Human (In)Consistencies in Ian McEwan’s Amsterdam

Childs, Peter (Ed.). 2006. The Fiction of Ian McEwan. A reader’s guide to essential criticism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-21127-8Search in Google Scholar

Gawronski, Bertram, Katja Ehrenberg, Rainer Banse, Johanna Zukova and Karl Cristoph Klauer. 2003. “It’s in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category based and individuating impression formation”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39:16-30.10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00517-6Search in Google Scholar

Hertwig, Ralph, Ulrich Hoffrage and the ABC Research Group. 2013. Simple Heuristic in a Social World. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang. 1974. The Implied Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.10.56021/9780801815690Search in Google Scholar

Jordison, Sam. 2011. “Booker Clud: Amsterdam by Ian McEwan, Characters without personality, comedy without mirth – how McEwan’s worst novel won the Booker is a deep mystery”. The Guardian, 6 December [Online]. Available: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/dec/06/booker-club-amsterdam-ian-mcewan [Accessed 2015, May18].Search in Google Scholar

Küppers, Viviane and Ute J. Bayen. 2014. “Inconsistency effects in source memory and compensatory schema-consistent guessing”. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67(10):2042-2059, DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.904914, Publisher: Taylor & Francis. [Accessed 2015, June10].10.1080/17470218.2014.904914Search in Google Scholar

Malcom, David. 2002. Understanding Ian McEwan. Columbia: South Carolina Press.Search in Google Scholar

McEwan, Ian. 2005 (1998). Amsterdam. London: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

Monin, Benoit and Anna Merritt. 2011. “Moral hypocrisy, moral inconsistency, and the struggle for moral integrity”. The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil, Herzliya Series on Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 3. Mario Mikulincer & Philip Shaver (Eds.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 167-184.10.1037/13091-009Search in Google Scholar

Perlis, Don. 1997. “Sources of, and exploiting, inconsistency: preliminary report”. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7(1-2):13-24, DOI:10.1080/11663081.1997.10510899, Taylor & Francis. [Accessed 2015, June 10].10.1080/11663081.1997.10510899Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Jeffrey T. and Daniel L. Shawhan. 2011. “Is time inconsistency primarily a male problem?”. Applied Economics Letters 18(6):501-504, DOI: 10.1080/13504851003761806, Routledge. [Accessed 2015, June 10].10.1080/13504851003761806Search in Google Scholar

Stangor, Charles and David McMillan. 1992. “Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures”. Psychological Bulletin 111:42-61.10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.42Search in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1966. “Modern Fiction”. Collected Essays, Vol. 2. Leonard Woolf (Ed.). London: Hogarth.Search in Google Scholar