[Andersson L., 2007. Forty years later. A retrospect on marginality and local development. In: Jones G., Leimgruber W., Nel E. (eds), Issues in geographical marginality. General and theoretical aspect. International Geographical Union: 13-28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Andreoli M., 1994. Development and marginalisation in Liguria region. In: Chang-Yi D., Ching Jou S., Yuh Lu Y. (eds), Marginality and development issues in marginal regions. National Taiwan University, Taipei: 41-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bell S., 2009. Mental map. In: Kitchin R., Thrift N. (eds), International encyclopedia of human geography. Elsevier Ltd: 70-75. ISBN 978-0-08-044910-4.10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00472-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Buchta S., 2003. Slovenský vidiek na konci dvadsiateho storočia. Sociológia-Slovak Sociological Review 2: 125-140.]Search in Google Scholar
[CEDRA report. Report of the Commission for the Economic Development of Rural Areas Energising Ireland’s rural economy. Online: http://ruralireland.ie/index.php/cedra-reports (accessed 20 Sept. 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[CEDRA report. Research report of the Commission on the Economic Development of Rural Ireland. Online: http://ruralireland.ie/index.php/cedra-reports (accessed 20 Sept. 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Che D., 2006. Developing ecotourism in First World, resource- dependent areas. Geoforum 37: 212-226.10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.02.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Chromý P., 2003. Historical-geographical and cultural-geographical research on the development in border, marginal and peripheral regions in Czechia. In: Kowalczyk A. (ed.), Theoretical and methodological aspects of geographical space at the turn of the century. Theoretical and methodological challenges. Warsaw: 187-192.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chromý P., Janů H., 2008. Regional identity, activation of territorial communities and the potential of the development of peripheral regions. In: Svatoňová H. (ed.), Geography in Czechia and Slovakia. Theory and practice at the onset of 21st century. Masaryk University, Brno: 105-107.]Search in Google Scholar
[Conway T., Cawley M., 2012. Organisational networking in an emerging ecotourism destination. Tourism Planning & Development 9(4): 397-409.10.1080/21568316.2012.726256]Search in Google Scholar
[Creamer C., Blair N., Keaveney K., O’Keeffe B., Driscoll J., 2009. Rural restructuring: Local sustainable solutions to the rural challenge. International Centre for Local and Regional Development.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crewe J., 1991. Defining marginality? Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature 10 (1): 121-130.10.2307/463956]Search in Google Scholar
[Cullen B.T., Pretes M., 2000. The meaning of marginality: Interpretations and perceptions in social science. The Social Science Journal 37(2): 215-229.10.1016/S0362-3319(00)00056-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Dingsdale A., 1999. Redefining Eastern Europe: A new regional geography of post-socialist Europe? Geography 84(3): 204-221.]Search in Google Scholar
[Džupinová E., Halás M., Horňák M., Hurbánek P., Káčerová M., Michniak D., Ondoš S., Rochovská A., 2008. Periférnosť a priestorová polarizácia na území Slovenska. Geografika, Bratislava: 186.]Search in Google Scholar
[Falťan Ľ., Gajdoš P., Pašiak J., 1995. Sociálna marginalita území Slovenska. Social Marginality of Territories of Slovakia. SPACE Centrum pre analýzu sociálnej politiky: 223.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferrão J., Lopes R., 2004. Understanding peripheral rural areas as contexts for economic development. In: Labrianidis L. (ed.), The future of Europe’s rural peripheries. Ashgate, Aldershot: 31-61.10.4324/9781351146647-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Gregory D., Johnston R., Pratt G., Watts M., Whatmore S., 2009. The dictionary of human geography. 5th edition, Wiley-Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Havlíček T., 2003. Are border regions peripheral territories? In: Kowalczyk A. (ed.), Theoretical and methodological aspects of geographical space at the turn of the century. Theoretical and methodological challenges. Warsaw: 193-198.]Search in Google Scholar
[Havlíček T., Chromý P., Jančák V., Marada M., 2005. Vybrané teoreticko-metodologické aspekty a trendy geografického výzkumu periferních oblastí. In: Novotná M. (ed.), Problémy periferních oblastí. Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje: 6-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoggart K., Paniagua A., 2001. What rural restructuring? Journal of Rural Studies 17: 41-62.10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00036-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Hurbánek P., 2004a. Zmeny úlohy priestorového aspektu v interpretáciách pojmov periférnosť (marginalita) a vidiek. Geografie a proměny poznání prostorové reality. Sborník z příspěvků z Mezinárodní geografické konference (Ostrava 30-31.08.2004). Přírodovědecká fakulta, Ostravská Univerzita: 102-110.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hurbánek P., 2004b. Priestorový aspekt periférnosti v rurálno- geografickej a sídelno-geografickej interpretácii vidieka. Acta Universitatis Purkynianae 100: 49-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackson P., 2001. Making sense of qualitative data. In: Limb M., Dwyer C. (eds), Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues and debates. Arnold, London: 199-214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jakešová L., Vaishar A., 2012. Sustainable inner peripheries? A case study of the Olešnice micro-region (Czech Republic). Moravian Geographical Reports 20(4): 13-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jeřábek M., Dokoupil J., Havlíček T., 2004. České pohraničíbariéra nebo prostor zprostředkování? Academia, Praha.