Accès libre

Comparative Analysis of Ultrasound Guided Central Venous Catheterization Compared to Blind Catheterization

À propos de cet article

Citez

1. Emerman CL, Bellon M, Lukens TW, May TE, Effron D. A prospective study of femoral versus subclavian vein catheterization during cardiac arres. Annals of emergency medicine. 1990;19(1):26-30.10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82135-3Search in Google Scholar

2. Joffe A, Anton, Lequier L, Vandermeer, Tjosvold L, Larsen B, et al. Nutritional support for critically ill children. The Cochrane Library. 2009.10.1002/14651858.CD005144.pub219370617Search in Google Scholar

3. Rajaram SS, Nayan DK, Ankur K, Mithil G, Susan CK, Brampton W, et al. Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 2.10.1002/14651858.CD003408.pub3651706323450539Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003; 348(12):1123-1133.10.1056/NEJMra01188312646670Search in Google Scholar

5. Daily PO, Griepp B, Shumway E. Percutaneous internal jugular vein cannulation. Archives of surgery. 1970;101(4):534-536.10.1001/archsurg.1970.013402800860235457256Search in Google Scholar

6. Bannon MP, Heller F, Rivera M. Anatomic considerations for central venous cannulation. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:27-39.10.2147/RMHP.S10383327092522312225Search in Google Scholar

7. Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, Lefrant JY, Raffy B, Barre, et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2001; 286(6):700-707.10.1001/jama.286.6.70011495620Search in Google Scholar

8. Sznajder JL, Zveibil FR, Bitterman H, Weiner P, Bursztein SI. Central vein catheterization: failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1986; 146(2):259-261.10.1001/archinte.1986.00360140065007Search in Google Scholar

9. Seldinger I. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography: a new technique. Acta Radiologica. 1953 May 1; 39(5):368-376.10.3109/0001692530913672213057644Search in Google Scholar

10. Troianos CA, Hartman GS, Glas KE, Skubas NJ, Eberhardt RT, Walker JD, et al. Guidelines for performing ultrasound guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2011; 24(12):1291-1318.10.1016/j.echo.2011.09.02122115322Search in Google Scholar

11. Brass P, Hellmich, Kolodziej L, Schick G, Smith F. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(1).10.1002/14651858.CD011447651699825575245Search in Google Scholar

12. Guidance on the use of ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheters.. Ntioanal INstitute of Health Care and Clinnical Excellence; September 2002.Search in Google Scholar

13. Maizel J, Bastide MA, Richecoeur J, Frenoy E, Lemaire C, Sauneuf B, et al. Practice of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter technique by the French intensivists: a survey from the BoReal study group. Annals of Intensive Care. 2016;6(1):76.10.1186/s13613-016-0177-x497726327502195Search in Google Scholar

14. Ameh V, Jones S. Central venous catheterisation: internal jugular or subclavian approach? Emergency Medicine Journal. 2007;24(9):662-663.10.1136/emj.2007.052274246466617711948Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Torgay A, Pirat A, Candan S, Zeyneloglu P, Arslan G, Haberal M. Internal jugular versus subclavian vein catheterization for central venous catheterization in orthotopic liver transplantation. InTransplantation proceedings. 2005;Vol. 37, No. 7, 3171-3173. Elsevier.10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.07.02116213340Search in Google Scholar

16. Timsit JF. What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients? Critical Care. 2003;7(6):1.10.1186/cc217937436414624670Search in Google Scholar

17. Fragou M, Gravvanis A, Dimitriou V, Kouraklis G, Karabinis A, Saranteas T, et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the landmark method in critical care patients: a prospective randomized study. Critcal Care Medicine. 2011; 39(7):1607-1612.10.1097/CCM.0b013e318218a1ae21494105Search in Google Scholar

18. Vincent JL, Bihari J, Suter M, Bruining A, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe: results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. Jama. 1995;274(8):639-644.10.1001/jama.1995.03530080055041Search in Google Scholar

19. Karakitsos D, Nikolaos L, De Groot E, Patrinakos AP, Gregorios K, John P, et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients. Critical Care. 2006; 17;10(6):R162.Search in Google Scholar

20. Denys BG, Uretsky BF, Reddy PS. Ultrasound assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique. Circulation. 1993;87(5):1557-1562.10.1161/01.CIR.87.5.1557Search in Google Scholar

21. Prabhu V, Juneja, Palepu GB, Sathyanarayanan M, Subhramanyam, Gandhe S. Ultrasound-guided femoral dialysis access placement: a single-center randomized trial. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2010; 5(2):235-239.10.2215/CJN.04920709282759419965532Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Lefrant JY, Muller L, De La Coussaye JE, Prudhomme M, Ripart J, Gouzes C, et al. Risk factors of failure and immediate complication of subclavian vein catheterization in critically ill patients. Intensive care medicine. 2002;28(8):1036-1041.10.1007/s00134-002-1364-912185422Search in Google Scholar

23. Matthew MJ, Husain FA, Piesman M, Mullenix PS, Steele SR, Andersen CA, et al. Is routine ultrasound guidance for central line placement beneficial? A prospective analysis. Current surgery. 2004;61(1):71-74.10.1016/j.cursur.2003.07.01014972174Search in Google Scholar

24. Mansfild PF, Hohn CD, Fornage DB, Gregurich MA, Ota M. Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization. New England Journal of Medicine. 1994; 331(26):1735-1738.10.1056/NEJM1994122933126027984193Search in Google Scholar

25. Cronen MC, Cronen PW, Arino P, Ellis K. Delayed pneumothorax after subclavian vein catheterization and positive pressure ventilation. British journal of anaesthesia. 1991;67(4):480-482.10.1093/bja/67.4.4801931409Search in Google Scholar

26. Takeyama H, Taniguchi M, Sawai H, Funahashi H, Akamo Y, Suzuki S, et al. Limiting vein puncture to three needle passes in subclavian vein catheterization by the infraclavicular approach. Surgery today. 2006;36(9):779-782.10.1007/s00595-006-3259-916937280Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27. Kilbourne MJ, Bochicchio GV, Scalea T, Xiao Y. Avoiding common technical errors in subclavian central venous catheter placement. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2009; 208(1):104-109.10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.09.02519228511Search in Google Scholar

28. Miller AH, Brett RA, Mills TJ, Woody R, Longmoor CE, Foster B. Ultrasound guidance versus the landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheters in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2002;9(8):800-805.10.1197/aemj.9.8.800Search in Google Scholar

29. Shah A, Smith A, Panchatsharam S. Ultrasound-guided subclavian venous catheterisation–is this the way forward? A narrative review. International journal of clinical practice. 2013; 67(8):726-732.10.1111/ijcp.1214623869675Search in Google Scholar

30. Troianos CA, Jobes DR, Ellison N. Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective, randomized study. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1991; 72(6):823-826.Search in Google Scholar

31. Blaivas M AS. Blaivas M, Adhikari S. An unseen danger: frequency of posterior vessel wall penetration by needels during atemts to place central catheters during ultrasound guidence. Critical Care Medicine. 2009;37:2345–2349.10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a067d419531950Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1857-8985
ISSN:
1857-9345
Langue:
Anglais