Accès libre

Evaluation of deformable image registration (DIR) methods for dose accumulation in nasopharyngeal cancer patients during radiotherapy

Wannapha Nobnop

Wannapha Nobnop

  • Department of Radiologic Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai UniversityChiang Mai, Thailand
  • Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityChiang Mai, Thailand
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Nobnop, Wannapha
, 
Imjai Chitapanarux

Imjai Chitapanarux

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityChiang Mai, Thailand
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Chitapanarux, Imjai
, 
Hudsaleark Neamin

Hudsaleark Neamin

Department of Radiologic Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai UniversityChiang Mai, Thailand
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Neamin, Hudsaleark
, 
Somsak Wanwilairat

Somsak Wanwilairat

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityChiang Mai, Thailand
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Wanwilairat, Somsak
, 
Vicharn Lorvidhaya

Vicharn Lorvidhaya

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai UniversityChiang Mai, Thailand
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Lorvidhaya, Vicharn
 et 
Taweap Sanghangthum

Taweap Sanghangthum

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn UniversityBangkok, Thailand
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Sanghangthum, Taweap
  
15 sept. 2017
Evaluation of deformable image registration (DIR) methods for dose accumulation in nasopharyngeal cancer patients during radiotherapy's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Catégorie d'article: Research Article
Publié en ligne: 15 sept. 2017
Pages: 438 - 446
Reçu: 03 juin 2017
Accepté: 16 juil. 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2017-0033
Mots clés
© 2017 Wannapha Nobnop, Imjai Chitapanarux, Hudsaleark Neamin, Somsak Wanwilairat, Vicharn Lorvidhaya, Taweap Sanghangthum
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Figure 1

The diagram of the study workflow for dose accumulation and dose comparison.
The diagram of the study workflow for dose accumulation and dose comparison.

Figure 2

The percent ratio to the volume at the initial treatment planning of (A) gross target volume GTV, (B) clinical target volume CTV, (C) right parotid gland, and (D) left parotid gland.
The percent ratio to the volume at the initial treatment planning of (A) gross target volume GTV, (B) clinical target volume CTV, (C) right parotid gland, and (D) left parotid gland.

Figure 3

Histogram of (A) the dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for all of the targets and organs at risk and (B) the inverse consistency error (ICE) in each treatment week and by asymmetric Horn and Schunck (AsyHS), asymmetric demon (AsyDM), symmetric Horn and Schunck (SymHS), and symmetric demon (SymDM) deformable image registration (DIR) methods.
Histogram of (A) the dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for all of the targets and organs at risk and (B) the inverse consistency error (ICE) in each treatment week and by asymmetric Horn and Schunck (AsyHS), asymmetric demon (AsyDM), symmetric Horn and Schunck (SymHS), and symmetric demon (SymDM) deformable image registration (DIR) methods.

Figure 4

The 1st day MVCT image showing the original bilateral parotid gland (A) and the MVCT image at the 31st fraction showing the automatic deformed contour (B) from the AsyDM method. The initial planned dose distribution on the 1st day MVCT image (C) which was used to compare with the accumulated dose distribution at the end of the treatment (D).
The 1st day MVCT image showing the original bilateral parotid gland (A) and the MVCT image at the 31st fraction showing the automatic deformed contour (B) from the AsyDM method. The initial planned dose distribution on the 1st day MVCT image (C) which was used to compare with the accumulated dose distribution at the end of the treatment (D).

Figure 5

Cumulative dose comparison, calculated by the asymmetric Horn and Schunck (AsyHS), asymmetric demon (AsyDM), symmetric Horn and Schunck (SymHS), and symmetric demon (SymDM) deformable registration methods of gross tumour volume (GTV) for (A) median dose, D50(B) near-minimum dose, D98 and (C) near-maximum dose, D2 and clinical tumour volume (CTV) for (D) median dose, D50(E) near-minimum dose, D98, and (F) near-maximum dose, D2. The reference (Ref) accumulated dose was computed by summing the weekly doses corresponding to the weekly MVCTs defined by the radiation oncologist.
Cumulative dose comparison, calculated by the asymmetric Horn and Schunck (AsyHS), asymmetric demon (AsyDM), symmetric Horn and Schunck (SymHS), and symmetric demon (SymDM) deformable registration methods of gross tumour volume (GTV) for (A) median dose, D50(B) near-minimum dose, D98 and (C) near-maximum dose, D2 and clinical tumour volume (CTV) for (D) median dose, D50(E) near-minimum dose, D98, and (F) near-maximum dose, D2. The reference (Ref) accumulated dose was computed by summing the weekly doses corresponding to the weekly MVCTs defined by the radiation oncologist.

Figure 6

Cumulative dose comparison, calculated from the asymmetric Horn and Schunck (AsyHS), asymmetric demon (AsyDM), symmetric Horn and Schunck (SymHS), and symmetric demon (SymDM) deformable registration methods in mean dose, Dmean, of (A) right parotid gland and (B) left parotid gland, and near-maximum dose, D2, of (C) spinal cord.
Cumulative dose comparison, calculated from the asymmetric Horn and Schunck (AsyHS), asymmetric demon (AsyDM), symmetric Horn and Schunck (SymHS), and symmetric demon (SymDM) deformable registration methods in mean dose, Dmean, of (A) right parotid gland and (B) left parotid gland, and near-maximum dose, D2, of (C) spinal cord.

Figure 7

Cumulative dose comparison, derived from helical tomotherapy planned adaptive software (HT) and DIRART software in median dose, D50, of (A) right parotid gland and (B) left parotid gland.
Cumulative dose comparison, derived from helical tomotherapy planned adaptive software (HT) and DIRART software in median dose, D50, of (A) right parotid gland and (B) left parotid gland.
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Médecine, Médecine clinique, Médecine interne, Hématologie, oncologie, Radiologie
RSS Feed de la revue