google Scholar

Geisler, C., D. S. Kaufer, and E. R. Steinberg. 1985. The Unattended Anaphoric “This”: When Should Writers Use it? Written Communication.2: 129–155.10.1177/0741088385002002002Search in Google Scholar

Ghaemi, F., & Sabadoust, G. 2017. Interactive and Interactional Markers in ISI and Non-ISI Applied Linguistic Journal Articles Written by Iranian Authors: A Contrastive Meta-Discourse Analysis of Method Section. Journal of Recent Research in English Language Studies, 4(1), 89-108.Search in Google Scholar

Gilquin, G. & Paquot, M. 2008. Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction 1 (1), 41-61.10.1075/etc.1.1.05gilSearch in Google Scholar

Granger, S., & Rayson, P. 1998. Automatic profiling of learner texts. Learner English on computer, 119-131.10.4324/9781315841342-9Search in Google Scholar

Gray, B. 2010. On the use of demonstrative pronouns and determiners as cohesive devices: A focus on sentence-initial this/these in academic prose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 167-183.10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.003Search in Google Scholar

Heylighen, F., & Dewaele, J.-M. 1999. Formality of language: Definition, measurement and behavioral determinants. Internal Report. Center “Leo Apostel”, Free University of Brussels.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. 2001. Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for specific purposes, 20(3), 207-226.10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. 2001. Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles. Written communication, 18(4), 549-574.10.1177/0741088301018004005Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. 2002. What do they mean? Questions in academic writing. Text, 22(4), 529-558.10.1515/text.2002.021Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. 2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?. Journal of pragmatics, 113, 16-29.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. 2017. Is academic writing becoming more informal?. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 40-51.10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Kuo, C. H. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for specific purposes, 18(2), 121-138.10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6Search in Google Scholar

Leedham, M. 2015. Chinese students’ writing in English: Implications from a corpus-driven study. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9780203797488Search in Google Scholar

McCrostie, J. 2008. Writer visibility in EFL learner academic writing: A corpus-based study. ICAME journal, 32(1), 97-114.Search in Google Scholar

Mur-Dueñas, P. 2017. Self-reference in research articles across Europe and Asia: a review of studies. Brno studies in English, 42(1).10.5817/BSE2016-1-4Search in Google Scholar

Simkins-Bullock, J. A. and Wildman, B. G. 1991. An investigation into the relationship between gender and language. Sex Roles 24: 149–160.10.1007/BF00288888Search in Google Scholar

Swales, J. M. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524827Search in Google Scholar

Strauss, S. 1993. Why ‘this’ and ‘that’ are not complete without ‘it’. In K. Beals, G. Cooke, D. Kathman, S. Kita, K. McCullogh, & D. Testen (Eds.), CLS 29: Proceedings of the 29th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 403-417). Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, J. M. 2005. Attended and unattended “this” in academic writing: A long and unfinished story. ESP Malaysia, 11(1), 1-15.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. 2012. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.2173936Search in Google Scholar

Steinberg, E., Kaufer, D., & Geisler, C. 1998. Response to Leonard Moskovit, “When is broad reference clear?” College Composition and Communication, 35, 478e486.10.2307/357801Search in Google Scholar