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnston R.J., Gregory D., Pratt G., Watts M., Smith D.M. (eds), 2000. The dictionary of human geography (4th ed.). Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Labrianidis L., 2004. The future of Europe’s rural peripheries. Ashgate, Aldershot.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leimgruber W., 1994. Marginality and marginal regions: Problems of definition. In: Chang-Yi D. (ed.), Development issues in marginal regions. Marginality and development issues in marginal regions. Proceedings of the IGU Study Group. Taipei: 1-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leimgruber W., 2004. Between global and local: Marginality and marginal regions in the context of globalisation and deregulation. Ashgate, Aldershot.]Search in Google Scholar
[Limb M., Dwyer C. (eds), 2001. Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues and debates. Arnold, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Máliková L., 2013. Theoretical and methodological aspects of identifying marginal rural areas in the Slovak and Czech studies. In: Zborník príspevkov medzinárodnej konferencie doktorandov MendelNet 2013 (Brno, 20-21.11.2013). Agronomická fakulta, Mendelova Univerzita: 459-464.]Search in Google Scholar
[Máliková L., Spišiak P., 2013. Vybrané problémy marginality a periférnosti rurálnych regiónov na Slovensku. Acta Geographica Universitatis Comenianae 57(1): 51-70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Máliková L., Klobučník M., Bačík V., Spišiak P., 2015. Socio- economic changes in the borderland of the Visegrad group (V4) countries. Moravian Geographical Reports 23(2): 26-37.10.1515/mgr-2015-0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Marada M., 2001. Vymezení periferních oblastí Česka a studium jejich znaků pomocí statistické analýzy. Geografie - Sborník ČGS 106(1): 12-24.10.37040/geografie2001106010012]Search in Google Scholar
[McDonagh J., 2002a. Peripherality and the West of Ireland: The need for reevaluation? In: McDonagh J. (ed.), Economy, society, and peripherality: experiences from the West of Ireland. Arlen House, Galway: 97-112.]Search in Google Scholar
[McDonagh J. 2002b. Peripheral location, human resource deficit and sustainable rural communities. In: McDonagh J. (ed.), Economy, society, and peripherality: experiences from the West of Ireland. Arlen House, Galway: 165-180.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mehretu A., Pigozzi B.W., Sommers L.M., 2000. Concepts in social and spatial marginality. Geografiska Annaler 82 B (2): 89-101.10.1111/j.0435-3684.2000.00076.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Musil J., Müller J., 2008. Vnitřní periferie v České republice jako mechanismus sociální exkluze. Sociologický časopis/ Czech Sociological Review 2: 321-348.10.13060/00380288.2008.44.2.05]Search in Google Scholar
[Newman D., 2006. The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in a ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography 30(1): 143-161.10.1191/0309132506ph599xx]Search in Google Scholar
[Perlín R., Kučerová S., Kučera Z., 2010. Typologie venkovského prostoru Česka. Geografie 115(2): 61-187.10.37040/geografie2010115020161]Search in Google Scholar
[Relph E., 1976. Place and placelessness. Pion, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt M.H., 1998. An integrated systemic approach to marginal regions: From definition to development policies. In: Jussila H., Leimgruber W., Majoral R. (eds), Perception of marginality: Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality. Ashgate, Aldershot: 45-66.10.4324/9780429447457-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Seidl T., Chromý P., 2010. Problémy integrace marginálního území do regionálného systému: Příklad vojenského újezdu Boletice. Geografie 115(1): 44-63.10.37040/geografie2010115010044]Search in Google Scholar
[Shobe H., Banis D., 2010. Music regions and mental maps: Teaching cultural geography. Journal of Geography 109(2): 87-96.10.1080/00221341.2010.482160]Search in Google Scholar
[Sommers L.M., Mehretu A., 1998. International perspectives on socio-spatial marginality. In: Jussila H., Leimgruber W., Majoral R. (eds), Perception of marginality: Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality. Ashgate, Aldershot: 135-145.10.4324/9780429447457-10]Search in Google Scholar
[Šebová L., 2013. Identifikácia marginálnych regiónov na Slovensku. Dizertačná práca. Prírodovedecká fakulta Univerzity Komenského, Bratislava.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tuan Y.F., 1977. Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tykkyläinen M., 1998. From territorial marginality to marginality in cybersociety. In: Jussila H., Leimgruber W., Majoral R. (eds), Perception of marginality: Theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality. Ashgate, Aldershot: 123-132.10.4324/9780429447457-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Vaishar A., Zapletalová J., 2005. Marginalizace moravsko- -slovenského pohraničí. In: Novotná M. (ed.), Problémy periferních oblastí. Univerzita Karlova v Praze. Přírodovědecká fakulta. Katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje: 167-176.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods M., 2005. Rural geography: Processes, responses and experiences in rural restructuring. Sage, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods M., 2007. Engaging the global countryside: Globalisation, hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place. Progress in Human Geography 31(4): 485-507.10.1177/0309132507079503]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods M., 2011. Rural. Routledge, London. 10.4324/9780203844304]Search in Google Scholar